World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
40
Citations
6105
World Ranking
8115
National Ranking
684

Michael Fetter publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Fetter sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 91 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Michael Fetter D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Fetter sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Rhythmic auditory stimulation improves gait more than NDT/Bobath training in near-ambulatory patients early poststroke: a single-blind, randomized trial.

    M.H. Thaut;A.K. Leins;R.R. Rice;H. Argstatter

  • Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia type I Clinical features and MRI in families with SCA1, SCA2 and SCA3

    K. Bürk;M. Abele;M. Fetter;J. Dichgans

  • Vestibular neuritis spares the inferior division of the vestibular nerve

    M. Fetter;J. Dichgans

  • Head-shaking nystagmus in patients with unilateral peripheral vestibular lesions.

    T.C. Hain;T.C. Hain;M. Fetter;D.S. Zee

  • Recovery from unilateral labyrinthectomy in rhesus monkey

    M. Fetter;D. S. Zee

  • Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia type I: oculomotor abnormalities in families with SCA1, SCA2, and SCA3.

    Bürk K;Fetter M;Abele M;Laccone F

  • Rotational kinematics of the human vestibuloocular reflex. III. Listing's Law

    H. Misslisch;D. Tweed;M. Fetter;D. Sievering

  • The interactive contribution of neck muscle proprioception and vestibular stimulation to subjective “straight ahead” orientation in man

    H O Karnath;D Sievering;M Fetter

  • Three-dimensional properties of human pursuit eye movements.

    D. Tweed;M. Fetter;S. Andreadaki;E. Koenig

  • Saccade velocity is controlled by polyglutamine size in spinocerebellar ataxia 2

    Luis Velázquez-Pérez;Carola Seifried;Nieves Santos-Falcón;Michael Abele

  • Ocular exploration of space as a function of neck proprioceptive and vestibular input — observations in normal subjects and patients with spatial neglect after parietal lesions

    H. O. Karnath;M. Fetter;J. Dichgans

  • Ocular space exploration in the dark and its relation to subjective and objective body orientation in neglect patients with parietal lesions

    Hans-Otto Karnath;Michael Fetter

  • Rotational kinematics of the human vestibuloocular reflex. I. Gain matrices

    D. Tweed;D. Sievering;H. Misslisch;M. Fetter

  • Dissociation between the perception of body verticality and the visual vertical in acute peripheral vestibular disorder in humans

    Dimitri Anastasopoulos;Thomas Haslwanter;Adolfo Bronstein;Michael Fetter

  • The motor side of depth vision.

    Kai Schreiber;Kai Schreiber;J. Douglas Crawford;J. Douglas Crawford;Michael Fetter;Douglas Tweed;Douglas Tweed;Douglas Tweed

  • Saccade velocity is reduced in presymptomatic spinocerebellar ataxia type 2

    L. Velázquez-Pérez;C. Seifried;M. Abele;F. Wirjatijasa

  • The perception of body orientation after neck-proprioceptive stimulation. Effects of time and of visual cueing.

    H. O. Karnath;E. Reich;C. Rorden;M. Fetter

  • Optimizing Gaze Control in Three Dimensions

    Douglas Tweed;Thomas Haslwanter;Michael Fetter

  • Testing models of the oculomotor velocity-to-position transformation.

    D. Tweed;H. Misslisch;M. Fetter

  • The Role of Somatosensory Input for the Perception of Verticality

    Dimitri Anastasopoulos;Dimitri Anastasopoulos;Adolfo Bronstein;Thomas Haslwanter;Michael Fetter

  • Effect of lack of vision and of occipital lobectomy upon recovery from unilateral labyrinthectomy in rhesus monkey

    M. Fetter;D. S. Zee;L. R. Proctor

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas Klockgether
Thomas Klockgether German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases
Ulf Ziemann
Ulf Ziemann University of Tübingen
Georg Auburger
Georg Auburger Goethe University Frankfurt
Hans-Otto Karnath
Hans-Otto Karnath University of Tübingen
J. Douglas Crawford
J. Douglas Crawford York University
David S. Zee
David S. Zee Johns Hopkins University
Alexis Brice
Alexis Brice Institut du Cerveau
Laurence R. Harris
Laurence R. Harris York University
Tutis Vilis
Tutis Vilis University of Western Ontario
Ullrich Wüllner
Ullrich Wüllner University Hospital Bonn

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Neuroscience can open doors to a range of diverse and rewarding career paths. Many students interested in this field explore flexible online programs that can complement neuroscience or pivot into related professions.

For those drawn to the intersection of mental health, behavioral science, and social work, pursuing cheapest online master's in social work degrees or enrolling in bcba degree programs may be appealing options. These paths lead to fulfilling roles in support, therapy, and behavioral analysis.

To fast-track your education, investigate 1 year msw programs and other accelerated degrees. For example, accelerated psychology programs online allow students to efficiently gain credentials needed for careers in psychology, counseling, and related fields.

Exploring these alternative online and accelerated degree options can help you diversify your qualifications and expand your potential career opportunities in neuroscience and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Fetter

Recently Published Articles