World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 97 9153 8594 4722 4369 363 41792

Mitchell D. Schnall publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mitchell D. Schnall between 1985 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mitchell D. Schnall published across 41 years, from 1985 to 2025, averaging 9.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 1997. 8 of the 390 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 1997. 1985: 1 publication 1986: 3 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 10 publications 1993: 11 publications 1994: 15 publications 1995: 12 publications 1996: 9 publications 1997: 18 publications 1998: 16 publications 1999: 18 publications 2000: 16 publications 2001: 16 publications 2002: 12 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 13 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 16 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 18 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 3 publications
1985 2025

390 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mitchell D. Schnall: publications per year, 1985 to 2025
Year Publications
1985 1
1986 3
1987 3
1988 2
1989 3
1990 3
1991 4
1992 10
1993 11
1994 15
1995 12
1996 9
1997 18
1998 16
1999 18
2000 16
2001 16
2002 12
2003 10
2004 13
2005 11
2006 16
2007 13
2008 15
2009 6
2010 9
2011 2
2012 6
2013 5
2014 12
2015 10
2016 15
2017 9
2018 6
2019 11
2020 11
2021 8
2022 4
2023 18
2024 5
2025 3
Total 390
Download as CSV

Mitchell D. Schnall publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mitchell D. Schnall sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 361–380 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 363 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838 363
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Mitchell D. Schnall D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mitchell D. Schnall sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 96–97 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 97 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779 97
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2012 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians

Overview

Mitchell D. Schnall is affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of Medicine, with a focus on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology, Cancer Research, and Biomedical Engineering.

Their main topics of research include:

  • Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
  • MRI in cancer diagnosis
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Radiology practices and education
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
  • Radiation Dose and Imaging

Mitchell D. Schnall has authored numerous research papers. Some of the recent publications include:

  • Comparison of Abbreviated Breast MRI vs Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women With Dense Breasts Undergoing Screening (2020, JAMA)
  • Five Consecutive Years of Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Outcomes by Screening Year and Round (2020, Radiology)
  • 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy of 2H-to-1H exchange quantifies the dynamics of cellular metabolism in vivo (2020, Nature Biomedical Engineering)
  • Abbreviated Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Supplemental Screening of Women With Dense Breasts and Average Risk (2020, Journal of Clinical Oncology)
  • First-generation clinical dual-source photon-counting CT: ultra-low-dose quantitative spectral imaging (2022, European Radiology)

Their frequent coauthors include:

  • Christopher Comstock
  • Constantine Gatsonis
  • Harold Litt
  • Ilana F. Gareen
  • Arijitt Borthakur

Mitchell D. Schnall has published repeatedly in prominent venues such as:

  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of the American College of Radiology
  • Radiology
  • UNC Libraries

The scientist is recognized for membership in professional organizations, including:

  • Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) since 2012
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians

Best Publications

  • American Cancer Society Guidelines for Breast Screening with MRI as an Adjunct to Mammography

    Debbie Saslow;Carla Boetes;Wylie Burke;Steven Harms

  • PI-RADS Prostate Imaging - Reporting and Data System: 2015, Version 2

    Jeffrey C. Weinreb;Jelle O. Barentsz;Peter L. Choyke;Francois Cornud

  • The national lung screening trial: Overview and study design

    Constantine A. Gatsonis;Denise R. Aberle;Christine D. Berg;William C. Black

  • MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer

    Constance D. Lehman;Constantine Gatsonis;Christiane K. Kuhl;R. Edward Hendrick

  • Concurrent MRI and diffuse optical tomography of breast after indocyanine green enhancement

    Vasilis Ntziachristos;A. G. Yodh;Mitchell Schnall;Britton Chance

  • MR Imaging of the Breast for the Detection, Diagnosis, and Staging of Breast Cancer

    Susan G. Orel;Mitchell D. Schnall

  • Experimental allergic encephalomyelitis and multiple sclerosis: lesion characterization with magnetization transfer imaging.

    Vincent Dousset;Robert I. Grossman;Karen N. Ramer;Mitchell D. Schnall

  • Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: Multicenter study

    Mitchell D. Schnall;Jeffrey Blume;David A. Bluemke;Gia A. DeAngelis

  • Suspicious breast lesions : MR imaging with radiologic-pathologic correlation

    S G Orel;M D Schnall;V A LiVolsi;R H Troupin

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Breast Prior to Biopsy

    David A. Bluemke;Constantine A. Gatsonis;Mei Hsiu Chen;Gia A. DeAngelis

  • Quantitative Analysis of Dynamic Gd‐DTPA Enhancement in Breast Tumors Using a Permeability Model

    Paul S. Tofts;Bruce Berkowitz;Mitchell D. Schnall

  • Staging of suspected breast cancer: effect of MR imaging and MR-guided biopsy.

    S G Orel;M D Schnall;C M Powell;M G Hochman

  • Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging.

    Constance D. Lehman;Jeffrey D. Blume;Paul Weatherall;David Thickman

  • Three-dimensional in vivo fluorescence diffuse optical tomography of breast cancer in humans.

    Alper Corlu;Regine Choe;Turgut Durduran;Mark A. Rosen

  • Locally Advanced Breast Cancer: MR Imaging for Prediction of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy—Results from ACRIN 6657/I-SPY TRIAL

    Nola M. Hylton;Jeffrey D. Blume;Wanda K. Bernreuter;Etta D. Pisano

  • Cancer yield of mammography, MR, and US in high-risk women: prospective multi-institution breast cancer screening study.

    Constance D. Lehman;Claudine Isaacs;Mitchell D. Schnall;Etta D. Pisano

  • Comparison of quantitative perfusion imaging using arterial spin labeling at 1.5 and 4.0 Tesla.

    Jiongjiong Wang;David C. Alsop;Lin Li;John Listerud

  • Relationship of Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Outcome After Breast-Conservation Treatment With Radiation for Women With Early-Stage Invasive Breast Carcinoma or Ductal Carcinoma in Situ

    Lawrence J. Solin;Susan G. Orel;Wei-Ting Hwang;Eleanor E. Harris

  • Changes in the surgical management of patients with breast carcinoma based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging.

    Isabelle Bedrosian;Rosemarie Mick;Susan G. Orel;Mitchell Schnall M.D.

  • Diagnostic Architectural and Dynamic Features at Breast MR

    Mitchell D. Schnall;Jeffrey Blume;David A. Bluemke;Gia A. DeAngelis

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark A. Rosen
Mark A. Rosen University of Pennsylvania
Constance D. Lehman
Constance D. Lehman Harvard University
Arjun G. Yodh
Arjun G. Yodh University of Pennsylvania
Constantine Gatsonis
Constantine Gatsonis Brown University
Robert E. Lenkinski
Robert E. Lenkinski The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Herbert Y. Kressel
Herbert Y. Kressel Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
John E. Tomaszewski
John E. Tomaszewski University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Christiane K. Kuhl
Christiane K. Kuhl RWTH Aachen University
Britton Chance
Britton Chance University of Pennsylvania
Lawrence J. Solin
Lawrence J. Solin University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens doors to various online degrees and career paths in healthcare. Many students consider starting their journey with financial aid for medical billing and coding online classes, which offer flexible study options and essential skills for working behind the scenes in healthcare administration.

For those interested in nursing, understanding admission requirements is key. Some top schools offer programs where do you have to take the teas test to get into nursing school is no longer a barrier, making entry easier for prospective students.

If you aspire to leadership roles in a medical setting, a healthcare administration degree can provide you with management expertise and open up advanced career opportunities across the healthcare sector.

Registered nurses looking to advance further can benefit from specialized bridge pathways. For example, adn to np bridge programs allow RNs to progress directly to a Nurse Practitioner role, accelerating both clinical skills and earning potential.

Best Scientists Citing Mitchell D. Schnall

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles