World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 37 9207 8604 4881 4445 127 5606

Abigail Powers publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Abigail Powers between 2009 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Abigail Powers published across 18 years, from 2009 to 2026, averaging 10.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 32 publications in 2021. 31 of the 191 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2009 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 32. Peak 32 publications in 2021. 2009: 2 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 32 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 30 publications 2024: 25 publications 2025: 30 publications 2026: 1 publication
2009 2026

191 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Abigail Powers: publications per year, 2009 to 2026
Year Publications
2009 2
2010 0
2011 3
2012 0
2013 0
2014 3
2015 5
2016 6
2017 10
2018 3
2019 9
2020 13
2021 32
2022 19
2023 30
2024 25
2025 30
2026 1
Total 191
Download as CSV

Abigail Powers publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Abigail Powers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 127 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 127
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Abigail Powers D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Abigail Powers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 37
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Abigail Powers is affiliated with Emory University in the United States and has a significant research output primarily in psychology and medicine. Their work is concentrated in several subfields, including clinical psychology, sociology and political science, public health, environmental and occupational health, behavioral neuroscience, and psychiatry and mental health.

Their research covers a variety of topics related to trauma, mental health, and psychosocial development. Major themes include:

  • Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Resilience and Mental Health

Abigail Powers has published frequently in reputable venues, among which the most common are:

  • Biological Psychiatry
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy
  • Psychological Medicine
  • Journal of Mood and Anxiety Disorders

Selected recent papers include:

  • "Dissecting the Shared Genetic Architecture of Suicide Attempt, Psychiatric Disorders, and Known Risk Factors" (2021, Biological Psychiatry)
  • "GWAS Meta-Analysis of Suicide Attempt: Identification of 12 Genome-Wide Significant Loci and Implication of Genetic Risks for Specific Health Factors" (2023, American Journal of Psychiatry)
  • "Adverse childhood experiences in African Americans: Framework, practice, and policy." (2021, American Psychologist)
  • "Evaluating the impact of trauma and PTSD on epigenetic prediction of lifespan and neural integrity" (2020, Neuropsychopharmacology)
  • "Trauma exposure and stress-related disorders in a large, urban, predominantly African-American, female sample" (2021, Archives of Women's Mental Health)

The scientist collaborates extensively, with frequent coauthors including:

  • Vasiliki Michopoulos
  • Yara Mekawi
  • Jennifer S. Stevens
  • Negar Fani
  • Bekh Bradley

Abigail Powers' body of work addresses intersecting areas of trauma, genetic factors in psychiatric conditions, and health disparities, drawing on an interdisciplinary approach that incorporates clinical and sociopolitical dimensions of mental health.

Best Publications

  • Inflammation in Fear- and Anxiety-Based Disorders: PTSD, GAD, and Beyond.

    Vasiliki Michopoulos;Vasiliki Michopoulos;Abigail Powers;Charles F Gillespie;Kerry J Ressler

  • Is developmental timing of trauma exposure associated with depressive and post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms in adulthood?

    Erin C. Dunn;Erin C. Dunn;Kristen Nishimi;Abigail Powers;Bekh Bradley;Bekh Bradley

  • The protective role of friendship on the effects of childhood abuse and depression

    B A Abigail Powers;Kerry J. Ressler;Kerry J. Ressler;Rebekah G. Bradley;Rebekah G. Bradley

  • The mediating role of emotion dysregulation and depression on the relationship between childhood trauma exposure and emotional eating

    Vasiliki Michopoulos;Vasiliki Michopoulos;Abigail Powers;Carla Moore;Stephanie Villarreal

  • Neurobiological Development in the Context of Childhood Trauma.

    Dorthie Cross;Negar Fani;Abigail Powers;Bekh Bradley

  • PTSD, emotion dysregulation, and dissociative symptoms in a highly traumatized sample

    Abigail Powers;Dorthie Cross;Negar Fani;Bekh Bradley

  • Exposure to Childhood Abuse and Later Substance Use: Indirect Effects of Emotion Dysregulation and Exposure to Trauma

    Amar Mandavia;Gabriella G. N. Robinson;Bekh Bradley;Bekh Bradley;Kerry J. Ressler;Kerry J. Ressler

  • Developmental timing of trauma exposure and emotion dysregulation in adulthood: Are there sensitive periods when trauma is most harmful?

    Erin C. Dunn;Erin C. Dunn;Kristen Nishimi;Stephanie H. Gomez;Abigail Powers

  • Emotion dysregulation as a mediator between childhood emotional abuse and current depression in a low-income African-American sample.

    Thomas Crow;Dorthie Cross;Abigail Powers;Bekh Bradley

  • Gene × Environment Determinants of Stress- and Anxiety-Related Disorders.

    Sumeet Sharma;Abigail Powers;Bekh Bradley;Kerry J. Ressler

  • GWAS Meta-Analysis of Suicide Attempt: Identification of 12 Genome-Wide Significant Loci and Implication of Genetic Risks for Specific Health Factors.

    Unknown

  • Childhood trauma, PTSD, and problematic alcohol and substance use in low-income, African-American men and women

    Dorthie Cross;Thomas Crow;Abigail Powers;Bekh Bradley

  • Differential predictors of DSM-5 PTSD and ICD-11 complex PTSD among African American women.

    Abigail Powers;Negar Fani;Sierra Carter;Dorthie Cross

  • Adverse childhood experiences in African Americans: Framework, practice, and policy

    Joya N. Hampton-Anderson;Sierra Carter;Negar Fani;Charles F. Gillespie

  • Evaluating the impact of trauma and PTSD on epigenetic prediction of lifespan and neural integrity.

    Seyma Katrinli;Jennifer S. Stevens;Agaz H. Wani;Adriana Lori

  • Associations Between Childhood Abuse, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, and Implicit Emotion Regulation Deficits: Evidence From a Low-Income, Inner-City Population.

    Abigail Powers;Amit Etkin;Anett Gyurak;Bekh Bradley

  • Emotion dysregulation is associated with increased prospective risk for chronic PTSD development.

    Ioana Pencea;Adam P. Munoz;Jessica L. Maples-Keller;Devika Fiorillo

  • Trauma, psychiatric disorders, and treatment history among pregnant African American women.

    Abigail Powers;Briana Woods-Jaeger;Jennifer S Stevens;Bekh Bradley

  • Childhood trauma, PTSD, and psychosis: Findings from a highly traumatized, minority sample

    Abigail Powers;Negar Fani;Dorthie Cross;Kerry J. Ressler

  • Dissecting the shared genetic architecture of suicide attempt, psychiatric disorders and known risk factors

    Niamh Mullins;Jooeun Kang;Adrian I Campos;Adrian I Campos;Jonathan R I Coleman;Jonathan R I Coleman

Frequent Co-Authors

Bekh Bradley
Bekh Bradley Emory University
Kerry J. Ressler
Kerry J. Ressler Harvard University
Tanja Jovanovic
Tanja Jovanovic Wayne State University
Negar Fani
Negar Fani Emory University
Seth D. Norrholm
Seth D. Norrholm Wayne State University
Erin C. Dunn
Erin C. Dunn Harvard University
Karestan C. Koenen
Karestan C. Koenen Harvard University
Nadine J. Kaslow
Nadine J. Kaslow Emory University
Karen N. Conneely
Karen N. Conneely Emory University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology degrees online opens doors to a range of rewarding career pathways. If you're interested in becoming a mental health professional, understanding the licensing requirements in your state or city is crucial. For instance, the process of becoming a licensed therapist in Toledo involves specific educational milestones and practical experience.

Similarly, those aiming to learn how to become a licensed therapist in Tucson must navigate local licensing steps, including graduate coursework and supervised clinical hours. Understanding these requirements can help you tailor your education choices and select the best online degree to meet your goals.

For aspiring counselors, studying the Tulsa licensed therapist education requirements is also beneficial, as educational paths and internship expectations may vary. Meanwhile, researching how to become a licensed therapist in Virginia Beach shows that each locality has its own steps from degree selection to licensure.

By comparing locations and career options, you can find the right online degree and plan the steps toward a fulfilling profession in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Abigail Powers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles