World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
57
Citations
12632
World Ranking
4032
National Ranking
265

Neuroscience

D-Index
59
Citations
13539
World Ranking
3983
National Ranking
231

Jody C. Culham publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jody C. Culham sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 194 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Jody C. Culham D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jody C. Culham sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jody C. Culham is a researcher affiliated with the University of Western Ontario in Canada, with a focus on neuroscience and psychology. Their work spans multiple subfields, including cognitive neuroscience, social psychology, developmental and educational psychology, human-computer interaction, and computer vision and pattern recognition.

Their research topics cover diverse areas such as action observation and synchronization, visual perception and processing mechanisms, motor control and adaptation, face recognition and perception, child and animal learning development, neural and behavioral psychology studies, and applications and impacts of virtual reality.

Jody C. Culham has contributed to numerous scientific publications, with frequent appearances in venues such as the Journal of Vision, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Journal of Neuroscience, and Neuropsychologia.

Among their recent papers are:

  • The Treachery of Images: How Realism Influences Brain and Behavior, 2021, Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • Decoding motor imagery and action planning in the early visual cortex: Overlapping but distinct neural mechanisms, 2020, NeuroImage
  • The toolish hand illusion: embodiment of a tool based on similarity with the hand, 2021, Scientific Reports
  • Familiar size affects perception differently in virtual reality and the real world, 2022, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  • Familiar size affects the perceived size and distance of real objects even with binocular vision, 2021, Journal of Vision

Frequent collaborators in their research include Karsten Babin, Kevin Stubbs, Gudrun Schwarzer, Yuqi Liu, and Laurie M. Wilcox.

Best Publications

  • Neuroimaging of cognitive functions in human parietal cortex

    Jody C Culham;Nancy G Kanwisher

  • Visually guided grasping produces fMRI activation in dorsal but not ventral stream brain areas

    Jody C. Culham;Stacey L. Danckert;Joseph F. X. Desouza;Joseph S. Gati

  • Human parietal cortex in action.

    Jody C Culham;Kenneth F Valyear

  • Ventral occipital lesions impair object recognition but not object-directed grasping: an fMRI study.

    Thomas W. James;Jody Culham;G. Keith Humphrey;A. David Milner

  • Cortical fMRI activation produced by attentive tracking of moving targets

    Jody C. Culham;Stephan A. Brandt;Stephan A. Brandt;Patrick Cavanagh;Nancy G. Kanwisher

  • The role of parietal cortex in visuomotor control: what have we learned from neuroimaging?

    Jody C. Culham;Cristiana Cavina-Pratesi;Anthony Singhal

  • Attention response functions: characterizing brain areas using fMRI activation during parametric variations of attentional load.

    Jody C Culham;Patrick Cavanagh;Nancy G Kanwisher;Nancy G Kanwisher

  • Distinguishing Subregions of the Human MT+ Complex Using Visual Fields and Pursuit Eye Movements

    Sean P. Dukelow;Joseph F. X. DeSouza;Jody C. Culham;Albert V. van den Berg

  • Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reveals the Neural Substrates of Arm Transport and Grip Formation in Reach-to-Grasp Actions in Humans

    Cristiana Cavina-Pratesi;Simona Monaco;Patrizia Fattori;Claudio Galletti

  • Decoding Action Intentions from Preparatory Brain Activity in Human Parieto-frontal Networks

    Jason P Gallivan;D Adam McLean;Kenneth F Valyear;Charles E Pettypiece

  • The fusiform face area is not sufficient for face recognition: Evidence from a patient with dense prosopagnosia and no occipital face area

    Jennifer K E Steeves;Jody C Culham;Bradley C Duchaine;Cristiana Cavina Pratesi

  • Neural coding within human brain areas involved in actions

    Jason P Gallivan;Jody C Culham

  • Is That within Reach? fMRI Reveals That the Human Superior Parieto-Occipital Cortex Encodes Objects Reachable by the Hand

    Jason P. Gallivan;Cristiana Cavina-Pratesi;Jody C. Culham

  • Decoding the neural mechanisms of human tool use

    Jason P Gallivan;D Adam McLean;Kenneth F Valyear;Jody C Culham

  • A double dissociation between sensitivity to changes in object identity and object orientation in the ventral and dorsal visual streams: A human fMRI study

    Kenneth F. Valyear;Jody C. Culham;Nadder Sharif;David Westwood

  • Reaching for the unknown: multiple target encoding and real-time decision-making in a rapid reach task

    Craig S. Chapman;Jason P. Gallivan;Daniel K. Wood;Jennifer L. Milne

  • Bringing the real world into the fMRI scanner: repetition effects for pictures versus real objects.

    Jacqueline C. Snow;Charles E. Pettypiece;Teresa D. McAdam;Adam D. McLean

  • Decoding Effector-Dependent and Effector-Independent Movement Intentions from Human Parieto-Frontal Brain Activity

    Jason P. Gallivan;D. Adam McLean;Fraser W. Smith;Jody C. Culham

  • fMRI reveals a preference for near viewing in the human parieto-occipital cortex

    D. J. Quinlan;Jody C. Culham

  • Where One Hand Meets the Other: Limb-Specific and Action-Dependent Movement Plans Decoded from Preparatory Signals in Single Human Frontoparietal Brain Areas

    Jason P. Gallivan;Jason P. Gallivan;D. Adam McLean;J. Randall Flanagan;Jody C. Culham;Jody C. Culham

  • FMRI Reveals a Dissociation between Grasping and Perceiving the Size of Real 3D Objects

    Cristiana Cavina-Pratesi;Melvyn A. Goodale;Jody C. Culham

Frequent Co-Authors

Melvyn A. Goodale
Melvyn A. Goodale University of Western Ontario
Jason P. Gallivan
Jason P. Gallivan Queen's University
Tutis Vilis
Tutis Vilis University of Western Ontario
Ravi S. Menon
Ravi S. Menon University of Western Ontario
Marlene Behrmann
Marlene Behrmann Carnegie Mellon University
David C. Plaut
David C. Plaut Carnegie Mellon University
A. David Milner
A. David Milner Durham University
Patrick Cavanagh
Patrick Cavanagh York University
Jessica K. Witt
Jessica K. Witt Colorado State University
Heidi Johansen-Berg
Heidi Johansen-Berg University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience in the USA can open doors to a variety of career paths in mental health, counseling, and behavioral sciences. For those interested in combining neuroscience knowledge with direct client work, there are several related online degrees to consider.

If you're looking to provide mental health support, exploring cacrep-accredited online counseling programs ensures you meet rigorous industry standards. For students prioritizing affordability, some of the cheapest counseling degree online options provide quality education without a high price tag.

Those with a passion for strengthening relationships may pursue a marriage and family therapy degree online, blending psychological insights with practical skills for supporting families and couples. Additionally, scientists and aspiring clinicians alike can benefit from pursuing the cheapest online master's in psychology for a strong foundation in research and theory.

Exploring these online degree pathways can help neuroscience students expand their expertise and career opportunities within the fast-growing fields of mental health and therapy.

Best Scientists Citing Jody C. Culham

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles