World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 126 2993 2793 1657 1524 732 49165

Henry Mark Kuerer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Henry Mark Kuerer between 1988 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Henry Mark Kuerer published across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025, averaging 20.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 49 publications in 2005. 44 of the 766 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 49. Peak 49 publications in 2005. 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 22 publications 2002: 32 publications 2003: 19 publications 2004: 47 publications 2005: 49 publications 2006: 47 publications 2007: 37 publications 2008: 27 publications 2009: 30 publications 2010: 16 publications 2011: 42 publications 2012: 46 publications 2013: 29 publications 2014: 37 publications 2015: 31 publications 2016: 32 publications 2017: 36 publications 2018: 24 publications 2019: 23 publications 2020: 22 publications 2021: 22 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 17 publications 2024: 23 publications 2025: 21 publications
1988 2025

766 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Henry Mark Kuerer: publications per year, 1988 to 2025
Year Publications
1988 1
1989 0
1990 0
1991 2
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 2
1996 0
1997 2
1998 6
1999 5
2000 9
2001 22
2002 32
2003 19
2004 47
2005 49
2006 47
2007 37
2008 27
2009 30
2010 16
2011 42
2012 46
2013 29
2014 37
2015 31
2016 32
2017 36
2018 24
2019 23
2020 22
2021 22
2022 8
2023 17
2024 23
2025 21
Total 766
Download as CSV

Henry Mark Kuerer publications per year - data summary

  • Henry Mark Kuerer, a Medicine scholar from The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, has 766 publications recorded across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1988 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2005, with 49 publications.
  • The least productive year with any output is 1988, with 1 publication.
  • 6 of the 38 years in the span carry no publications at all (1989, 1990, 1992, 1993 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 20.2 papers per year over the whole span, or 23.9 per year counting only the 32 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 91 publications, 12% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1988-2000: 27 publications (2.1 per year); 2001-2013: 443 publications (34.1 per year); 2014-2025: 296 publications (24.7 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Henry Mark Kuerer publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Henry Mark Kuerer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 721–740 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 732 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259 732
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Henry Mark Kuerer publication distribution in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 101–120 to 1,796+ publications.
  • Henry Mark Kuerer, a Medicine scholar from The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, records 732 publications - the 83rd percentile of the discipline.
  • 83% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Henry Mark Kuerer, and about 17% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 441–460 publications range, and Henry Mark Kuerer ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 341–360 publications, holding 922 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 64% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 521–540 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Henry Mark Kuerer D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Henry Mark Kuerer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 126–127 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 126 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252 126
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Henry Mark Kuerer D-index placement in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 75 ranges running from 70–71 to 217+ D-Index.
  • Henry Mark Kuerer, a Medicine scholar from The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, records 126 D-Index - the 86th percentile of the discipline.
  • 86% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Henry Mark Kuerer, and about 14% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 94–95 D-Index range, and Henry Mark Kuerer ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 82–83 D-Index, holding 1,027 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 106–107 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Henry Mark Kuerer is affiliated with The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in the United States. Their work primarily focuses on medical research within the field of oncology, with a significant concentration on breast cancer treatment studies.

Their recent impactful publications include:

  • Eliminating the breast cancer surgery paradigm after neoadjuvant systemic therapy: current evidence and future challenges, 2020, Annals of Oncology
  • Eliminating breast surgery for invasive breast cancer in exceptional responders to neoadjuvant systemic therapy: a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial, 2022, The Lancet Oncology
  • Accuracy of Post-Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Image-Guided Breast Biopsy to Predict Residual Cancer, 2020, JAMA Surgery
  • Breast conservation and axillary management after primary systemic therapy in patients with early-stage breast cancer: the Lucerne toolbox, 2020, The Lancet Oncology
  • Identification of breast cancer patients with pathologic complete response in the breast after neoadjuvant systemic treatment by an intelligent vacuum-assisted biopsy, 2020, European Journal of Cancer

The areas of study for Henry Mark Kuerer cover broad medical disciplines as well as specialized subfields:

  • Medicine
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

  • Cancer Research
  • Oncology
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Surgery
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

The main research topics include:

  • Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
  • Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
  • Breast Implant and Reconstruction
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
  • Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology

Frequent co-authors working with Henry Mark Kuerer include:

  • Benjamin D. Smith
  • Kelly K. Hunt
  • Mediget Teshome
  • Susie X. Sun
  • Abigail S. Caudle

The scientist has contributed extensively to several publication venues, including:

  • Annals of Surgical Oncology
  • European Journal of Surgical Oncology
  • Cancer Research
  • International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology

Best Publications

  • Measurement of Residual Breast Cancer Burden to Predict Survival After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

    W. Fraser Symmans;Florentia Peintinger;Christos Hatzis;Radhika Rajan

  • Clinical Course of Breast Cancer Patients With Complete Pathologic Primary Tumor and Axillary Lymph Node Response to Doxorubicin-Based Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

    Henry M. Kuerer;Lisa A. Newman;Terry L. Smith;Fred C. Ames

  • Sentinel Lymph Node Surgery After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Node-Positive Breast Cancer: The ACOSOG Z1071 (Alliance) Clinical Trial

    Judy C. Boughey;Vera J. Suman;Elizabeth A. Mittendorf;Gretchen M. Ahrendt

  • Improved Axillary Evaluation Following Neoadjuvant Therapy for Patients With Node-Positive Breast Cancer Using Selective Evaluation of Clipped Nodes: Implementation of Targeted Axillary Dissection

    Abigail S. Caudle;Wei T. Yang;Savitri Krishnamurthy;Elizabeth A. Mittendorf

  • Circulating tumour cells in non-metastatic breast cancer: a prospective study

    Anthony Lucci;Carolyn S Hall;Ashutosh K. Lodhi;Anirban Bhattacharyya

  • Microtubule-associated protein tau: a marker of paclitaxel sensitivity in breast cancer.

    Roman Rouzier;Radhika Rajan;Peter Wagner;Kenneth R. Hess

  • Meta-analysis of sentinel lymph node biopsy after preoperative chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer.

    Y. Xing;M. Foy;D. D. Cox;H. M. Kuerer

  • Outcome After Pathologic Complete Eradication of Cytologically Proven Breast Cancer Axillary Node Metastases Following Primary Chemotherapy

    Bryan T. Hennessy;Gabriel N. Hortobagyi;Roman Rouzier;Henry Kuerer

  • Treatment of pregnant breast cancer patients and outcomes of children exposed to chemotherapy in utero

    Karin M.E. Hahn;Peter H. Johnson;Nancy Gordon;Henry Kuerer

  • Improved peak detection and quantification of mass spectrometry data acquired from surface-enhanced laser desorption and ionization by denoising spectra with the undecimated discrete wavelet transform

    Kevin R. Coombes;Spiridon Tsavachidis;Jeffrey Morris;Keith A Baggerly

  • Breast conservation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: the MD Anderson cancer center experience.

    Allen M. Chen;Funda Meric-Bernstam;Kelly K. Hunt;Howard D. Thames

  • Invasive Lobular Carcinoma Classic Type: Response to Primary Chemotherapy and Survival Outcomes

    Massimo Cristofanilli;Ana Gonzalez-Angulo;Nour Sneige;Shu Wan Kau

  • Breast cancer on the world wide web: cross sectional survey of quality of information and popularity of websites

    Funda Meric;Elmer V Bernstam;Nadeem Q Mirza;Kelly K Hunt

  • RTOG 9804: A Prospective Randomized Trial for Good-Risk Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Comparing Radiotherapy With Observation

    Beryl McCormick;Kathryn Winter;Clifford Hudis;Henry Mark Kuerer

  • Role of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of indeterminate and suspicious axillary lymph nodes in the initial staging of breast carcinoma

    Savitri Krishnamurthy;Nour Sneige;Deepak G. Bedi;Beth S. Edieken

  • Incidence and impact of documented eradication of breast cancer axillary lymph node metastases before surgery in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

    Henry M. Kuerer;Aysegul A. Sahin;Kelly K. Hunt;Lisa A. Newman

  • Delayed-immediate breast reconstruction.

    Steven J. Kronowitz;Kelly K Hunt;Henry Mark Kuerer;Gildy Babiera

  • Long-term primary results of accelerated partial breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery for early-stage breast cancer: a randomised, phase 3, equivalence trial

    Frank A Vicini;Reena S Cecchini;Julia R White;Douglas W Arthur

  • Sentinel lymph node surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is accurate and reduces the need for axillary dissection in breast cancer patients.

    Kelly K. Hunt;Min Yi;Elizabeth A. Mittendorf;Cynthia Guerrero

  • Predictors of invasive breast cancer in patients with an initial diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ: a guide to selective use of sentinel lymph node biopsy in management of ductal carcinoma in situ.

    Tina W.F. Yen;Kelly K. Hunt;Merrick I. Ross;Nadeem Q. Mirza

Frequent Co-Authors

Kelly K. Hunt
Kelly K. Hunt The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Gildy Babiera
Gildy Babiera The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Funda Meric-Bernstam
Funda Meric-Bernstam The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Merrick I. Ross
Merrick I. Ross The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
S. Eva Singletary
S. Eva Singletary The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Thomas A. Buchholz
Thomas A. Buchholz The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Elizabeth A. Mittendorf
Elizabeth A. Mittendorf Brigham and Women's Hospital
Anthony Lucci
Anthony Lucci The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Gabriel N. Hortobagyi
Gabriel N. Hortobagyi The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Savitri Krishnamurthy
Savitri Krishnamurthy The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine or healthcare doesn’t always mean following the traditional path of an MD program. There are a range of which online healthcare administration programs have cahme accreditation? that can lead to roles in hospital management, policy, and healthcare leadership. These CAHME-accredited programs ensure high standards and open doors to top administrative positions.

For nurses, options are expanding beyond campus-based programs. If you're already an RN, you may be interested in learning about rn to bsn online with no clinicals, which allow you to advance your credentials without in-person clinical requirements—ideal for working professionals.

Those aiming for doctoral-level roles will find a variety of accelerated online nursing doctorates. To help you compare, explore the shortest dnp programs online as well as the shortest dnp program options, both designed to help you achieve your goals faster.

Online degrees offer flexibility and diverse specializations—making it easier than ever to launch or advance a healthcare career beyond traditional medical school.

Best Scientists Citing Henry Mark Kuerer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles