World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
63
Citations
19525
World Ranking
3077
National Ranking
150

Melissa J. Green publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Melissa J. Green sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 277 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Melissa J. Green D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Melissa J. Green sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Melissa J. Green is affiliated with the University of New South Wales in Australia and focuses on research spanning multiple areas within medicine and psychology. Their work encompasses clinical psychology, psychiatry and mental health, cognitive neuroscience, genetics, and general health professions.

The scientist's research covers a variety of topics including:

  • Functional brain connectivity studies
  • Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development
  • Child abuse and trauma
  • Advanced neuroimaging techniques and applications
  • Genetic associations and epidemiology
  • Homelessness and social issues

Recent publications by Melissa J. Green include:

  • The genetic architecture of the human cerebral cortex, 2020, Science
  • Increased power by harmonizing structural MRI site differences with the ComBat batch adjustment method in ENIGMA, 2020, NeuroImage
  • Virtual Histology of Cortical Thickness and Shared Neurobiology in 6 Psychiatric Disorders, 2020, JAMA Psychiatry
  • What we learn about bipolar disorder from large-scale neuroimaging: Findings and future directions from the ENIGMA Bipolar Disorder Working Group, 2020, Human Brain Mapping
  • Brain ageing in schizophrenia: evidence from 26 international cohorts via the ENIGMA Schizophrenia consortium, 2022, Molecular Psychiatry

The frequent coauthors collaborating with Melissa J. Green include:

  • Vaughan J. Carr
  • Kristin R. Laurens
  • Yann Quidé
  • Stacy Tzoumakis
  • Kimberlie Dean

Publication venues where this scientist has frequently contributed include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • UNC Libraries
  • Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
  • Molecular Psychiatry

Best Publications

  • Genome-wide association study identifies 30 loci associated with bipolar disorder

    Eli A. Stahl;Eli A. Stahl;Gerome Breen;Andreas J. Forstner;Andrew McQuillin

  • Genome-wide association study of more than 40,000 bipolar disorder cases provides new insights into the underlying biology

    Niamh Mullins;Andreas J. Forstner;Andreas J. Forstner;Andreas J. Forstner;Kevin S. O'Connell;Kevin S. O'Connell;Brandon Coombes

  • Genomic Relationships, Novel Loci, and Pleiotropic Mechanisms across Eight Psychiatric Disorders

    Phil H. Lee;Verneri Anttila;Hyejung Won;Yen-Chen A. Feng

  • The genetic architecture of the human cerebral cortex

    Katrina L. Grasby;Neda Jahanshad;Jodie N. Painter;Lucía Colodro-Conde

  • Genomic Dissection of Bipolar Disorder and Schizophrenia, Including 28 Subphenotypes

    Douglas M. Ruderfer;Stephan Ripke;Stephan Ripke;Stephan Ripke;Andrew McQuillin;James Boocock

  • Brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels in schizophrenia: a systematic review with meta-analysis

    M J Green;S L Matheson;A Shepherd;C S Weickert;C S Weickert

  • Systematic meta-review and quality assessment of the structural brain alterations in schizophrenia

    Alana M. Shepherd;Kristin R. Laurens;Kristin R. Laurens;Sandra L. Matheson;Vaughan J. Carr

  • Social threat perception and the evolution of paranoia

    Melissa J Green;Mary L Phillips

  • The cognitive and neurophysiological basis of emotion dysregulation in bipolar disorder

    Melissa J. Green;Catherine M. Cahill;Catherine M. Cahill;Gin S. Malhi;Gin S. Malhi;Gin S. Malhi

  • Use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to enhance cognitive training: effect of timing of stimulation.

    Donel M. Martin;Rose Liu;Angelo Alonzo;Melissa Green

  • Can transcranial direct current stimulation enhance outcomes from cognitive training? A randomized controlled trial in healthy participants.

    Donel M. Martin;Rose Liu;Angelo Alonzo;Angelo Alonzo;Melissa Green

  • Increased power by harmonizing structural MRI site differences with the ComBat batch adjustment method in ENIGMA.

    Joaquim Radua;Eduard Vieta;Russell Shinohara;Peter Kochunov

  • Morning cortisol levels in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: a meta-analysis.

    Leah Girshkin;Leah Girshkin;Sandra L. Matheson;Alana M. Shepherd;Melissa J. Green

  • Virtual Histology of Cortical Thickness and Shared Neurobiology in 6 Psychiatric Disorders

    Yash Patel;Nadine Parker;Jean Shin;Derek Howard

  • Corticostriatal Control of Goal-Directed Action Is Impaired in Schizophrenia

    Richard W. Morris;Stephanie Quail;Kristi R. Griffiths;Melissa J. Green

  • Schizoaffective disorder: diagnostic issues and future recommendations

    Gin S Malhi;Melissa Green;Andrea Fagiolini;Eric D Peselow

  • Systematic Meta-Analysis of Insula Volume in Schizophrenia

    Alana M. Shepherd;Sandra L. Matheson;Kristin R. Laurens;Kristin R. Laurens;Vaughan J. Carr

  • Social cognition, empathy and functional outcome in schizophrenia

    Amy Sparks;Skye McDonald;Bianca Lino;Bianca Lino;Maryanne O'Donnell

  • Psychotic-like experiences in a community sample of 8000 children aged 9 to 11 years: an item response theory analysis

    Kristin Laurens;Megan Hobbs;Mathew Sunderland;Melissa Green

  • The Genetics of the Mood Disorder Spectrum: Genome-wide Association Analyses of More Than 185,000 Cases and 439,000 Controls

    Jonathan R I Coleman;Héléna A Gaspar;Julien Bryois

  • Genome wide meta-analysis identifies genomic relationships, novel loci, and pleiotropic mechanisms across eight psychiatric disorders

    Lee Ph;Anttila;Won H

Frequent Co-Authors

Vaughan J. Carr
Vaughan J. Carr University of New South Wales
Kristin R. Laurens
Kristin R. Laurens Queensland University of Technology
Philip B. Mitchell
Philip B. Mitchell University of New South Wales
Murray J. Cairns
Murray J. Cairns University of Newcastle Australia
Janice M. Fullerton
Janice M. Fullerton University of New South Wales
Bernhard T. Baune
Bernhard T. Baune University of Münster
Peter R. Schofield
Peter R. Schofield Neuroscience Research Australia
Rhoshel K. Lenroot
Rhoshel K. Lenroot University of New South Wales
Gloria Roberts
Gloria Roberts University of New South Wales
Per Hoffmann
Per Hoffmann University of Bonn

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of online degrees and career pathways, many of which offer flexible options for students and working professionals. Earning a degree online can be the first step towards careers in mental health counseling, social work, or specialized therapy.

One popular option is becoming a marriage and family therapist (MFT). Each state and city may have unique steps, so understanding specific requirements is crucial. For prospective professionals, learning about the Toledo mft certification requirements or the Tucson mft certification requirements can help map out the journey ahead. Similarly, resources on how to become a marriage and family therapist in Tulsa and how to become a marriage and family therapist in Virginia Beach provide essential guidance for those targeting specific regions.

When selecting an online program, ensure it meets licensure criteria for your intended state. Researching career pathways and certification requirements in advance will make your educational journey in psychology smoother and more focused on your goals.

Best Scientists Citing Melissa J. Green

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles