World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Beryl R. Benacerraf

Beryl R. Benacerraf

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 83 15728 14794 7915 7318 357 22541

Beryl R. Benacerraf publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Beryl R. Benacerraf between 1978 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Beryl R. Benacerraf published across 45 years, from 1978 to 2022, averaging 8 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 1995. 4 of the 358 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2022. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 1995. 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 5 publications 1985: 11 publications 1986: 9 publications 1987: 13 publications 1988: 16 publications 1989: 12 publications 1990: 7 publications 1991: 12 publications 1992: 23 publications 1993: 12 publications 1994: 19 publications 1995: 24 publications 1996: 16 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 3 publications
1978 2022

358 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Beryl R. Benacerraf: publications per year, 1978 to 2022
Year Publications
1978 1
1979 0
1980 0
1981 1
1982 0
1983 1
1984 5
1985 11
1986 9
1987 13
1988 16
1989 12
1990 7
1991 12
1992 23
1993 12
1994 19
1995 24
1996 16
1997 5
1998 8
1999 3
2000 9
2001 7
2002 10
2003 6
2004 4
2005 7
2006 11
2007 10
2008 7
2009 4
2010 15
2011 6
2012 3
2013 4
2014 6
2015 11
2016 3
2017 9
2018 7
2019 14
2020 3
2021 1
2022 3
Total 358
Download as CSV

Beryl R. Benacerraf publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Beryl R. Benacerraf sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 341–360 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 357 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922 357
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Beryl R. Benacerraf D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Beryl R. Benacerraf sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 82–83 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027 83
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Beryl R. Benacerraf is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States and has a research focus primarily within the field of Medicine. Their work spans various subfields including Surgery, Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, and Epidemiology.

The scientist's research encompasses several main topics, such as Endometriosis Research and Treatment, Ultrasound in Clinical Applications, Uterine Myomas and Treatments, Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions, Congenital Heart Disease Studies, Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies, and Radiology practices and education.

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Journal of Clinical Ultrasound
  • Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine

Some recently published papers authored or co-authored by Beryl R. Benacerraf are:

  • International survey finds majority of gynecologists are not aware of and do not utilize ultrasound techniques to diagnose and map endometriosis, 2020, Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Curriculum and Competency Assessment Program for Training Maternal-Fetal Medicine Fellows in the Performance of the Detailed Obstetric Ultrasound Examination, 2022, Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine
  • Curriculum and competency assessment program for training maternal-fetal medicine fellows in the performance of the detailed obstetric ultrasound examination, 2022, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Resolution brings women's health into focus, 2021, Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Issue Information, 2021, Journal of Clinical Ultrasound

Their frequent collaborators include Joanne Stone, Mary E. Norton, Reem Abu-Rustum, Bryann Bromley, and Karin Fuchs, each contributing to multiple co-authored publications alongside Benacerraf.

Best Publications

  • Systematic approach to sonographic evaluation of the pelvis in women with suspected endometriosis, including terms, definitions and measurements: a consensus opinion from the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group

    S. Guerriero;G. Condous;T. Van Den Bosch;L. Valentin

  • The development of human fetal hearing.

    Jason C. Birnholz;Beryl R. Benacerraf

  • Terms, definitions and measurements to describe sonographic features of myometrium and uterine masses: a consensus opinion from the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) group

    T. van den Bosch;M. Dueholm;F. P. G. Leone;Lil Valentin

  • Management of Asymptomatic Ovarian and Other Adnexal Cysts Imaged at US: Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference Statement

    Deborah Levine;Douglas L. Brown;Rochelle F. Andreotti;Beryl Benacerraf

  • Sonographic identification of second-trimester fetuses with Down's syndrome

    BR Benacerraf;R Gelman;FD Frigoletto

  • Evaluation of the Woman With Postmenopausal Bleeding: Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound–Sponsored Consensus Conference Statement

    Ruth B. Goldstein;Robert L. Bree;Carol B. Benson;Beryl R. Benacerraf

  • First-trimester hemoglobin A1 and risk for major malformation and spontaneous abortion in diabetic pregnancy.

    M F Greene;J W Hare;J P Cloherty;B R Benacerraf

  • O-RADS US Risk Stratification and Management System: A Consensus Guideline from the ACR Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Committee

    Rochelle F. Andreotti;Dirk Timmerman;Lori M. Strachowski;Wouter Froyman

  • Fetal echocardiography: accuracy and limitations in a population at high and low risk for heart defects.

    Bryann Bromley;Judy A. Estroff;Stephen P. Sanders;Richard Parad

  • Fetal pyelectasis: a possible association with Down syndrome.

    Beryl R. Benacerraf;James Mandell;Judith A. Estroff;Bernard L. Harlow

  • The genetic sonogram: a method of risk assessment for Down syndrome in the second trimester.

    Bryann Bromley;Ellice Lieberman;Thomas D. Shipp;Beryl R. Benacerraf

  • A sonographic sign for the detection in the second trimester of the fetus with Down's syndrome

    Beryl R. Benacerraf;Beryl R. Benacerraf;Vanessa A. Barss;Vanessa A. Barss;Lane A. Laboda;Lane A. Laboda

  • Comparison of serum CA 125, clinical impression, and ultrasound in the preoperative evaluation of ovarian masses.

    N J Finkler;B Benacerraf;P T Lavin;C Wojciechowski

  • Sonographic scoring index for prenatal detection of chromosomal abnormalities.

    B R Benacerraf;D Neuberg;B Bromley;F D Frigoletto

  • Sonographically estimated fetal weights: accuracy and limitation.

    Beryl R. Benacerraf;Rebecca Gelman;Rebecca Gelman;Fredric D. Frigoletto

  • A sonographic screening method for Down syndrome

    C. Lockwood;C. Lockwood;B. Benacerraf;B. Benacerraf;A. Krinsky;A. Krinsky;K. Blakemore;K. Blakemore

  • Adnexal masses during pregnancy: accuracy of sonographic diagnosis and outcome

    B Bromley;B Benacerraf

  • Subchorionic hemorrhage in first-trimester pregnancies: prediction of pregnancy outcome with sonography.

    G L Bennett;B Bromley;E Lieberman;B R Benacerraf

  • A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study evaluating the efficacy of leuprolide acetate depot in the treatment of uterine leiomyomata.

    Andrew J. Friedman;Debra Harrison-Atlas;Robert L. Barbieri;Beryl Benacerraf

  • The sonographic diagnosis of Dandy–Walker and Dandy–Walker variant: associated findings and outcomes

    Jeffrey L. Ecker;Thomas D. Shipp;Thomas D. Shipp;Bryann Bromley;Bryann Bromley;Beryl Benacerraf;Beryl Benacerraf

Frequent Co-Authors

Deborah Levine
Deborah Levine University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Carol B. Benson
Carol B. Benson Brigham and Women's Hospital
Lawrence D. Platt
Lawrence D. Platt University of California, Los Angeles
Ellice Lieberman
Ellice Lieberman Brigham and Women's Hospital
Felice Petraglia
Felice Petraglia University of Florence
Antonio Pellicer
Antonio Pellicer University of Valencia
Craig A. Peters
Craig A. Peters The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Bernard L. Harlow
Bernard L. Harlow Boston University
John C. Hobbins
John C. Hobbins University of Colorado Denver
Stephen P. Sanders
Stephen P. Sanders Boston Children's Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in medicine but exploring alternative healthcare careers or flexible learning options, there are a variety of accessible online degrees to consider. Pursuing a 3-year online pharmd can open doors to pharmacy practice and pharmaceutical research, providing a vital role in patient care.

For those interested in the administrative side of healthcare, an online mhi (Master's in Health Information Management) can lead to opportunities in data management, compliance, and health informatics. If your focus is more technical, earning a medical billing and coding certification cost is typically low, and certification offers a fast track to a critical support role in healthcare organizations.

Nursing also remains an in-demand pathway. For advanced practice, the cheapest online nurse practitioner programs allow you to study while you work, preparing you for higher clinical responsibilities and expanded career options.

These online programs offer flexible and affordable routes—perfect for students seeking practical entry points into the healthcare field beyond traditional medical school.

Best Scientists Citing Beryl R. Benacerraf

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles