World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
David Chitayat

David Chitayat

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
102
Citations
37929
World Ranking
1367
National Ranking
40

Medicine

D-Index
102
Citations
39410
World Ranking
7641
National Ranking
294

David Chitayat publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Chitayat sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 587 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

David Chitayat D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Chitayat sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 102 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

David Chitayat is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, encompassing a notable number of publications in these areas.

The subfields that characterize their work include Genetics, Molecular Biology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Surgery. These areas reflect a multidisciplinary approach to medical science and genetic research.

The main topics addressed in their research involve:

  • Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
  • Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
  • Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
  • Congenital heart defects research
  • Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • RNA modifications and cancer

David Chitayat has contributed to several scientific publications, including:

  • "Intrinsic Endocardial Defects Contribute to Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome" (2020), Cell Stem Cell
  • "Histone H3.3 beyond cancer: Germline mutations in Histone 3 Family 3A and 3B cause a previously unidentified neurodegenerative disorder in 46 patients" (2020), Science Advances
  • "Genome Sequencing as a Diagnostic Test in Children With Unexplained Medical Complexity" (2020), JAMA Network Open
  • "Haploinsufficiency of SF3B2 causes craniofacial microsomia" (2021), Nature Communications
  • "Mapping the cellular origin and early evolution of leukemia in Down syndrome" (2021), Science

Frequent coauthors who have collaborated extensively with David Chitayat include:

  • Patrick Shannon
  • Karen Chong
  • Maian Roifman
  • Shiri Shinar
  • Ebba Alkhunaizi

Their work has appeared in several publication venues multiple times, notably:

  • American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
  • Prenatal Diagnosis
  • Genetics in Medicine Open
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Clinical Genetics

Best Publications

  • Structural variation of chromosomes in autism spectrum disorder.

    Christian R. Marshall;Abdul Noor;John B. Vincent;Anath C. Lionel

  • Birth defects after maternal exposure to corticosteroids: prospective cohort study and meta-analysis of epidemiological studies

    Laura Park-Wyllie;Paolo Mazzotta;Anne Pastuszak;Myla E. Moretti

  • Mutations in the O-Mannosyltransferase Gene POMT1 Give Rise to the Severe Neuronal Migration Disorder Walker-Warburg Syndrome

    Daniel Beltrán Valero De Bernabé;Sophie Currier;Alice Steinbrecher;Jacopo Celli

  • Mutations in genes encoding ribonuclease H2 subunits cause Aicardi-Goutières syndrome and mimic congenital viral brain infection.

    Yanick J Crow;Yanick J Crow;Andrea Leitch;Bruce E Hayward;Anna Garner

  • Pharmacogenetics of morphine poisoning in a breastfed neonate of a codeine-prescribed mother.

    Gideon Koren;James Cairns;David Chitayat;Andrea Gaedigk

  • Characterization of human disease phenotypes associated with mutations in TREX1, RNASEH2A, RNASEH2B, RNASEH2C, SAMHD1, ADAR, and IFIH1.

    Yanick J. Crow;Diana S. Chase;Johanna Lowenstein Schmidt;Marcin Szynkiewicz

  • Fragile X premutation is a significant risk factor for premature ovarian failure: the International Collaborative POF in Fragile X study--preliminary data.

    Diane J Allingham-Hawkins;Riyana Babul-Hirji;David Chitayat;Jeanette J A Holden

  • Evidence for multi‐site closure of the neural tube in humans

    Margot I. Van Allen;Dagmar K. Kalousek;Gerold F. Chernoff;Diana Juriloff

  • Mutations in the transcription factor gene SOX18 underlie recessive and dominant forms of hypotrichosis-lymphedema-telangiectasia.

    Alexandre Irrthum;Koenraad Devriendt;David Chitayat;Gert Matthijs

  • Mutations in STRA6 cause a broad spectrum of malformations including anophthalmia, congenital heart defects, diaphragmatic hernia, alveolar capillary dysplasia, lung hypoplasia, and mental retardation

    Francesca Pasutto;Heinrich Sticht;Gerhard Hammersen;Gabriele Gillessen-Kaesbach

  • Parkes Weber syndrome, vein of galen aneurysmal malformation, and other fast-flow vascular anomalies are caused by RASA1 mutations

    Nicole Revencu;Laurence M. Boon;John B. Mulliken;Odile Enjolras

  • A 1.5 million-base pair inversion polymorphism in families with Williams-Beuren syndrome.

    Lucy R. Osborne;Martin Li;Barbara Pober;David Chitayat

  • p63 Gene mutations in EEC syndrome, limb-mammary syndrome, and isolated split hand-split foot malformation suggest a genotype-phenotype correlation

    Hans van Bokhoven;Ben C.J. Hamel;Mike Bamshad;Eugenio Sangiorgi

  • Utility of whole-exome sequencing for those near the end of the diagnostic odyssey: time to address gaps in care.

    S L Sawyer;T Hartley;D A Dyment;C L Beaulieu

  • Whole-genome sequencing expands diagnostic utility and improves clinical management in paediatric medicine

    Dimitri J. Stavropoulos;Daniele Merico;Rebekah Jobling;Sarah Bowdin

  • Mutations in the transmembrane natriuretic peptide receptor NPR-B impair skeletal growth and cause acromesomelic dysplasia, type Maroteaux

    Cynthia F. Bartels;Hülya Bükülmez;Hülya Bükülmez;Pius Padayatti;David K. Rhee

  • Heterozygous mutations in the gene encoding noggin affect human joint morphogenesis.

    Yaoqin Gong;Deborah Krakow;Deborah Krakow;Jose Marcelino;Douglas Wilkin

  • Discordant KCNQ1OT1 imprinting in sets of monozygotic twins discordant for Beckwith–Wiedemann syndrome

    Rosanna Weksberg;Cheryl Shuman;Oana Caluseriu;Adam C. Smith

  • Genotype–phenotype correlation in 1,507 families with congenital adrenal hyperplasia owing to 21-hydroxylase deficiency

    Maria I. New;Moolamannil Abraham;Brian Gonzalez;Miroslav Dumic

  • Mutations in EZH2 cause Weaver syndrome.

    William T. Gibson;William T. Gibson;Rebecca L. Hood;Rebecca L. Hood;Shing Hei Zhan;Dennis E. Bulman

Frequent Co-Authors

Rosanna Weksberg
Rosanna Weksberg University of Toronto
Stephen W. Scherer
Stephen W. Scherer University of Toronto
Sylvie Langlois
Sylvie Langlois University of British Columbia
Gideon Koren
Gideon Koren Brown University
Han G. Brunner
Han G. Brunner Radboud University
Peter N. Ray
Peter N. Ray University of Toronto
Christian R. Marshall
Christian R. Marshall University of Toronto
Lisa G. Shaffer
Lisa G. Shaffer Paw Print Genetics
Jill A. Rosenfeld
Jill A. Rosenfeld Baylor College of Medicine
Aleksander Hinek
Aleksander Hinek University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens doors to diverse careers, many of which benefit from specialized online degrees. For instance, health information management is a rapidly growing field that blends healthcare with technology and data. If you are seeking flexible education options, consider exploring health information management online programs, which can often be completed while working or managing other commitments.

Interested in the technical side of healthcare? Learn how long does it take to become a medical coder and find out what steps are involved in entering this in-demand profession. The medical billing and coding job outlook remains strong, offering stability and growth potential for those with an interest in healthcare administration.

If your passion lies in nutrition and wellness, consider pursuing online degrees in nutrition. These programs can provide advanced knowledge for roles in clinical nutrition, public health, or industry—all from the convenience of your home.

Best Scientists Citing David Chitayat

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles