World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
66
Citations
14208
World Ranking
2630
National Ranking
88

Peter N. Ray publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter N. Ray sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 192 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Peter N. Ray D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter N. Ray sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter N. Ray is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada and has contributed to research primarily within the fields of Medicine and Social Sciences. Their scholarly work spans several interconnected subfields, including Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Gender Studies, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Genetics, and Emergency Medical Services.

The scientist's research covers a range of topics, with a focus on Diversity and Career in Medicine, Medical Education and Admissions, Innovations in Medical Education, Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances, Tracheal and airway disorders, Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research, and Global Health Workforce Issues.

Peter N. Ray has authored several recent papers, including:

  • Navigating the American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE) Success: Insights From Pre-assessment Practices in Preparing Surgical Residents for Competitive Sub-specialties, 2024, Cureus
  • Whole-Exome Sequencing and Targeted Copy Number Analysis in Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia, 2020, UNC Libraries
  • A Comparative American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE) Performance Analysis Between International vs. Domestic Graduates and Doctor of Medicine (MD) vs. Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine (DO) Medical Degrees, 2024, Cureus

Their work is frequently published in venues such as Cureus and UNC Libraries. Peter N. Ray's collaborative efforts include frequent co-authors:

  • Armein Rahimpour
  • Missy Morrison
  • David Denning
  • Paul Bown
  • Rahman Barry

This profile reflects a multidisciplinary approach that encompasses clinical, educational, and public health perspectives. The scientist's research interest in medical education and career diversity indicates a focus on factors influencing healthcare workforce development and the academic progression of medical professionals.

Overall, Peter N. Ray's academic contributions integrate various specialized topics in medicine with social science dimensions, addressing both scientific and systemic aspects of healthcare delivery and education.

Best Publications

  • The Duchenne muscular dystrophy gene product is localized in sarcolemma of human skeletal muscle

    Elizabeth E. Zubrzycka-Gaarn;Dennis E. Bulman;George Karpati;Arthur H. M. Burghes

  • Identification of Proximal Spinal Muscular Atrophy Carriers and Patients by Analysis of SMNT and SMNC Gene Copy Number

    P.E. McAndrew;D.W. Parsons;L.R. Simard;C. Rochette

  • Whole-genome sequencing of quartet families with autism spectrum disorder

    Ryan K C Yuen;Bhooma Thiruvahindrapuram;Daniele Merico;Susan Walker

  • Improved diagnostic yield compared with targeted gene sequencing panels suggests a role for whole-genome sequencing as a first-tier genetic test.

    Anath C Lionel;Gregory Costain;Nasim Monfared;Susan Walker

  • Subgroup-Specific Prognostic Implications of TP53 Mutation in Medulloblastoma

    Nataliya Zhukova;Vijay Ramaswamy;Marc Remke;Elke Pfaff

  • Cloning of the breakpoint of an X;21 translocation associated with Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

    Peter N. Ray;Bonnie Belfall;Catherine Duff;Cairine Logan

  • Whole-genome sequencing expands diagnostic utility and improves clinical management in paediatric medicine

    Dimitri J. Stavropoulos;Daniele Merico;Rebekah Jobling;Sarah Bowdin

  • Frame-shift deletions in patients with Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy

    S. B. Malhotra;K. A. Hart;H. J. Klamut;N. S. T. Thomas

  • A cDNA clone from the Duchenne/Becker muscular dystrophy gene

    Arthur H. M. Burghes;Cairine Logan;Xiuyuan Hu;Bonnie Belfall

  • A novel dystrophin isoform is required for normal retinal electrophysiology

    Vinita N. D'Souza;Nguyen thi Man;Glenn E. Morris;Wolfram Karges

  • Duplicational mutation at the Duchenne muscular dystrophy locus: its frequency, distribution, origin, and phenotypegenotype correlation.

    Xiuyuang Hu;P. N. Ray;E. G. Murphy;M. W. Thompson

  • BRAF mutation and CDKN2A deletion define a clinically distinct subgroup of childhood secondary high-grade glioma

    Matthew Mistry;Matthew Mistry;Nataliya Zhukova;Daniele Merico;Patricia Rakopoulos

  • Tumor development in the Beckwith–Wiedemann syndrome is associated with a variety of constitutional molecular 11p15 alterations including imprinting defects of KCNQ1OT1

    Rosanna Weksberg;Joy Nishikawa;Oana Caluseriu;Yan-Ling Fei

  • Molecular and phenotypic analysis of patients with deletions within the deletion-rich region of the Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) gene.

    E. F. Gillard;J. S. Chamberlain;E. G. Murphy;C. L. Duff

  • PhenoTips: patient phenotyping software for clinical and research use.

    Marta Girdea;Sergiu Dumitriu;Marc Fiume;Sarah Bowdin

  • Universal Poor Survival in Children With Medulloblastoma Harboring Somatic TP53 Mutations

    Uri Tabori;Berivan Baskin;Mary Shago;Noa Alon

  • Dystrophin expression in the human retina is required for normal function as defined by electroretinography

    De Ann M. Pillers;Dennis E. Bulman;Richard G. Weleber;Dayle A. Sigesmund

  • TP53 Alterations Determine Clinical Subgroups and Survival of Patients With Choroid Plexus Tumors

    Uri Tabori;Adam Shlien;Berivan Baskin;Sarah Levitt

  • Recurrent focal copy-number changes and loss of heterozygosity implicate two noncoding RNAs and one tumor suppressor gene at chromosome 3q13.31 in osteosarcoma.

    Ivan Pasic;Adam Shlien;Adam D. Durbin;Dimitrios J. Stavropoulos

  • Human ribosomal RNA genes: orientation of the tandem array and conservation of the 5' end.

    Ronald G. Worton;Joanne Sutherland;James E. Sylvester;Huntington F. Willard

Frequent Co-Authors

Christian R. Marshall
Christian R. Marshall University of Toronto
Stephen W. Scherer
Stephen W. Scherer University of Toronto
Rosanna Weksberg
Rosanna Weksberg University of Toronto
Dennis E. Bulman
Dennis E. Bulman Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
David Chitayat
David Chitayat University of Toronto
Cynthia Hawkins
Cynthia Hawkins University of Toronto
Arthur H.M. Burghes
Arthur H.M. Burghes The Ohio State University
Uri Tabori
Uri Tabori University of Toronto
Daniele Merico
Daniele Merico University of Toronto
Eric Bouffet
Eric Bouffet University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Genetics in the USA can be an excellent foundation for a wide range of health and science careers. Many students with a background in genetics go on to work in research, healthcare, or even advanced nursing roles.

If you’re interested in combining your knowledge of genetics with nursing or clinical practice, there are several flexible education options to consider. For example, online fnp programs allow registered nurses to become Family Nurse Practitioners, where understanding genetics is increasingly valuable in patient care.

Those looking for cost-effective routes can explore the most affordable nursing programs, many of which include coursework in genetics and genomics. Additionally, the best online bsn to dnp programs offer advanced practice pathways for nurses seeking leadership roles in genetics-related research and patient care.

Even at the undergraduate level, the cheapest online rn to bsn programs help licensed nurses deepen their scientific understanding and skills. No matter your chosen path, a background in genetics paired with a nursing degree opens diverse and rewarding career opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Peter N. Ray

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles