World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
92
Citations
29246
World Ranking
11369
National Ranking
420

Marco Salvatore publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marco Salvatore sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 942 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Marco Salvatore D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marco Salvatore sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 92 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marco Salvatore is affiliated with the Istituto Superiore di Sanità in Italy. Their research spans a broad range of topics within medicine and related fields, focusing heavily on medical imaging, molecular biology, and cognitive neuroscience.

The primary fields of study for Salvatore include Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology. More specialized subfields of their work cover Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Molecular Biology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Cancer Research.

Their research topics reflect a strong engagement with advanced medical imaging and computational methods in diagnostics, including:

  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • MRI in cancer diagnosis
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • AI in cancer detection

Salvatore has contributed to numerous publications, with a recurring presence in journals such as Scientific Reports, Cancers, Diagnostics, Dose-Response, and Frontiers in Oncology. These venues illustrate consistent research activity in oncology, diagnostic technologies, and related biomedical fields.

Selected recent papers include:

  • Short-Chain Fatty Acids and Lipopolysaccharide as Mediators Between Gut Dysbiosis and Amyloid Pathology in Alzheimer's Disease, 2020, Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
  • Epigenetic-sensitive pathways in personalized therapy of major cardiovascular diseases, 2020, Pharmacology & Therapeutics
  • A peripheral signature of Alzheimer's disease featuring microbiota-gut-brain axis markers, 2023, Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
  • Assessment and Prediction of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: A Comparison of Imaging Modalities and Future Perspectives, 2021, Cancers
  • A machine learning model for supporting symptom-based referral and diagnosis of bronchitis and pneumonia in limited resource settings, 2021, Journal of Applied Biomedicine

Frequent collaborators in Salvatore's research include Carlo Cavaliere, Marco Aiello, Monica Franzese, Andrea Soricelli, and Valentina Brancato. These coauthors have worked on a variety of projects alongside Salvatore, indicating established professional partnerships.

Best Publications

  • Dobutamine Echocardiography Predicts Improvement of Hypoperfused Dysfunctional Myocardium After Revascularization in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

    Pasquale Perrone-Filardi;Leonardo Pace;Mariella Prastaro;Federico Piscione

  • Biobanking in health care: Evolution and future directions

    Luigi Coppola;Alessandra Cianflone;Anna Maria Grimaldi;Mariarosaria Incoronato

  • Short-Chain Fatty Acids and Lipopolysaccharide as Mediators Between Gut Dysbiosis and Amyloid Pathology in Alzheimer’s Disease

    Moira Marizzoni;Annamaria Cattaneo;Peppino Mirabelli;Cristina Festari

  • Assessment of Myocardial Viability in Patients With Chronic Coronary Artery Disease Rest–4-Hour–24-Hour 201Tl Tomography Versus Dobutamine Echocardiography

    Pasquale Perrone-Filardi;Leonardo Pace;Mariella Prastaro;Fiorenzo Squame

  • Cancer Cell Lines Are Useful Model Systems for Medical Research

    Peppino Mirabelli;Luigi Coppola;Marco Salvatore

  • Integrated Software for the Analysis of Brain PET/SPECT Studies with Partial-Volume-Effect Correction

    Mario Quarantelli;Karim Berkouk;Anna Prinster;Brigitte Landeau

  • Prolonged Impairment of Regional Contractile Function After Resolution of Exercise-Induced Angina Evidence of Myocardial Stunning in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

    Giuseppe Ambrosio;Giuseppe Ambrosio;Sandro Betocchi;Leonardo Pace;Maria Angela Losi

  • In vivo detection of multidrug-resistant (MDR1) phenotype by technetium-99m sestamibi scan in untreated breast cancer patients

    Silvana Del Vecchio;Andrea Ciarmiello;Maria I. Potena;Maria V. Carriero

  • Relationship between simultaneously acquired resting-state regional cerebral glucose metabolism and functional MRI: A PET/MR hybrid scanner study

    Marco Aiello;Elena Salvatore;Arnaud Cachia;Sabina Pappatà

  • Identification of viable myocardium in patients with chronic coronary artery disease: Comparison of thallium-201 scintigraphy with reinjection and technetium-99m-methoxyisobutyl isonitrile

    Alberto Cuocolo;Leonardo Pace;Bruno Ricciardelli;Massimo Chiariello

  • Grey matter loss in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a voxel-based morphometry study.

    A. Prinster;M. Quarantelli;G. Orefice;R. Lanzillo

  • Multicenter study of immunoscintigraphy with radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies in patients with melanoma.

    A. G. Siccardi;G. L. Buraggi;L. Callegaro;G. Mariani

  • Brain atrophy and lesion load in a large population of patients with multiple sclerosis

    G. Tedeschi;L. Lavorgna;P. Russo;A. Prinster

  • 18F-FDG PET/CT, 99mTc-MIBI, and MRI in evaluation of patients with multiple myeloma.

    Rosa Fonti;Barbara Salvatore;Mario Quarantelli;Cesare Sirignano

  • Tumor clearance of technetium 99m-sestamibi as a predictor of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer.

    A Ciarmiello;S Del Vecchio;P Silvestro;M I Potena

  • Urokinase Receptor Interacts with αvβ5 Vitronectin Receptor, Promoting Urokinase-dependent Cell Migration in Breast Cancer

    Maria V. Carriero;Silvana Del Vecchio;Monica Capozzoli;Paola Franco

  • Impaired cardiac reserve and exercise capacity in patients receiving long-term thyrotropin suppressive therapy with levothyroxine.

    Bernadette Biondi;Serafino Fazio;Alberto Cuocolo;Domenico Sabatini

  • Imaging of adrenal tumors using FDG PET: comparison of benign and malignant lesions.

    Simone Maurea;Ciro Mainolfi;Lucio Bazzicalupo;Maria Rosaria Panico

  • Characteristics, associations and outcome of partial agenesis of the corpus callosum in the fetus.

    P. Volpe;D. Paladini;M. Resta;A. Stanziano

  • Separation of Thyroidal Iodoproteins and Purification of Thyroglobulin by Gel Filtration and Density Gradient Centrifugation

    G. Salvatore;M. Salvatore;H.J. Cahnmann;J. Robbins

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrea Soricelli
Andrea Soricelli Parthenope University of Naples
Massimo Chiariello
Massimo Chiariello University of Naples Federico II
Marco Aiello
Marco Aiello University of Stuttgart
Gaetano Lombardi
Gaetano Lombardi University of Naples Federico II
Annamaria Colao
Annamaria Colao University of Naples Federico II
Bruno Trimarco
Bruno Trimarco University of Naples Federico II
Giovanni B. Frisoni
Giovanni B. Frisoni University of Geneva
Rosario Pivonello
Rosario Pivonello University of Naples Federico II
Jens Wiltfang
Jens Wiltfang University of Göttingen
Filippo Cademartiri
Filippo Cademartiri Fondazione Monasterio

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can be an excellent way for aspiring healthcare professionals to enter the field or expand their career options. For those without a previous nursing background, online bsn programs for non nurses provide an accessible route into nursing, often allowing students to balance their studies with other commitments.

Medical billing and coding is another popular pathway. Accredited medical billing and coding online schools that accept financial aid can make this option even more accessible, especially for students concerned about tuition costs.

For those seeking entry-level positions in nursing, some programs make the admissions process easier by eliminating standardized tests. An lpn program without teas test can provide a straightforward path for those interested in practical nursing without extra exam requirements.

Additionally, individuals interested in the administrative side of healthcare can consider a health care administration degree online, which is often available in accelerated formats to help graduates enter the workforce quickly.

Best Scientists Citing Marco Salvatore

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles