World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
37
Citations
10095
World Ranking
10490
National Ranking
4392

Mayur Naik publications per year

1999: 1 publications 2000: 1 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publications 2003: 1 publications 2004: 1 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 1 publications 2007: 1 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 1 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 11 publications
1999 2025

133 publications in total across all disciplines

Mayur Naik publication distribution in Computer Science in 2027

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2027. The highlighted bar marks where Mayur Naik sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 100 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Mayur Naik D-index placement in Computer Science in 2027

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2027. The highlighted bar marks where Mayur Naik sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mayur Naik is affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Computer Science, with a total of 73 publications. Their work covers several subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Software, Information Systems, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, and Signal Processing.

The main topics of their research include Software Engineering Research, Software Testing and Debugging Techniques, Machine Learning and Data Classification, Advanced Malware Detection Techniques, Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), Multimodal Machine Learning Applications, and Software Reliability and Analysis Research.

Mayur Naik has published extensively in several venues, among which the most frequent are:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
  • Proceedings of the 2022 ACM on Asia Conference on Computer and Communications Security

Some of their recent papers include:

  • HOPPITY: LEARNING GRAPH TRANSFORMATIONS TO DETECT AND FIX BUGS IN PROGRAMS, 2021, OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)
  • DeepMerge: Learning to Merge Programs, 2022, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
  • Scallop: A Language for Neurosymbolic Programming, 2023, Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages
  • IRIS: LLM-Assisted Static Analysis for Detecting Security Vulnerabilities, 2024, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • GENSYNTH: Synthesizing Datalog Programs without Language Bias, 2021, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Mayur Naik include:

  • Aaditya Naik
  • Yinjun Wu
  • Eric Wong
  • Rajeev Alur
  • Adam Stein

Best Publications

  • CloneCloud: elastic execution between mobile device and cloud

    Byung-Gon Chun;Sunghwan Ihm;Petros Maniatis;Mayur Naik

  • Scalable statistical bug isolation

    Ben Liblit;Mayur Naik;Alice X. Zheng;Alex Aiken

  • Dynodroid: an input generation system for Android apps

    Aravind Machiry;Rohan Tahiliani;Mayur Naik

  • Effective static race detection for Java

    Mayur Naik;Alex Aiken;John Whaley

  • Automated concolic testing of smartphone apps

    Saswat Anand;Mayur Naik;Mary Jean Harrold;Hongseok Yang

  • From symptom to cause: localizing errors in counterexample traces

    Thomas Ball;Mayur Naik;Sriram K. Rajamani

  • Statistical debugging: simultaneous identification of multiple bugs

    Alice X. Zheng;Michael I. Jordan;Ben Liblit;Mayur Naik

  • COSMOS: computation offloading as a service for mobile devices

    Cong Shi;Karim Habak;Pranesh Pandurangan;Mostafa Ammar

  • A randomized dynamic program analysis technique for detecting real deadlocks

    Pallavi Joshi;Chang-Seo Park;Koushik Sen;Mayur Naik

  • Effective static deadlock detection

    Mayur Naik;Chang-Seo Park;Koushik Sen

  • Conditional must not aliasing for static race detection

    Mayur Naik;Alex Aiken

  • Predicting Execution Time of Computer Programs Using Sparse Polynomial Regression

    Ling Huang;Jinzhu Jia;Bin Yu;Byung-gon Chun

  • CalFuzzer: An Extensible Active Testing Framework for Concurrent Programs

    Pallavi Joshi;Mayur Naik;Chang-Seo Park;Koushik Sen

  • Effective Program Debloating via Reinforcement Learning

    Kihong Heo;Woosuk Lee;Pardis Pashakhanloo;Mayur Naik

  • An effective dynamic analysis for detecting generalized deadlocks

    Pallavi Joshi;Mayur Naik;Koushik Sen

  • Computing in cirrus clouds: the challenge of intermittent connectivity

    Cong Shi;Mostafa H. Ammar;Ellen W. Zegura;Mayur Naik

  • Accelerating search-based program synthesis using learned probabilistic models

    Woosuk Lee;Kihong Heo;Rajeev Alur;Mayur Naik

  • On abstraction refinement for program analyses in Datalog

    Xin Zhang;Ravi Mangal;Radu Grigore;Mayur Naik

  • HOPPITY: LEARNING GRAPH TRANSFORMATIONS TO DETECT AND FIX BUGS IN PROGRAMS

    Elizabeth Dinella;Hanjun Dai;Ziyang Li;Mayur Naik

  • A user-guided approach to program analysis

    Ravi Mangal;Xin Zhang;Aditya V. Nori;Mayur Naik

  • Learning Loop Invariants for Program Verification

    Xujie Si;Hanjun Dai;Mukund Raghothaman;Mayur Naik

Frequent Co-Authors

Hongseok Yang
Hongseok Yang Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
Byung-Gon Chun
Byung-Gon Chun Seoul National University
Petros Maniatis
Petros Maniatis Google (United States)
Le Song
Le Song Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence
Ling Huang
Ling Huang Intel (United States)
Jens Palsberg
Jens Palsberg University of California, Los Angeles
Aditya V. Nori
Aditya V. Nori Microsoft (United States)
Alex Aiken
Alex Aiken Stanford University
Koushik Sen
Koushik Sen University of California, Berkeley
Rajeev Alur
Rajeev Alur University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a variety of related online degrees and career options, giving students the flexibility to tailor their education. For those interested in the physical foundations of technology, online physics degrees provide a rigorous backdrop in scientific principles that power computation and engineering.

Technology-driven roles often require advanced analytical skills. Pursuing the cheapest master in data science can help students rapidly enter one of the fastest-growing fields and become highly competitive in the job market.

For those focusing on systems and hardware, accredited online electrical engineering programs offer flexible pathways to specialized roles in automation, electronics, and energy sectors.

Additionally, professionals can boost their credentials by obtaining certifications that pay well, providing a quick route to high-paying careers in IT and tech support. Combining online degrees with industry-recognized certifications accelerates employability and career advancement.

Best Scientists Citing Mayur Naik

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles