World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
81
Citations
24378
World Ranking
16638
National Ranking
8349

Savitri Krishnamurthy publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Savitri Krishnamurthy sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 554 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Savitri Krishnamurthy D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Savitri Krishnamurthy sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Savitri Krishnamurthy is affiliated with The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in the United States. Their research work focuses extensively on oncology and cancer-related fields within the broader areas of medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology.

The scientist has contributed predominantly to subfields including:

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research
  • Molecular Biology
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Main topics explored in their publications cover:

  • Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
  • Cancer Cells and Metastasis
  • HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
  • Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • AI in cancer detection

Frequent publication venues for Savitri Krishnamurthy include:

  • Cancer Research
  • Cancer Cytopathology
  • Clinical Cancer Research
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology

The scientist has collaborated frequently with several researchers, notably:

  • Naoto T. Ueno (50 joint publications)
  • Wendy A. Woodward (40 joint publications)
  • Debu Tripathy (38 joint publications)
  • Vicente Valero (25 joint publications)
  • Alastair M. Thompson (19 joint publications)

Key recent papers authored or co-authored by Savitri Krishnamurthy include:

  • "Spatial charting of single-cell transcriptomes in tissues," 2022, Nature Biotechnology
  • "Eliminating breast surgery for invasive breast cancer in exceptional responders to neoadjuvant systemic therapy: a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial," 2022, The Lancet Oncology
  • "Accuracy of Post-Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Image-Guided Breast Biopsy to Predict Residual Cancer," 2020, JAMA Surgery
  • "TRPS1, GATA3, and SOX10 expression in triple-negative breast carcinoma," 2022, Human Pathology
  • "Decorin-mediated suppression of tumorigenesis, invasion, and metastasis in inflammatory breast cancer," 2021, Communications Biology

Best Publications

  • Landscape of somatic mutations in 560 breast cancer whole-genome sequences

    Serena Nik-Zainal;Serena Nik-Zainal;Helen Davies;Johan Staaf;Manasa Ramakrishna

  • Characterization of a naturally occurring breast cancer subset enriched in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and stem cell characteristics.

    Bryan T. Hennessy;Ana Maria Gonzalez-Angulo;Katherine Stemke-Hale;Michael Z. Gilcrease

  • Patterns of somatic structural variation in human cancer genomes

    Yilong Li;Nicola D Roberts;Jeremiah A Wala;Jeremiah A Wala;Ofer Shapira;Ofer Shapira

  • Improved Axillary Evaluation Following Neoadjuvant Therapy for Patients With Node-Positive Breast Cancer Using Selective Evaluation of Clipped Nodes: Implementation of Targeted Axillary Dissection

    Abigail S. Caudle;Wei T. Yang;Savitri Krishnamurthy;Elizabeth A. Mittendorf

  • Circulating tumour cells in non-metastatic breast cancer: a prospective study

    Anthony Lucci;Carolyn S Hall;Ashutosh K. Lodhi;Anirban Bhattacharyya

  • International expert panel on inflammatory breast cancer: consensus statement for standardized diagnosis and treatment

    S. Dawood;S. D. Merajver;P. Viens;P. B. Vermeulen

  • Inflammatory Breast Cancer: The Disease, the Biology, the Treatment

    Fredika M. Robertson;Melissa Bondy;Wei Yang;Hideko Yamauchi

  • Role of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of indeterminate and suspicious axillary lymph nodes in the initial staging of breast carcinoma

    Savitri Krishnamurthy;Nour Sneige;Deepak G. Bedi;Beth S. Edieken

  • Cortical morphologic features of axillary lymph nodes as a predictor of metastasis in breast cancer: in vitro sonographic study.

    Deepak G. Bedi;Rajesh Krishnamurthy;Savitri Krishnamurthy;Beth S. Edeiken

  • Clinicopathologic factors predicting involvement of nonsentinel axillary nodes in women with breast cancer.

    Rosa F. Hwang;Savitri Krishnamurthy;Kelly K. Hunt;Nadeem Mirza

  • Classifying local disease recurrences after breast conservation therapy based on location and histology: new primary tumors have more favorable outcomes than true local disease recurrences.

    Eugene Huang;Thomas A. Buchholz;Funda Meric;Savitri Krishnamurthy

  • CT-guided Percutaneous Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy of Small (≤1-cm) Pulmonary Lesions

    Michael J. Wallace;Savitri Krishnamurthy;Lyle D. Broemeling;Sanjay Gupta

  • Thyroid hormone and breast carcinoma. Primary hypothyroidism is associated with a reduced incidence of primary breast carcinoma.

    Massimo Cristofanilli;Yuko Yamamura;Shu Wan Kau;Therese Bartholomew Bevers

  • Comparison of assay methods for detection of circulating tumor cells in metastatic breast cancer: AdnaGen AdnaTest BreastCancer Select/Detect™ versus Veridex CellSearch™ system.

    E. Andreopoulou;L. Y. Yang;K. M. Rangel;J. M. Reuben

  • Breast Cancer Metastasis: Challenges and Opportunities

    Jing Lu;Patricia S. Steeg;Janet E. Price;Savitri Krishnamurthy

  • Total RNA yield and microarray gene expression profiles from fine‐needle aspiration biopsy and core‐needle biopsy samples of breast carcinoma

    W. Fraser Symmans;Mark Ayers;Edwin A. Clark;James Stec

  • Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Breast

    Bryan T. Hennessy;Savitri Krishnamurthy;Sharon Giordano;Thomas A. Buchholz

  • Positive surgical margins and ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence predict disease-specific survival after breast-conserving therapy.

    Funda Meric;M.P.H. Nadeem Q. Mirza M.D.;Georges Vlastos;Thomas A. Buchholz

  • Clinical, Histopathologic, and Biologic Features of Pleomorphic Lobular (Ductal-Lobular) Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast: A Report of 24 Cases

    Nour Sneige;Jianzhou Wang;Barbara A Baker;Savitri Krishnamurthy

  • Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: State of the Science and Roadmap to Advance the Field

    Henry M. Kuerer;Constance T. Albarracin;Wei T. Yang;Robert D. Cardiff

Frequent Co-Authors

Anthony Lucci
Anthony Lucci The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Henry Mark Kuerer
Henry Mark Kuerer The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Wendy A. Woodward
Wendy A. Woodward The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Naoto T. Ueno
Naoto T. Ueno University of Hawaiʻi Cancer Center
James M. Reuben
James M. Reuben The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Massimo Cristofanilli
Massimo Cristofanilli Cornell University
Gabriel N. Hortobagyi
Gabriel N. Hortobagyi The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Vicente Valero
Vicente Valero The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Kelly K. Hunt
Kelly K. Hunt The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Thomas A. Buchholz
Thomas A. Buchholz The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring careers in medicine doesn't just mean becoming a doctor. There are many flexible online degree options that can help you enter or advance in the healthcare field. For nurses, rn to bsn online programs offer a convenient way to earn a bachelor's degree and open up new career opportunities.

If you’re not already a nurse but hold a non-nursing bachelor’s degree, consider online direct entry msn programs for non-nurses to fast-track your path into advanced nursing practice.

For students seeking easier admission, there are nursing schools with high acceptance rates that can be ideal starting points for your healthcare journey.

If direct patient care doesn’t appeal to you, the administrative side of healthcare offers strong career prospects. The best online medical billing and coding schools can help you quickly develop skills for an in-demand field, often with flexible schedules and financial aid options.

Best Scientists Citing Savitri Krishnamurthy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles