World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
39
Citations
7764
World Ranking
8498
National Ranking
4548

Neuroscience

D-Index
39
Citations
7869
World Ranking
8261
National Ranking
3542

Bradford Z. Mahon publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bradford Z. Mahon sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 106 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Bradford Z. Mahon D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bradford Z. Mahon sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bradford Z. Mahon is affiliated with Carnegie Mellon University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Neuroscience, Medicine, and Psychology, with focused expertise in several subfields including Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Epidemiology.

Their research addresses a variety of topics related to brain function and cognition, such as:

  • Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Language, Metaphor, and Cognition

Among Bradford Z. Mahon's recent published papers are:

  • "Reciprocal interactions among parietal and occipito-temporal representations support everyday object-directed actions" (2024), published in Neuropsychologia
  • "What we mean when we say semantic: Toward a multidisciplinary semantic glossary" (2024), published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • "Intraoperative cortical localization of music and language reveals signatures of structural complexity in posterior temporal cortex" (2023), published in iScience
  • "What tool representation, intuitive physics, and action have in common: The brain's first-person physics engine" (2021), published in Cognitive Neuropsychology
  • "Interactions between language, thought, and perception: Cognitive and neural perspectives" (2020), published in Cognitive Neuropsychology

Frequent co-authors include:

  • Frank E. Garcea (5 publications)
  • Webster H. Pilcher (4 publications)
  • Emma Strawderman (4 publications)
  • Steven P. Meyers (4 publications)
  • Benjamin L. Chernoff (3 publications)

Bradford Z. Mahon's work has appeared regularly in venues such as:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) - 4 publications
  • Cognitive Neuropsychology - 2 publications
  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • Neuropsychologia
  • iScience

Best Publications

  • A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content

    Bradford Z. Mahon;Alfonso Caramazza;Alfonso Caramazza

  • What are the facts of semantic category-specific deficits? A critical review of the clinical evidence.

    Erminio Capitani;M. Laiacona;B. Mahon;A. Caramazza

  • Concepts and Categories: A Cognitive Neuropsychological Perspective

    Bradford Z. Mahon;Alfonso Caramazza

  • Lexical selection is not by competition: a reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm.

    Bradford Z. Mahon;Albert Costa;Robin Peterson;Kimberly A. Vargas

  • The organization of conceptual knowledge: the evidence from category-specific semantic deficits.

    Alfonso Caramazza;Bradford Z. Mahon

  • What drives the organization of object knowledge in the brain

    Bradford Z. Mahon;Alfonso Caramazza;Alfonso Caramazza

  • Category-specific organization in the human brain does not require visual experience.

    Bradford Z. Mahon;Bradford Z. Mahon;Bradford Z. Mahon;Stefano Anzellotti;Stefano Anzellotti;Jens Schwarzbach;Massimiliano Zampini

  • Action-Related Properties Shape Object Representations in the Ventral Stream

    Bradford Z. Mahon;Bradford Z. Mahon;Shawn C. Milleville;Gioia A.L. Negri;Raffaella I. Rumiati

  • What is the role of motor simulation in action and object recognition? Evidence from apraxia

    Gioia A. L. Negri;Raffaella I. Rumiati;Antonietta Zadini;Maja Ukmar

  • What is embodied about cognition

    Bradford Z. Mahon

  • The orchestration of the sensory-motor systems: Clues from Neuropsychology.

    Bradford Z. Mahon;Alfonso Caramazza

  • Unconscious processing dissociates along categorical lines

    Jorge Almeida;Bradford Z. Mahon;Ken Nakayama;Alfonso Caramazza

  • The organisation of conceptual knowledge in the brain: The future's past and some future directions.

    Alfonso Caramazza;Bradford Z. Mahon

  • The Role of the Dorsal Visual Processing Stream in Tool Identification

    Jorge Manuel Almeida;Bradford Z. Mahon;Bradford Z. Mahon;Alfonso Caramazza

  • Semantic Interference in a Delayed Naming Task: Evidence for the Response Exclusion Hypothesis

    Niels Janssen;Walter Schirm;Bradford Z. Mahon;Alfonso Caramazza

  • The cumulative semantic cost does not reflect lexical selection by competition

    Eduardo Navarrete;Bradford Z. Mahon;Bradford Z. Mahon;Alfonso Caramazza;Alfonso Caramazza

  • Factors Determining Semantic Facilitation and Interference in the Cyclic Naming Paradigm

    Eduardo Navarrete;Paul Del Prato;Bradford Z. Mahon;Bradford Z. Mahon

  • Level of categorisation effect: A novel effect in the picture-word interference paradigm

    Albert Costa;Bradford Mahon;Virginia Savova;Alfonso Caramazza

  • Affect of the unconscious: Visually suppressed angry faces modulate our decisions

    Jorge Almeida;Petra E. Pajtas;Petra E. Pajtas;Bradford Z. Mahon;Ken Nakayama

  • Tool manipulation knowledge is retrieved by way of the ventral visual object processing pathway

    Jorge Almeida;Anat R. Fintzi;Bradford Z. Mahon

  • The Representation of Object-Directed Action and Function Knowledge in the Human Brain

    Quanjing Chen;Frank E. Garcea;Bradford Z. Mahon

  • Arguments about the nature of concepts: Symbols, embodiment, and beyond

    Bradford Z. Mahon;Gregory Hickok

  • Lexical selection is not by competition: Evidence from the blocked naming paradigm

    Eduardo Navarrete;Paul Del Prato;Francesca Peressotti;Bradford Z. Mahon;Bradford Z. Mahon

Frequent Co-Authors

Alfonso Caramazza
Alfonso Caramazza Harvard University
Óscar F. Gonçalves
Óscar F. Gonçalves University of Coimbra
Ken Nakayama
Ken Nakayama Harvard University
Jessica F. Cantlon
Jessica F. Cantlon Carnegie Mellon University
Albert Costa
Albert Costa Pompeu Fabra University
Raffaella I. Rumiati
Raffaella I. Rumiati International School for Advanced Studies
Robert A. Jacobs
Robert A. Jacobs University of Rochester
Yanchao Bi
Yanchao Bi Peking University
Adriana Sampaio
Adriana Sampaio University of Minho
Marcella Laiacona
Marcella Laiacona University of Milan

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Neuroscience, a range of related online degrees can open doors to rewarding careers in healthcare, research, and counseling. Many choose psychology as a foundational field—explore the most affordable online psychology degree programs to start a flexible and affordable journey.

For those aiming to support individuals and communities, online msw programs can lead to influential roles in social work and mental health. If clinical psychology is your goal, pursuing an online psyd program can help you become a licensed psychologist without relocating.

Additionally, students interested in relationship counseling or therapy may consider mft programs online to become a Marriage and Family Therapist. Each of these pathways is flexible, often combining rigorous coursework with practical experience, and can complement a background in Neuroscience. Choose the one that aligns with your career aspirations and time frame.

Best Scientists Citing Bradford Z. Mahon

Trending Scientists