World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
85
Citations
21486
World Ranking
14776
National Ranking
7467

D. David Dershaw publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where D. David Dershaw sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 192 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

D. David Dershaw D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where D. David Dershaw sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

D. David Dershaw is affiliated with the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in the United States. Their primary area of research and publication falls within the field of Medicine, with a specialization in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine, and Imaging. The scientist's work focuses on topics related to radiology practices and education.

The publication record includes a paper titled Mary C. Mahoney, MD, President, Radiological Society of North America, 2021, published in 2021 in the journal Radiology. This publication contributes to the ongoing discourse in radiology within a notable professional society context.

D. David Dershaw's frequent publication venue is:

  • Radiology

The main field of study for this researcher is:

  • Medicine

The subfield of study identified is:

  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

The primary topics covered in their work focus on:

  • Radiology practices and education

Best Publications

  • Breast Cancer Screening With Imaging: Recommendations From the Society of Breast Imaging and the ACR on the Use of Mammography, Breast MRI, Breast Ultrasound, and Other Technologies for the Detection of Clinically Occult Breast Cancer

    Carol H. Lee;D. David Dershaw;Daniel Kopans;Phil Evans

  • The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories.

    L Liberman;A F Abramson;F B Squires;J R Glassman

  • US-guided core breast biopsy: use and cost-effectiveness.

    L Liberman;T L Feng;D D Dershaw;E A Morris

  • MR Imaging of the Ipsilateral Breast in Women with Percutaneously Proven Breast Cancer

    Laura Liberman;Elizabeth A. Morris;D. David Dershaw;Andrea F. Abramson

  • Bilateral contrast-enhanced dual-energy digital mammography: feasibility and comparison with conventional digital mammography and MR imaging in women with known breast carcinoma.

    Maxine S Jochelson;D David Dershaw;Janice S Sung;Alexandra S Heerdt

  • MRI of occult breast carcinoma in a high-risk population.

    Elizabeth A. Morris;Laura Liberman;Douglas J. Ballon;Mark Robson

  • Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at stereotaxic core biopsy of breast lesions: an indication for surgical biopsy.

    L Liberman;M A Cohen;D D Dershaw;A F Abramson

  • Breast lesions detected on MR imaging: features and positive predictive value.

    Laura Liberman;Elizabeth A Morris;Melissa Joo-Young Lee;Jennifer B Kaplan

  • Standard for Breast Conservation Therapy in the Management of Invasive Breast Carcinoma

    Monica Morrow;Eric A. Strom;Lawrence W. Bassett;D. David Dershaw

  • MR Imaging Findings in the Contralateral Breast of Women with Recently Diagnosed Breast Cancer

    Laura Liberman;Elizabeth A. Morris;Cathleen M. Kim;Jennifer B. Kaplan

  • Stereotaxic 14-gauge breast biopsy: how many core biopsy specimens are needed?

    L Liberman;D D Dershaw;P P Rosen;A F Abramson

  • Calcification retrieval at stereotactic, 11-gauge, directional, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy.

    L Liberman;J H Smolkin;D D Dershaw;E A Morris

  • Breast Lesions Detected with MR Imaging: Utility and Histopathologic Importance of Identification with US

    Linda R. LaTrenta;Jennifer H. Menell;Elizabeth A. Morris;Andrea F. Abramson

  • Breast cancer in patients irradiated for Hodgkin's disease: a clinical and pathologic analysis of 45 events in 37 patients.

    J Yahalom;J A Petrek;P W Biddinger;S Kessler

  • Proton MR spectroscopy with choline peak as malignancy marker improves positive predictive value for breast cancer diagnosis: preliminary study.

    Lia Bartella;Elizabeth A. Morris;D. David Dershaw;Laura Liberman

  • MRI-Guided 9-Gauge Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy: Initial Clinical Experience

    Laura Liberman;Nanette Bracero;Elizabeth Morris;Cynthia Thornton

  • Neoadjuvant M-VAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin) effect on the primary bladder lesion.

    Howard I. Scher;Alan Yagoda;Harry W. Herr;Cora N. Sternberg

  • Estramustine and vinblastine: use of prostate specific antigen as a clinical trial end point for hormone refractory prostatic cancer.

    Andrew D. Seidman;Howard I. Scher;Daniel Petrylak;D. David Dershaw

  • MR imaging of the breast in patients with occult primary breast carcinoma.

    E A Morris;L H Schwartz;D D Dershaw;K J van Zee

  • Percutaneous core biopsy of the breast: effect of operator experience and number of samples on diagnostic accuracy

    R J Brenner;L Fajardo;P R Fisher;D D Dershaw

Frequent Co-Authors

Elizabeth A. Morris
Elizabeth A. Morris Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Laura Liberman
Laura Liberman Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Paul Peter Rosen
Paul Peter Rosen Cornell University
Howard I. Scher
Howard I. Scher Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Kimberly J. Van Zee
Kimberly J. Van Zee Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Cora N. Sternberg
Cora N. Sternberg Cornell University
David P. Winchester
David P. Winchester American College of Surgeons
George J. Bosl
George J. Bosl Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Monica Morrow
Monica Morrow Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Patrick I. Borgen
Patrick I. Borgen Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative healthcare degrees is a practical way to enter the medical field or enhance your existing career in medicine. Online options offer flexibility and affordability, making them ideal for busy students or working professionals.

If you’re interested in the intersection of healthcare and technology, healthcare informatics degree programs provide training in data management and information systems. These skills are increasingly in demand as digital records become standard in medical facilities.

For those seeking administrative roles, obtaining a certification in medical billing and coding is a smart move. Understanding the medical coding certification cost can help you find programs that fit your budget without sacrificing quality.

Nursing remains one of the most rewarding and stable health careers. There are most affordable online nurse practitioner programs for graduates looking to advance their scope of practice, as well as cheapest bsn programs online for aspiring RNs seeking cost-effective routes to a bachelor’s degree in nursing.

By considering these related online degrees and pathways, you can find the right fit for your goals and budget while preparing for a successful healthcare career in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing D. David Dershaw

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles