World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
50
Citations
8790
World Ranking
5766
National Ranking
338

Tutis Vilis publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tutis Vilis sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 107 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Tutis Vilis D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tutis Vilis sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tutis Vilis is affiliated with the University of Western Ontario in Canada. Their academic profile indicates active involvement in research, though specific details on publications, co-authors, or research topics are not documented in the available data.

The absence of records on recent papers, frequent co-authors, and established publication venues suggests that public bibliographic details or indexed repositories currently lack comprehensive entries for this researcher. Similarly, no listed book publications provide further context on scholarly contributions through monographs or edited volumes.

This scientist's fields and subfields of study are not explicitly identified in the current data set. Likewise, no details of main topics of work or documented awards are included. The lack of these specifics might reflect data limitations rather than the scope of their research activities.

Based on the provided information, it can be noted that Tutis Vilis is an active academic associated with a recognized university, which implies engagement in scholarly pursuits consistent with higher education research standards.

Best Publications

  • Gaze-Centered Updating of Visual Space in Human Parietal Cortex

    W. Pieter Medendorp;Herbert C. Goltz;Tutis Vilis;J. Douglas Crawford

  • Geometric relations of eye position and velocity vectors during saccades.

    Douglas Tweed;Tutis Vilis

  • Implications of rotational kinematics for the oculomotor system in three dimensions

    D. Tweed;T. Vilis

  • A comparison of frontoparietal fMRI activation during anti-saccades and anti-pointing.

    Jason D. Connolly;Melvyn A. Goodale;Joseph F. X. Desouza;Ravi S. Menon;Ravi S. Menon

  • Distinguishing Subregions of the Human MT+ Complex Using Visual Fields and Pursuit Eye Movements

    Sean P. Dukelow;Joseph F. X. DeSouza;Jody C. Culham;Albert V. van den Berg

  • Computing three-dimensional eye position quaternions and eye velocity from search coil signals.

    Douglas Tweed;Werner Cadera;Tutis Vilis

  • A reexamination of the gain of the vestibuloocular reflex

    E. Viirre;D. Tweed;K. Milner;T. Vilis

  • Axes of eye rotation and Listing's law during rotations of the head

    J. D. Crawford;T. Vilis

  • Generation of torsional and vertical eye position signals by the interstitial nucleus of Cajal

    JD Crawford;W Cadera;T Vilis

  • Integration of Target and Effector Information in Human Posterior Parietal Cortex for the Planning of Action

    W. Pieter Medendorp;Herbert C. Goltz;J. Douglas Crawford;Tutis Vilis

  • Characteristics of saccadic dysmetria in monkeys during reversible lesions of medial cerebellar nuclei

    T. Vilis;J. Hore

  • Rotation of Listing's plane during vergence.

    D. Mok;A. Ro;W. Cadera;J.D. Crawford

  • Eye position signal modulates a human parietal pointing region during memory-guided movements.

    Joseph F. X. DeSouza;Sean P. Dukelow;Joseph S. Gati;Ravi S. Menon

  • Inhibition and generation of saccades: rapid event-related fMRI of prosaccades, antisaccades, and nogo trials.

    Matthew R.G. Brown;Herbert C. Goltz;Herbert C. Goltz;Tutis Vilis;Kristen A. Ford

  • Frontoparietal activation with preparation for antisaccades.

    Matthew R. G. Brown;Tutis Vilis;Stefan Everling

  • “Active” and “passive” learning of three-dimensional object structure within an immersive virtual reality environment

    K. H. James;G. K. Humphrey;T. Vilis;B. Corrie

  • Human Parietal “Reach Region” Primarily Encodes Intrinsic Visual Direction, Not Extrinsic Movement Direction, in a Visual–Motor Dissociation Task

    Juan Fernandez-Ruiz;Herbert C. Goltz;Herbert C. Goltz;Herbert C. Goltz;Joseph F. X. DeSouza;Joseph F. X. DeSouza;Tutis Vilis;Tutis Vilis

  • Loss of set in muscle responses to limb perturbations during cerebellar dysfunction.

    J. Hore;T. Vilis

  • Central neural mechanisms contributing to cerebellar tremor produced by limb perturbations.

    T. Vilis;J. Hore

  • Recovery of fMRI Activation in Motion Area MT Following Storage of the Motion Aftereffect

    Jody C. Culham;Sean P. Dukelow;Tutis Vilis;Frank A. Hassard

  • Adaptation of saccadic and vestibulo-ocular systems after extraocular muscle tenectomy.

    R Snow;J Hore;T Vilis

Frequent Co-Authors

Douglas B. Tweed
Douglas B. Tweed University of Toronto
J. Douglas Crawford
J. Douglas Crawford York University
Ravi S. Menon
Ravi S. Menon University of Western Ontario
Jody C. Culham
Jody C. Culham University of Western Ontario
Melvyn A. Goodale
Melvyn A. Goodale University of Western Ontario
W. Pieter Medendorp
W. Pieter Medendorp Radboud University
Sean P. Dukelow
Sean P. Dukelow University of Calgary
Stefan Everling
Stefan Everling University of Western Ontario
Denise Y. P. Henriques
Denise Y. P. Henriques York University
Joseph S. Gati
Joseph S. Gati University of Western Ontario

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Tutis Vilis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles