World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
94
Citations
32258
World Ranking
10494
National Ranking
5402

John C. Hobbins publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John C. Hobbins sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 551 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

John C. Hobbins D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John C. Hobbins sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 94 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

John C. Hobbins is affiliated with the University of Colorado Denver in the United States. Their primary field of study is Medicine, with a strong focus on Obstetrics and Gynecology as well as Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health. Additional areas of research include Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Epidemiology, and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

Their work covers various topics within these fields, emphasizing pregnancy-related conditions and neonatal health. Key research topics include:

  • Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Birth, Development, and Health
  • Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
  • Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
  • Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Cardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy

John C. Hobbins has contributed to several recent publications. Notable papers include:

  • The diagnosis and management of suspected fetal growth restriction: an evidence-based approach, 2022, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • The role of the fetal biophysical profile in the management of fetal growth restriction, 2022, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Patterns of Brain Sparing in a Fetal Growth Restriction Cohort, 2022, Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • Altered Cord Blood Lipid Concentrations Correlate with Birth Weight and Doppler Velocimetry of Fetal Vessels in Human Fetal Growth Restriction Pregnancies, 2022, Cells
  • Doppler velocimetry discordance between paired umbilical artery vessels and clinical implications in fetal growth restriction, 2022, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

The predominant venues for their publications reflect a focus on obstetric and fetal medicine research, with frequent appearances in the following journals:

  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine
  • Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • Cells
  • American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology

John C. Hobbins collaborates regularly with several researchers in related fields. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Henry L. Galan
  • Greggory R. DeVore
  • Camille Driver
  • Manesha Putra
  • Diane L. Gumina

Best Publications

  • Infection and labor. V. Prevalence, microbiology, and clinical significance of intraamniotic infection in women with preterm labor and intact membranes

    R Romero;M Sirtori;E Oyarzun;C Avila

  • An evaluation of two equations for predicting fetal weight by ultrasound.

    Mary Jo Shepard;Virginia A. Richards;Richard L. Berkowitz;Steven L. Warsof

  • First-trimester maternal serum PAPP-A and free-beta subunit human chorionic gonadotropin concentrations and nuchal translucency are associated with obstetric complications: A population-based screening study (The FASTER Trial)

    Lorraine Dugoff;John C. Hobbins;Fergal D. Malone;T. Flint Porter

  • Infection and labor. III. Interleukin‐1: A signal for the onset of parturition

    R Romero;DT Brody;E Oyarzun;M Mazor

  • Infection in the pathogenesis of preterm labor

    Romero R;Mazor M;Mazor M;Wu Yk;Wu Yk;Sirtori M;Sirtori M

  • Meta-analysis of the relationship between asymptomatic bacteriuria and preterm delivery/low birth weight.

    Romero R;Oyarzun E;Mazor M;Sirtori M

  • The Safety and Efficacy of Chorionic Villus Sampling for Early Prenatal Diagnosis of Cytogenetic Abnormalities

    Rhoads Gg;Jackson Lg;Schlesselman Se;de la Cruz Ff

  • The diagnosis of fetal microcephaly.

    Frank F.A. Chervenak;Frank F.A. Chervenak;Frank F.A. Chervenak;Philippe Jeanty;Philippe Jeanty;Philippe Jeanty;Francis Cantraine;Francis Cantraine;Francis Cantraine;Usha U. Chitkara;Usha U. Chitkara;Usha U. Chitkara

  • Infection and labor. IV. Cachectin-tumor necrosis factor in the amniotic fluid of women with intraamniotic infection and preterm labor.

    Roberto Romero;Kirk R. Manogue;Murray D. Mitchell;Ying King Wu

  • Intraamniotic infection and the onset of labor in preterm premature rupture of the membranes.

    Roberto Romero;Ruben Quintero;Enrique Oyarzun;Ying King Wu

  • Fetal cystic hygroma. Cause and natural history.

    F A Chervenak;G Isaacson;K J Blakemore;W R Breg

  • The ultrasonic changes in the maturing placenta and their relation to fetal pulmonic maturity.

    Peter A.T. Grannum;Richard L. Berkowitz;John C. Hobbins

  • The estimation of fetal weight by computer-assisted analysis

    Steven L. Warsof;Steven L. Warsof;Parviz Gohari;Parviz Gohari;Richard L. Berkowitz;Richard L. Berkowitz;John C. Hobbins;John C. Hobbins

  • The prevalence and biologic significance of lupus anticoagulant and anticardiolipin antibodies in a general obstetric population.

    C.J. Lockwood;R. Romero;R.F. Feinberg;L.P. Clyne

  • Pregnancy and Its Outcome in Women with and without Surgical Treatment of Congenital Heart Disease

    Ruth Whittemore;John C. Hobbins;Mary Allen Engle

  • Fetal echocardiographic screening for congenital heart disease: the importance of the four-chamber view

    Joshua A. Copel;Gianluigi Pilu;Jacqueline Green;John C. Hobbins

  • Ultrasound in the diagnosis of congenital anomalies

    John C. Hobbins;Peter A.T. Grannum;Richard L. Berkowitz;Rosamund Silverman

  • Interleukin-1 stimulates prostaglandin biosynthesis by human amnion.

    R. Romero;S. Durum;C.A. Dinarello;E. Oyarzun

  • A new method to assess fetal head descent in labor with transperineal ultrasound.

    A. F. Barbera;X. Pombar;G. Perugino;D. C. Lezotte

  • Echocardiographic Studies of the Human Fetus: Prenatal Diagnosis of Congenital Heart Disease and Cardiac Dysrhythmias

    Charles S. Kleinman;John C. Hobbins;C. Carl Jaffe;Diana C. Lynch

Frequent Co-Authors

Roberto Romero
Roberto Romero National Institutes of Health
Murray D. Mitchell
Murray D. Mitchell Queensland University of Technology
Charles J. Lockwood
Charles J. Lockwood University of South Florida
Richard L. Berkowitz
Richard L. Berkowitz Columbia University
Mary E. D'Alton
Mary E. D'Alton Columbia University
George R. Saade
George R. Saade The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
David A. Nyberg
David A. Nyberg University of Washington
Moshe Mazor
Moshe Mazor Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Frederick Naftolin
Frederick Naftolin New York University
Lawrence D. Platt
Lawrence D. Platt University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine in the USA opens doors to a wide range of healthcare professions. Many students now opt for online degrees to fit their education around busy schedules and existing careers. For registered nurses (RNs) looking to advance, online rn-bsn programs without clinicals offer the flexibility to earn a bachelor’s degree while working, often with fewer hands-on requirements.

Those already holding an associate nursing degree can consider asn to nurse practitioner programs, which provide an accelerated path from RN to advanced practice roles through online bridge programs. Similarly, students interested in healthcare leadership might explore cahme accredited online mha programs, ensuring quality management education for future hospital administrators or healthcare policy experts.

For those drawn to preventative medicine and wellness, an online degree in nutrition opens doors to roles in dietetics, wellness coaching, and public health. These online pathways offer flexibility and accessibility, making it easier than ever to start or advance your career in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing John C. Hobbins

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles