World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 114 4653 4365 2527 2341 560 60636

Armando E. Giuliano publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Armando E. Giuliano between 1977 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Armando E. Giuliano published across 50 years, from 1977 to 2026, averaging 12.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 33 publications in 2023. 19 of the 620 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1977 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 33. Peak 33 publications in 2023. 1977: 4 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 4 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 4 publications 1982: 6 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 7 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 10 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 17 publications 1999: 23 publications 2000: 17 publications 2001: 21 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 12 publications 2004: 14 publications 2005: 15 publications 2006: 19 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 24 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 26 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 18 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 22 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 28 publications 2018: 22 publications 2019: 19 publications 2020: 24 publications 2021: 24 publications 2022: 25 publications 2023: 33 publications 2024: 19 publications 2025: 18 publications 2026: 1 publication
1977 2026

620 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Armando E. Giuliano: publications per year, 1977 to 2026
Year Publications
1977 4
1978 0
1979 4
1980 2
1981 4
1982 6
1983 2
1984 3
1985 2
1986 1
1987 1
1988 7
1989 5
1990 4
1991 4
1992 3
1993 3
1994 3
1995 4
1996 10
1997 9
1998 17
1999 23
2000 17
2001 21
2002 11
2003 12
2004 14
2005 15
2006 19
2007 15
2008 24
2009 13
2010 26
2011 16
2012 18
2013 13
2014 22
2015 13
2016 17
2017 28
2018 22
2019 19
2020 24
2021 24
2022 25
2023 33
2024 19
2025 18
2026 1
Total 620
Download as CSV

Armando E. Giuliano publications per year - data summary

  • Armando E. Giuliano, a Medicine scholar from Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, has 620 publications recorded across 50 years, from 1977 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1977 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive year is 2023, with 33 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1986, 1987 and 2026, with 1 publication each.
  • 1 of the 50 years in the span carries no publications at all (1978).
  • The rate of publication averages 12.4 papers per year over the whole span, or 12.7 per year counting only the 49 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 96 publications, 15% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1977-1993: 55 publications (3.2 per year); 1994-2010: 253 publications (14.9 per year); 2011-2026: 312 publications (19.5 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Armando E. Giuliano publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Armando E. Giuliano sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 541–560 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 560 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537 560
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Armando E. Giuliano publication distribution in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 101–120 to 1,796+ publications.
  • Armando E. Giuliano, a Medicine scholar from Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, records 560 publications - the 67th percentile of the discipline.
  • 67% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Armando E. Giuliano, and about 33% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 441–460 publications range, and Armando E. Giuliano ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 341–360 publications, holding 922 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 64% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 521–540 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Armando E. Giuliano D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Armando E. Giuliano sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 114–115 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 114 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393 114
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Armando E. Giuliano D-index placement in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 75 ranges running from 70–71 to 217+ D-Index.
  • Armando E. Giuliano, a Medicine scholar from Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, records 114 D-Index - the 77th percentile of the discipline.
  • 77% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Armando E. Giuliano, and about 23% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 94–95 D-Index range, and Armando E. Giuliano ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 82–83 D-Index, holding 1,027 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 106–107 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Armando E. Giuliano is affiliated with Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in the United States. Their research predominantly spans the fields of medicine, biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a particular focus on cancer research, oncology, and surgery. They have also contributed to subfields such as pathology and forensic medicine and molecular biology.

The scientist's work addresses several key topics, including breast cancer treatment studies, breast lesions and carcinomas, breast implant and reconstruction, HER2/EGFR in cancer research, cancer genomics and diagnostics, cancer immunotherapy and biomarkers, and cancer cells and metastasis.

Among their recent published papers are the following:

  • Effect of Axillary Dissection vs No Axillary Dissection on 10-Year Overall Survival Among Women With Invasive Breast Cancer and Sentinel Node Metastasis: The ACOSOG Z0011 (Alliance) Randomized Clinical Trial, 2020, UNC Libraries
  • Single-cell and spatial profiling identify three response trajectories to pembrolizumab and radiation therapy in triple negative breast cancer, 2024, Cancer Cell
  • Global Cancer Surgery: pragmatic solutions to improve cancer surgery outcomes worldwide, 2023, The Lancet Oncology
  • Pathologic and molecular responses to neoadjuvant trastuzumab and/or lapatinib from a phase II randomized trial in HER2-positive breast cancer (TRIO-US B07), 2020, Nature Communications
  • Local Recurrence After Breast-Conserving Therapy in Patients With Multiple Ipsilateral Breast Cancer: Results From ACOSOG Z11102 (Alliance), 2023, Journal of Clinical Oncology

Frequent coauthors in their research include:

  • Alice Chung
  • Farin Amersi
  • Xiaojiang Cui
  • Farnaz Dadmanesh
  • Marissa K. Srour

The venues where Armando E. Giuliano has regularly published include:

  • Annals of Surgical Oncology
  • Cancer Research
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • The American Surgeon
  • The Breast Journal

Best Publications

  • Lymphatic Mapping and Sentinel Lymphadenectomy for Breast Cancer

    Armando Giuliano;Daniel Kirgan;J. Guenther;Donald Morton

  • Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: A randomized clinical trial

    Armando E. Giuliano;Kelly K. Hunt;Karla V. Ballman;Peter D. Beitsch

  • American Society of Clinical Oncology Guideline Recommendations for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer

    Gary H. Lyman;Armando E. Giuliano;Mark R. Somerfield;Al B. Benson

  • Locoregional recurrence after sentinel lymph node dissection with or without axillary dissection in patients with sentinel lymph node metastases: the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 randomized trial.

    Armando E. Giuliano;Linda McCall;Peter Beitsch;Pat W. Whitworth

  • Effect of Axillary Dissection vs No Axillary Dissection on 10-Year Overall Survival Among Women With Invasive Breast Cancer and Sentinel Node Metastasis: The ACOSOG Z0011 (Alliance) Randomized Clinical Trial

    Armando E. Giuliano;Karla V. Ballman;Linda McCall;Peter D. Beitsch

  • Sentinel lymphadenectomy in breast cancer.

    A E Giuliano;R C Jones;M Brennan;R Statman

  • Society of surgical oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages i and II invasive breast cancer

    Meena S. Moran;Stuart J. Schnitt;Armando E. Giuliano;Jay R. Harris

  • Improved axillary staging of breast cancer with sentinel lymphadenectomy.

    Armando E. Giuliano;Paul S. Dale;Roderick R. Turner;Donald L. Morton

  • Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update

    Gary H. Lyman;Sarah Temin;Stephen B. Edge;Lisa A. Newman

  • Surgical Complications Associated With Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection (SLND) Plus Axillary Lymph Node Dissection Compared With SLND Alone in the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Trial Z0011

    Anthony Lucci;Linda Mackie McCall;Peter D. Beitsch;Patrick W. Whitworth

  • Dietary Fat Reduction and Breast Cancer Outcome: Interim Efficacy Results From the Women's Intervention Nutrition Study

    Rowan T. Chlebowski;George L. Blackburn;Cynthia A. Thomson;Daniel W. Nixon

  • Breast Cancer—Major changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual

    Armando E. Giuliano;James L. Connolly;Stephen B. Edge;Elizabeth A. Mittendorf

  • Most Early Disseminated Cancer Cells Detected in Bone Marrow of Breast Cancer Patients Have a Putative Breast Cancer Stem Cell Phenotype

    Marija Balic;Henry Lin;Lillian Young;Debra Hawes

  • Histopathologic validation of the sentinel lymph node hypothesis for breast carcinoma.

    Roderick R. Turner;David W. Ollila;David L. Krasne;Armando E. Giuliano

  • Prospective Observational Study of Sentinel Lymphadenectomy Without Further Axillary Dissection in Patients With Sentinel Node–Negative Breast Cancer

    Armando E. Giuliano;Philip I. Haigh;Meghan B. Brennan;Nora M. Hansen

  • Surgical Complications Associated With Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy: Results From a Prospective International Cooperative Group Trial

    Lee Gravatt Wilke;Linda M. McCall;Katherine E. Posther;Pat W. Whitworth

  • Adjuvant chemotherapy for osteosarcoma: a randomized prospective trial.

    F Eilber;A Giuliano;J Eckardt;K Patterson

  • Direct Serum Assay for MicroRNA-21 Concentrations in Early and Advanced Breast Cancer

    Sota Asaga;Christine Kuo;Tung Nguyen;Marilou Terpenning

  • Do all patients with sentinel node metastasis from breast carcinoma need complete axillary node dissection

    Kyo U. Chu;Roderick R. Turner;Nora M. Hansen;Meghan B. Brennan

  • Locoregional Recurrence After Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection With or Without Axillary Dissection in Patients with Sentinel Lymph Node Metastases: Long-Term Follow-Up from the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (Alliance) ACOSOG Z0011 Randomized Trial

    Armando E. Giuliano;Karla Ballman;Linda McCall;Peter Beitsch

Frequent Co-Authors

Dave S.B. Hoon
Dave S.B. Hoon St. John's University
Myles C. Cabot
Myles C. Cabot East Carolina University
Karla V. Ballman
Karla V. Ballman Cornell University
Monica Morrow
Monica Morrow Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Kelly K. Hunt
Kelly K. Hunt The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Donald L. Morton
Donald L. Morton Saint John's Health Center
Douglas S. Reintgen
Douglas S. Reintgen University of South Florida
Bruce G. Haffty
Bruce G. Haffty Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Stephen B. Edge
Stephen B. Edge Roswell Park Cancer Institute
David Elashoff
David Elashoff University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens doors to a wide range of healthcare careers, many of which can be started or accelerated online. For those interested in leadership roles, healthcare administration programs provide the skills to manage healthcare facilities and navigate the business side of medicine.

Nurses looking to advance can bridge from an associate degree to a nurse practitioner role through specialized adn to np bridge programs. These flexible online options help current RNs earn a master's degree and expand their clinical impact.

Preventive care and wellness are also in demand. Individuals passionate about diet, wellness, and public health can enroll in reputable nutrition degrees online, building expertise to support healthier communities.

For higher-level administrative roles, consider one of the top cahme-accredited mha programs. These programs carry respected accreditation and prepare graduates for executive leadership in hospitals, clinics, and other healthcare organizations.

With the growth of online education, there are now more accessible pathways into medicine and related fields—helping you find your ideal healthcare career in today’s digital world.

Best Scientists Citing Armando E. Giuliano

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles