World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 47 6164 5729 113 111 212 9196
Neuroscience 47 6404 5892 327 312 212 9196

Raffaella I. Rumiati publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Raffaella I. Rumiati between 1994 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Raffaella I. Rumiati published across 32 years, from 1994 to 2025, averaging 7.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2013. 22 of the 242 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2013. 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 19 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 14 publications
1994 2025

242 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Raffaella I. Rumiati: publications per year, 1994 to 2025
Year Publications
1994 1
1995 0
1996 0
1997 3
1998 4
1999 1
2000 2
2001 3
2002 7
2003 3
2004 7
2005 6
2006 5
2007 5
2008 4
2009 6
2010 5
2011 9
2012 12
2013 19
2014 9
2015 12
2016 16
2017 13
2018 12
2019 14
2020 9
2021 19
2022 10
2023 4
2024 8
2025 14
Total 242
Download as CSV

Raffaella I. Rumiati publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Raffaella I. Rumiati sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 211–220 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 212 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313 212
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Raffaella I. Rumiati D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Raffaella I. Rumiati sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495 47
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Raffaella I. Rumiati is affiliated with the International School for Advanced Studies in Italy. Their research spans significant areas within neuroscience and psychology, with a primary focus on cognitive neuroscience and related subfields.

The main fields of study associated with their work include:

  • Neuroscience
  • Psychology

Within these domains, their research further delves into specific subfields:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Social Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental Health
  • Clinical Psychology

The researcher's work addresses multiple key topics, which include:

  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Face Recognition and Perception

Raffaella I. Rumiati has contributed to several recent publications spanning a variety of journals. Selected papers from recent years are:

  • "Protective factors for subjective cognitive decline individuals: trajectories and changes in a longitudinal study with Italian elderly," 2021, European Journal of Neurology
  • "Effect of body-part specificity and meaning in gesture imitation in left hemisphere stroke patients," 2020, Neuropsychologia
  • "Out of control: An altered parieto-occipital-cerebellar network for impulsivity in bipolar disorder," 2021, Behavioural Brain Research
  • "The Neural Signatures of Shame, Embarrassment, and Guilt: A Voxel-Based Meta-Analysis on Functional Neuroimaging Studies," 2023, Brain Sciences
  • "Psychological Impact in Healthcare Workers During Emergencies: The Italian Experience With COVID-19 First Wave," 2022, Frontiers in Psychiatry

The frequent publication venues where Rumiati's work appears include:

  • NeuroImage
  • Scientific Reports
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Appetite
  • Neuropsychologia

Raffaella I. Rumiati has collaborated extensively with a number of coauthors, including:

  • Elisabetta Pisanu
  • Alessandro Grecucci
  • Luca Piretti
  • Marilena Aiello
  • Tania Cerni

Best Publications

  • Executive function profile of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

    Tim Shallice;Gian Marco Marzocchi;Silvano Coser;Maria Del Savio

  • Registered Replication Report: Strack, Martin, & Stepper (1988)

    E. J. Wagenmakers;Titia Beek;Laura Dijkhoff;Quentin F. Gronau

  • Action-Related Properties Shape Object Representations in the Ventral Stream

    Bradford Z. Mahon;Bradford Z. Mahon;Shawn C. Milleville;Gioia A.L. Negri;Raffaella I. Rumiati

  • What is the role of motor simulation in action and object recognition? Evidence from apraxia

    Gioia A. L. Negri;Raffaella I. Rumiati;Antonietta Zadini;Maja Ukmar

  • Effects of TMS on Different Stages of Motor and Non-Motor Verb Processing in the Primary Motor Cortex

    Liuba Papeo;Antonino Vallesi;Alessio Isaja;Raffaella Ida Rumiati

  • Neural basis of pantomiming the use of visually presented objects.

    Raffaella Ida Rumiati;Peter H. Weiss;Tim Shallice;Giovanni Ottoboni

  • Neuropsychological evidence for a strategic control of multiple routes in imitation.

    Alessia Tessari;Nicola Canessa;Maja Ukmar;Raffaella I. Rumiati

  • A form of ideational apraxia as a delective deficit of contention scheduling.

    Raffaella I. Rumiati;Sergio Zanini;Lorenza Vorano;Tim Shallice

  • Common and Differential Neural Mechanisms Supporting Imitation of Meaningful and Meaningless Actions

    Raffaella I. Rumiati;Peter H. Weiss;Alessia Tessari;Ann Assmus

  • Recognition by action: dissociating visual and semantic routes to action in normal observers.

    Raffaella I. Rumiati;Glyn W. Humphreys

  • Disentangling self- and fairness- related neural mechanisms involved in the Ultimatum Game: an fMRI study.

    Corrado Corradi-Dell'Acqua;Claudia Civai;Raffaella I. Rumiati;Gereon R. Fink

  • Imitation of novel and well-known actions: the role of short-term memory.

    Raffaella Ida Rumiati;Alessia Tessari

  • The FoodCast research image database (FRIDa)

    Francesco Foroni;Giulio Pergola;Georgette Argiris;Raffaella I. Rumiati

  • The selective impairment of the phonological output buffer

    Tim Shallice;Raffaella I. Rumiati;Antonella Zadini

  • The strategic control of multiple routes in imitation of actions.

    Alessia Tessari;Raffaella Ida Rumiati

  • Are irrational reactions to unfairness truly emotionally-driven? Dissociated behavioural and emotional responses in the Ultimatum Game task.

    Claudia Civai;Corrado Corradi-Dell’Acqua;Matthias Gamer;Raffaella I. Rumiati;Raffaella I. Rumiati

  • On the Links between Visual Knowledge and Naming: a Single Case Study of a Patient with a Category-specific Impairment for Living Things

    E.M.E. Forde;D. Francis;M.J. Riddoch;R.I. Rumiati

  • Imitation of novel and well-known actions

    Raffaella Ida Rumiati;Alessia Tessari

  • Equality versus self-interest in the brain: Differential roles of anterior insula and medial prefrontal cortex

    Claudia Civai;Cristiano Crescentini;Aldo Rustichini;Raffaella Ida Rumiati

  • AGNOSIA WITHOUT PROSOPAGNOSIA OR ALEXIA: EVIDENCE FOR STORED VISUAL MEMORIES SPECIFIC TO OBJECTS

    Glyn W Humphreys;Raffaella I Rumiati

Frequent Co-Authors

Roberto Eleopra
Roberto Eleopra Misericordia University
Glyn W. Humphreys
Glyn W. Humphreys University of Oxford
Tim Shallice
Tim Shallice University College London
Paolo Manganotti
Paolo Manganotti University of Trieste
Micah M. Murray
Micah M. Murray University of Lausanne
Gereon R. Fink
Gereon R. Fink University of Cologne
Gian Luigi Gigli
Gian Luigi Gigli University of Udine
Alfonso Caramazza
Alfonso Caramazza Harvard University
Iring Koch
Iring Koch RWTH Aachen University
Michela Sarlo
Michela Sarlo University of Urbino

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience study in the USA opens up diverse academic and career opportunities. For those seeking flexible educational options, online learning can be a valuable pathway. Many students consider certifications online that provide practical skills and can lead to well-paying jobs in healthcare, research, and behavioral sciences.

If you're looking for broader academic credentials, there are easy online degrees which may help you enter allied fields related to neuroscience, such as psychology or health administration. Cost is often a deciding factor, and options like the cheapest online master's in social work let you advance your expertise without taking on excessive student debt.

For those specifically interested in behavioral sciences, pursuing bcba coursework online can prepare you for certification and roles working with individuals with behavioral or developmental challenges. Comparing different pathways, accreditations, and affordability is key when planning your next academic or professional step in neuroscience and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Raffaella I. Rumiati

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles