World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Best Female Scientists
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Best Female Scientists 118 603 574 366 345 888 64042
Medicine 120 3689 3452 2031 1878 880 68274

Monica Morrow publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Monica Morrow between 1981 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Monica Morrow published across 45 years, from 1981 to 2025, averaging 19.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 63 publications in 2017. 12 of the 871 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 63. Peak 63 publications in 2017. 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 2 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 3 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 9 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 15 publications 1999: 19 publications 2000: 15 publications 2001: 14 publications 2002: 26 publications 2003: 18 publications 2004: 19 publications 2005: 19 publications 2006: 38 publications 2007: 38 publications 2008: 16 publications 2009: 36 publications 2010: 45 publications 2011: 30 publications 2012: 28 publications 2013: 41 publications 2014: 35 publications 2015: 41 publications 2016: 44 publications 2017: 63 publications 2018: 35 publications 2019: 39 publications 2020: 40 publications 2021: 59 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 29 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 7 publications
1981 2025

871 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Monica Morrow: publications per year, 1981 to 2025
Year Publications
1981 1
1982 0
1983 0
1984 3
1985 0
1986 1
1987 1
1988 2
1989 1
1990 1
1991 1
1992 1
1993 3
1994 7
1995 9
1996 8
1997 6
1998 15
1999 19
2000 15
2001 14
2002 26
2003 18
2004 19
2005 19
2006 38
2007 38
2008 16
2009 36
2010 45
2011 30
2012 28
2013 41
2014 35
2015 41
2016 44
2017 63
2018 35
2019 39
2020 40
2021 59
2022 12
2023 29
2024 5
2025 7
Total 871
Download as CSV

Monica Morrow publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Monica Morrow sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 861–880 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 880 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155 880
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Monica Morrow D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Monica Morrow sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 120–121 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 120 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287 120
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Best Female Scientists Award

Overview

Monica Morrow is affiliated with Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in the United States, focusing primarily on medical research related to breast cancer. Their work spans various aspects of oncology, surgery, and cancer research, with a notable concentration on breast cancer treatment and related fields.

Their research covers a diverse array of subjects including breast cancer treatment studies, breast implant and reconstruction, breast lesions and carcinomas, BRCA gene mutations in cancer, reconstructive surgery and microvascular techniques, HER2/EGFR in cancer research, and cancer treatment and pharmacology.

The main fields of study for this scientist include Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology. Subfields prominently represented in their publications are Cancer Research, Surgery, Oncology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, and Genetics.

Monica Morrow has contributed extensively to academic journals, with frequent publications in:

  • Annals of Surgical Oncology
  • Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
  • British journal of surgery
  • International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
  • Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery

Their recent scientific papers include:

  • Survival Outcomes for Metaplastic Breast Cancer Differ by Histologic Subtype, 2021, Annals of Surgical Oncology
  • The Effect of Age on Outcomes After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer, 2022, Annals of Surgical Oncology
  • Robotic mastectomy: the next major advance in breast cancer surgery?, 2021, British journal of surgery
  • 10-Year Breast Cancer Outcomes in Women ≤35 Years of Age, 2020, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
  • Atypical ductal hyperplasia bordering on DCIS on core biopsy is associated with higher risk of upgrade than conventional atypical ductal hyperplasia, 2020, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

Collaborations are a significant component of their work, with frequent coauthors including Audree B. Tadros, Varadan Sevilimedu, Anita Mamtani, Kate R. Pawloski, and Jonas A. Nelson.

Best Publications

  • Personalizing the treatment of women with early breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2013

    A Goldhirsch;E P Winer;A S Coates;R D Gelber

  • Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: A randomized clinical trial

    Armando E. Giuliano;Kelly K. Hunt;Karla V. Ballman;Peter D. Beitsch

  • The Effect of Raloxifene on Risk of Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women: Results From the MORE Randomized Trial

    Steven R. Cummings;Stephen Eckert;Kathryn A. Krueger;Deborah Grady

  • Revision of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System for Breast Cancer

    S. Eva Singletary;Craig Allred;Pandora Ashley;Lawrence W. Bassett

  • Locoregional recurrence after sentinel lymph node dissection with or without axillary dissection in patients with sentinel lymph node metastases: the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 randomized trial.

    Armando E. Giuliano;Linda McCall;Peter Beitsch;Pat W. Whitworth

  • Effect of Axillary Dissection vs No Axillary Dissection on 10-Year Overall Survival Among Women With Invasive Breast Cancer and Sentinel Node Metastasis: The ACOSOG Z0011 (Alliance) Randomized Clinical Trial

    Armando E. Giuliano;Karla V. Ballman;Linda McCall;Peter D. Beitsch

  • Society of surgical oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages i and II invasive breast cancer

    Meena S. Moran;Stuart J. Schnitt;Armando E. Giuliano;Jay R. Harris

  • De-escalating and escalating treatments for early-stage breast cancer: the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus Conference on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2017

    G. Curigliano;H. J. Burstein;E. P. Winer;M. Gnant

  • Continued breast cancer risk reduction in postmenopausal women treated with raloxifene: 4-year results from the MORE trial.

    J. A. Cauley;L. Norton;M. E. Lippman;S. Eckert

  • Society of Surgical Oncology–American Society for Radiation Oncology–American Society of Clinical Oncology Consensus Guideline on Margins for Breast-Conserving Surgery with Whole-Breast Irradiation in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ

    Monica Morrow;Kimberly J. Van Zee;Lawrence J. Solin;Nehmat Houssami

  • ASCO/SSO Review of Current Role of Risk-Reducing Surgery in Common Hereditary Cancer Syndromes

    José G. Guillem;William C. Wood;Jeffrey F. Moley;Andrew Berchuck

  • Regulatory T Cells Exhibit Distinct Features in Human Breast Cancer.

    George Plitas;Catherine Konopacki;Kenmin Wu;Paula D. Bos

  • High-intensity sequencing reveals the sources of plasma circulating cell-free DNA variants.

    Pedram Razavi;Bob T. Li;David N. Brown;Byoungsok Jung

  • Customizing local and systemic therapies for women with early breast cancer: the St. Gallen International Consensus Guidelines for treatment of early breast cancer 2021.

    H J Burstein;G Curigliano;B Thürlimann;W P Weber

  • Locoregional Recurrence After Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection With or Without Axillary Dissection in Patients with Sentinel Lymph Node Metastases: Long-Term Follow-Up from the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (Alliance) ACOSOG Z0011 Randomized Trial

    Armando E. Giuliano;Karla Ballman;Linda McCall;Peter Beitsch

  • The association of surgical margins and local recurrence in women with early-stage invasive breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy: a meta-analysis.

    Nehmat Houssami;Petra Macaskill;M. Luke Marinovich;Monica Morrow

  • Inflammation and Increased Aromatase Expression Occur in the Breast Tissue of Obese Women with Breast Cancer

    Patrick G. Morris;Clifford A. Hudis;Dilip Giri;Monica Morrow

  • Factors Predicting the Use of Breast-Conserving Therapy in Stage I and II Breast Carcinoma

    Monica Morrow;Julia White;Jennifer Moughan;Jean Owen

  • MRI for breast cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment

    Monica Morrow;Janet Waters;Elizabeth Morris

  • Does aggressive local therapy improve survival in metastatic breast cancer

    Seema Ahsan Khan;Andrew K. Stewart;Monica Morrow

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven J. Katz
Steven J. Katz University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Reshma Jagsi
Reshma Jagsi University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Kimberly J. Van Zee
Kimberly J. Van Zee Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Edi Brogi
Edi Brogi Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Ann S. Hamilton
Ann S. Hamilton University of Southern California
Clifford A. Hudis
Clifford A. Hudis Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Larry Norton
Larry Norton Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Allison W. Kurian
Allison W. Kurian Stanford University
Simon N. Powell
Simon N. Powell Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Andrew J. Dannenberg
Andrew J. Dannenberg Cornell University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The journey to a medical career extends beyond traditional MD programs. Many students explore online degree options to build a flexible, rewarding path in healthcare. For instance, an online nutritionist degree enables students to specialize in dietetics and nutrition, meeting growing demands in preventative health and wellness.

For those pursuing leadership or administrative roles, it’s helpful to know whats the best online mha program for working adults. These programs are designed to fit busy schedules, letting professionals balance work and study while preparing for management positions in healthcare organizations.

Registered nurses interested in advancing their education often wonder, does rn to bsn require clinicals? Some accredited programs minimize or waive clinical requirements, making career progression more accessible for working nurses.

Students seeking advanced practice roles can consider the shortest dnp programs, which help nurses earn doctoral credentials efficiently online. These pathways broaden opportunities across clinical, leadership, and academic settings.

Exploring these alternative online degrees broadens your options and can lead to specialized, impactful careers in the healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Monica Morrow

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles