World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
89
Citations
25303
World Ranking
12813
National Ranking
6548

Roy A. Filly publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roy A. Filly sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 419 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Roy A. Filly D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roy A. Filly sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Roy A. Filly is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Medicine and Surgery, with particular attention to congenital conditions and fetal surgery.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies
  • Congenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery
  • Esophageal and Gastrointestinal Pathology

Roy A. Filly has contributed to specific areas within these topics through their scholarly publications. One recent paper authored by Nimrah Abbasi with which they are associated is titled "Interrater agreement for sonographic stomach position classification in fetal diaphragmatic hernia across the North American Fetal Therapy Network," published in 2021 in the journal Prenatal Diagnosis. This work has been cited 7 times.

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers, including:

  • Nimrah Abbasi
  • Greg Ryan
  • Rodrigo Ruano
  • Magdalena Sanz Cortés
  • Xiang Y. Ye

Their publications mainly appear in the journal Prenatal Diagnosis, which is the primary venue associated with their work.

Best Publications

  • Sonographic predictors of survival in fetal diaphragmatic hernia.

    Andrea P Metkus;Roy A Filly;Mark D Stringer;Michael R Harrison

  • A randomized trial of fetal endoscopic tracheal occlusion for severe fetal congenital diaphragmatic hernia.

    Michael R Harrison;Roberta L Keller;Samuel B Hawgood;Joseph A Kitterman

  • Correction of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in utero: VI. hard-earned lessons

    Michael R. Harrison;N. Scott Adzick;Alan W. Flake;Russell W. Jennings

  • Fetal cystic adenomatoid malformation: Prenatal diagnosis and natural history

    N. Scott Adzick;Michael R. Harrison;Philip L. Glick;Mitchell S. Golbus

  • Exclusion of fetal ventriculomegaly with a single measurement: the width of the lateral ventricular atrium.

    J D Cardoza;R B Goldstein;R A Filly

  • Correction of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in utero IX: fetuses with poor prognosis (liver herniation and low lung-to-head ratio) can be saved by fetoscopic temporary tracheal occlusion.

    Michael R Harrison;George B Mychaliska;Craig T Albanese;Russell W Jennings

  • Successful Repair in Utero of a Fetal Diaphragmatic Hernia after Removal of Herniated Viscera from the Left Thorax

    Harrison Mr;Adzick Ns;Longaker Mt;Goldberg Jd

  • Correction of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in utero, V. Initial clinical experience.

    Michael R. Harrison;Jacob C. Langer;N. Scott Adzick;Mitchell S. Golbus

  • CORRECTION OF CONGENITAL DIAPHRAGMATIC HERNIA IN UTERO VIII : RESPONSE OF THE HYPOPLASTIC LUNG TO TRACHEAL OCCLUSION

    Michael R. Harrison;N. Scott Adzick;Alan W. Flake;Karen J. VanderWall

  • Fetal liver position and perinatal outcome for congenital diaphragmatic hernia

    Craig T. Albanese;John Lopoo;Ruth B. Goldstein;Roy A. Filly

  • Endometriomas: Diagnostic Performance of US

    Maitray D. Patel;Vickie A. Feldstein;Dillon C. Chen;Scott D. Lipson

  • Correction of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in utero VII: A prospective trial

    Michael R Harrison;N.Scott Adzick;Kelli M Bullard;Jody A Farrell

  • Management of the fetus with congenital hydronephrosis II: Prognostic criteria and selection for treatment

    Philip L. Glick;Michael R. Harrison;Mitchell S. Golbus;N. Scott Adzick

  • Fast MR Imaging of Fetal CNS Anomalies in Utero

    E M Simon;R B Goldstein;F V Coakley;R A Filly

  • Fetal Treatment 1982

    Harrison Mr;Filly Ra;Golbus Ms;Berkowitz Rl

  • Fetal MRI: A Developing Technique for the Developing Patient

    Fergus V. Coakley;Orit A. Glenn;Aliya Qayyum;Anthony J. Barkovich

  • Management of the fetus with congenital hydronephrosis

    Michael R. Harrison;Mitchell S. Golbus;Roy A. Filly;Don K. Nakayama

  • Fetal intervention in obstructive uropathy: prognostic indicators and efficacy of intervention.

    Timothy M. Crombleholme;Michael R. Harrison;Mitchell S. Golbus;Michael T. Longaker

  • US Characterization of Ovarian Masses: A Meta-Analysis

    Karen Kinkel;Hedvig Hricak;Ying Lu;Kyo Tsuda

  • Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: Prenatal evaluation with MR lung volumetry - Preliminary experience

    Bettina W. Paek;Fergus V. Coakley;Ying Lu;Roy A. Filly

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael R. Harrison
Michael R. Harrison Duke University
Mark A. Rosen
Mark A. Rosen University of Pennsylvania
N. Scott Adzick
N. Scott Adzick Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Hedvig Hricak
Hedvig Hricak Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
David A. Nyberg
David A. Nyberg University of Washington
Alan W. Flake
Alan W. Flake Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Michael T. Longaker
Michael T. Longaker Stanford University
Deborah Levine
Deborah Levine University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
A. James Barkovich
A. James Barkovich University of California, San Francisco
Michael S. B. Edwards
Michael S. B. Edwards Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Medicine doesn’t always mean a traditional path. Many students are now considering flexible, online options that lead to rewarding roles in healthcare administration, nursing, and advanced practice.

For those interested in leadership, the top cahme-accredited mha programs offer fully accredited online Master of Health Administration degrees—a great option for managing hospitals and healthcare systems.

Already an RN? You might want a program that fits a busy schedule. Some rn to bsn programs without clinicals allow you to earn your bachelor’s faster and with more convenience, without additional hands-on requirements.

Nurses looking to advance can pursue the fastest dnp program to quickly earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice online. If writing a lengthy paper isn’t for you, consider online dnp programs without dissertation.

These alternative pathways make it easier to balance work, life, and study while still progressing in a competitive healthcare field.

Best Scientists Citing Roy A. Filly

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles