World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
34
Citations
4468
World Ranking
10258
National Ranking
94

François Osiurak publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where François Osiurak sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 203 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

François Osiurak D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where François Osiurak sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Grasping the affordances, understanding the reasoning: toward a dialectical theory of human tool use.

    François Osiurak;Christophe Jarry;Didier Le Gall

  • Tool use and affordance: Manipulation-based versus reasoning-based approaches.

    François Osiurak;Arnaud Badets

  • What is an affordance? 40 years later.

    François Osiurak;François Osiurak;Yves Rossetti;Arnaud Badets

  • On the neurocognitive origins of human tool use : A critical review of neuroimaging data.

    Emanuelle Reynaud;Mathieu Lesourd;Jordan Navarro;François Osiurak;François Osiurak

  • The elephant in the room: What matters cognitively in cumulative technological culture.

    François Osiurak;Emanuelle Reynaud

  • Unusual use of objects after unilateral brain damage: the technical reasoning model.

    François Osiurak;Christophe Jarry;Philippe Allain;Ghislaine Aubin

  • What Neuropsychology Tells us About Human Tool Use? The Four Constraints Theory (4CT): Mechanics, Space, Time, and Effort

    François Osiurak

  • Apraxia of tool use: More evidence for the technical reasoning hypothesis

    Christophe Jarry;François Osiurak;David Delafuys;Valérie Chauviré

  • Acceptance and acceptability criteria: a literature review

    Boris Alexandre;Emanuelle Reynaud;François Osiurak;François Osiurak;Jordan Navarro;Jordan Navarro

  • Re-examining the gesture engram hypothesis. New perspectives on apraxia of tool use

    François Osiurak;Christophe Jarry;Didier Le Gall

  • Mechanical problem-solving strategies in left-brain damaged patients and apraxia of tool use

    François Osiurak;Christophe Jarry;Mathieu Lesourd;Josselin Baumard

  • Apraxia and Alzheimer’s Disease: Review and Perspectives

    Mathieu Lesourd;Didier Le Gall;Josselin Baumard;Bernard Croisile

  • Physical intelligence does matter to cumulative technological culture.

    François Osiurak;Emmanuel De Oliveira;Jordan Navarro;Mathieu Lesourd

  • Tool use disorders in neurodegenerative diseases: Roles of semantic memory and technical reasoning

    Josselin Baumard;Mathieu Lesourd;Christophe Jarry;Catherine Merck

  • Tool use and perceived distance: when unreachable becomes spontaneously reachable.

    François Osiurak;Nicolas Morgado;Richard Palluel-Germain;Richard Palluel-Germain

  • Object utilization and object usage: a single-case study.

    François Osiurak;Ghislaine Aubin;Philippe Allain;Christophe Jarry

  • Looking for intoolligence: A unified framework for the cognitive study of human tool use and technology.

    François Osiurak;Dietmar Heinke

  • Pliers, not fingers: Tool-action effect in a motor intention paradigm

    François Osiurak;Arnaud Badets

  • A goal-based mechanism for delayed motor intention: considerations from motor skills, tool use and action memory

    Arnaud Badets;François Osiurak

  • To Watch is to Work: a Review of NeuroImaging Data on Tool Use Observation Network.

    Emanuelle Reynaud;Jordan Navarro;Jordan Navarro;Mathieu Lesourd;François Osiurak;François Osiurak

Frequent Co-Authors

Yves Rossetti
Yves Rossetti Lyon Neuroscience Research Center
Stéphane Raffard
Stéphane Raffard University of Montpellier
Sarah R. Beck
Sarah R. Beck University of Birmingham
Sylvie Droit-Volet
Sylvie Droit-Volet University of Clermont Auvergne
Edouard Gentaz
Edouard Gentaz University of Geneva
Paolo Frigio Nichelli
Paolo Frigio Nichelli University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
Stephan Bohlhalter
Stephan Bohlhalter University of Bern
Marco Salvatore
Marco Salvatore Istituto Superiore di Sanità

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing François Osiurak

Recently Published Articles