World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Mark A. Rosen publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark A. Rosen sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Mark A. Rosen D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark A. Rosen sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark A. Rosen is affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania in the United States. Their research predominantly falls within the field of Medicine, with a focus on subfields such as Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery, Genetics, Oncology, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

Their research topics cover a range of specialized areas including:

  • MRI in cancer diagnosis
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Head and Neck Surgical Oncology
  • Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Anesthesia and Pain Management

Mark A. Rosen has published extensively in several journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B Skull Base
  • Radiology
  • Clinical Cancer Research
  • BMC Palliative Care
  • Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Rosen include:

  • The QIBA Profile for Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast MRI Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers for Assessing Gliomas, 2024, Radiology
  • Multimetric MRI Captures Early Response and Acquired Resistance of Pancreatic Cancer to KRAS Inhibitor Therapy, 2025, Clinical Cancer Research
  • The Support Needs Approach for Patients (SNAP): content validity and response processes from the perspective of patients and nurses in Swedish specialised palliative home care, 2025, BMC Palliative Care
  • Cauterization of the Sphenoid Rostrum during SPA Ligation: Does This Technique Decrease Number of Subsequent Rebleeds?, 2021, Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B Skull Base
  • Odontogenic Sinusitis: Predictors and Outcomes in Unilateral Maxillary Sinusitis, 2021, Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B Skull Base

They frequently collaborate with several co-authors, including Theodore Klug, Glen E. D. Souza, Tory McKnight, Chandala Chitguppi, and Blair M. Barton.

Best Publications

  • Fetal pain: a systematic multidisciplinary review of the evidence.

    Susan J. Lee;Henry J. Peter Ralston;Eleanor A. Drey;John Colin Partridge

  • Correction of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in utero: VI. hard-earned lessons

    Michael R. Harrison;N. Scott Adzick;Alan W. Flake;Russell W. Jennings

  • Three-dimensional in vivo fluorescence diffuse optical tomography of breast cancer in humans.

    Alper Corlu;Regine Choe;Turgut Durduran;Mark A. Rosen

  • Locally Advanced Breast Cancer: MR Imaging for Prediction of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy—Results from ACRIN 6657/I-SPY TRIAL

    Nola M. Hylton;Jeffrey D. Blume;Wanda K. Bernreuter;Etta D. Pisano

  • Operating on placental support: The ex utero intrapartum treatment procedure

    George B Mychaliska;John F Bealer;Joy L Graf;Mark A Rosen

  • Intravenous Remifentanil: Placental Transfer, Maternal and Neonatal Effects

    Randall E. Kan;Samuel C. Hughes;Mark A. Rosen;Charlize Kessin

  • Diffuse optical tomography of breast cancer during neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a case study with comparison to MRI.

    Regine Choe;Alper Corlu;Kijoon Lee;Turgut Durduran

  • Fetal surgery for congenital hydronephrosis.

    M R Harrison;Golbus;R A Filly;P W Callen

  • CDK 4/6 Inhibitor Palbociclib (PD0332991) in Rb+ Advanced Breast Cancer: Phase II Activity, Safety and Predictive Biomarker Assessment

    Angela DeMichele;Amy S. Clark;Kay See Tan;Daniel F. Heitjan

  • Targeting HER-2/neu in early breast cancer development using dendritic cells with staged interleukin-12 burst secretion.

    Brian J. Czerniecki;Gary K. Koski;Gary K. Koski;Ursula Koldovsky;Shuwen Xu

  • Successful Repair in Utero of a Fetal Diaphragmatic Hernia after Removal of Herniated Viscera from the Left Thorax

    Harrison Mr;Adzick Ns;Longaker Mt;Goldberg Jd

  • Phase I Trial of the Antivascular Agent Combretastatin A4 Phosphate on a 5-Day Schedule to Patients With Cancer: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evidence for Altered Tumor Blood Flow

    James P. Stevenson;Mark Rosen;Weijing Sun;Maryann Gallagher

  • Correction of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in utero, V. Initial clinical experience.

    Michael R. Harrison;Jacob C. Langer;N. Scott Adzick;Mitchell S. Golbus

  • Nitrous oxide for relief of labor pain: A systematic review ☆

    Mark A. Rosen

  • CORRECTION OF CONGENITAL DIAPHRAGMATIC HERNIA IN UTERO VIII : RESPONSE OF THE HYPOPLASTIC LUNG TO TRACHEAL OCCLUSION

    Michael R. Harrison;N. Scott Adzick;Alan W. Flake;Karen J. VanderWall

  • Correction of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in utero VII: A prospective trial

    Michael R Harrison;N.Scott Adzick;Kelli M Bullard;Jody A Farrell

  • Quantitative imaging biomarkers alliance (QIBA) recommendations for improved precision of DWI and DCE‐MRI derived biomarkers in multicenter oncology trials

    Amita Shukla-Dave;Nancy A. Obuchowski;Thomas L. Chenevert;Sachin Jambawalikar

  • Differentiation of benign and malignant breast tumors by in-vivo three-dimensional parallel-plate diffuse optical tomography

    Regine Choe;Soren D. Konecky;Alper Corlu;Kijoon Lee

  • Imaging of hepatic steatosis.

    Evan S. Siegelman;Mark A. Rosen

  • Prostate Cancer: Sextant Localization at MR Imaging and MR Spectroscopic Imaging before Prostatectomy—Results of ACRIN Prospective Multi-institutional Clinicopathologic Study

    Jeffrey C. Weinreb;Jeffrey D. Blume;Fergus V. Coakley;Thomas M. Wheeler

Frequent Co-Authors

Mitchell D. Schnall
Mitchell D. Schnall University of Pennsylvania
Anant Madabhushi
Anant Madabhushi Emory University
Michael Feldman
Michael Feldman University of Pennsylvania
Angela DeMichele
Angela DeMichele University of Pennsylvania
Arjun G. Yodh
Arjun G. Yodh University of Pennsylvania
Peter J. O'Dwyer
Peter J. O'Dwyer University of Pennsylvania
Michael R. Harrison
Michael R. Harrison Duke University
Roy A. Filly
Roy A. Filly University of California, San Francisco
Laura J. Esserman
Laura J. Esserman University of California, San Francisco
Constance D. Lehman
Constance D. Lehman Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering medicine in the USA opens many online pathways in healthcare and administration. If you're seeking a quicker route to enter the nursing field, fast lpn program options offer a streamlined way to become a Licensed Practical Nurse and start gaining experience sooner.

For those interested in mental health, online psych np programs enable registered nurses to specialize further and advance into psychiatric nurse practitioner roles. These programs are designed with flexibility for working professionals.

Not everyone who wants to build a healthcare career needs to work in clinical settings. If you’re more interested in leadership and management, a health care administration degree online can open doors to hospital or clinic administration roles.

For graduate-level advancement, affordable online mha programs offer a convenient way to earn a Master of Healthcare Administration—ideal for those aspiring to executive healthcare positions.

Each of these degree options supports versatile career pathways in today’s evolving healthcare landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Mark A. Rosen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles