World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
99
Citations
59297
World Ranking
382
National Ranking
210

Rajeev Alur publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rajeev Alur sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 381 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Rajeev Alur D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rajeev Alur sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 99 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2016 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 2008 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to automata, logics, and verification techniques for real-time and hybrid systems
  • 2007 - ACM Fellow For contributions to the specification and verification of reactive and hybrid systems.
  • 1999 - Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

Overview

Rajeev Alur is affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Computer Science, with extensive work in several specialized subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Software, and Information Systems.

Their publications cover a broad range of topics, particularly emphasizing Formal Methods in Verification, Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning, Software Testing and Debugging Techniques, Reinforcement Learning in Robotics, Software System Performance and Reliability, Software Engineering Research, and Software Reliability and Analysis Research.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Rajeev Alur include:

  • Kishor Jothimurugan
  • Osbert Bastani
  • Mayur Naik
  • Suguman Bansal
  • Κωνσταντίνος Καλλάς

Most of Rajeev Alur's work has been published in the following venues:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages
  • ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems
  • Formal Methods in System Design
  • Artifact Digital Object Group

Recent selected papers authored or co-authored by Rajeev Alur include:

  • "Verifying the Safety of Autonomous Systems with Neural Network Controllers," 2020, ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems
  • "Compositional Learning and Verification of Neural Network Controllers," 2021, ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems
  • "A Composable Specification Language for Reinforcement Learning Tasks," 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "DiffStream: differential output testing for stream processing programs," 2020, Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages
  • "Executing Microservice Applications on Serverless, Correctly," 2023, Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages

Rajeev Alur has been recognized with several awards, including:

  • Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 2016
  • IEEE Fellow, 2008, for contributions to automata, logics, and verification techniques for real-time and hybrid systems
  • ACM Fellow, 2007, for contributions to the specification and verification of reactive and hybrid systems
  • Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, 1999

Best Publications

  • A theory of timed automata

    Rajeev Alur;David L. Dill

  • A Temporal Logic of Nested Calls and Returns

    Rajeev Alur;Kousha Etessami;P. Madhusudan

  • The algorithmic analysis of hybrid systems

    Rajeev Alur;Costas Courcoubetis;Nicolas Halbwachs;Thomas A. Henzinger

  • Alternating-time temporal logic

    Rajeev Alur;Thomas A. Henzinger;Orna Kupferman

  • Hybrid Automata: An Algorithmic Approach to the Specification and Verification of Hybrid Systems

    Rajeev Alur;Costas Courcoubetis;Thomas A. Henzinger;Pei-Hsin Ho

  • Automata for modeling real-time systems

    Rajeev Alur;David L. Dill

  • Model-checking for real-time systems

    R. Alur;C. Courcoubetis;D. Dill

  • Model-Checking in Dense Real-Time

    R. Alur;C. Courcoubetis;D. Dill

  • Discrete abstractions of hybrid systems

    R. Alur;T.A. Henzinger;G. Lafferriere;G.J. Pappas

  • A really temporal logic

    Rajeev Alur;Thomas A. Henzinger

  • Reactive Modules

    Rajeev Alur;Thomas A. Henzinger

  • Automatic symbolic verification of embedded systems

    R. Alur;T.A. Henzinger;Pei-Hsin Ho

  • The benefits of relaxing punctuality

    Rajeev Alur;Tomás Feder;Thomas A. Henzinger

  • Logics and Models of Real Time: A Survey

    Rajeev Alur;Thomas A. Henzinger

  • Syntax-guided synthesis

    Rajeev Alur;Rastislav Bodik;Garvit Juniwal;Milo M. K. Martin

  • Real-time logics: complexity and expressiveness

    R. Alur;T.A. Henzinger

  • Timed Automata

    Rajeev Alur

  • Visibly pushdown languages

    Rajeev Alur;P. Madhusudan

  • Timed Automata

    Unknown

  • Syntax-Guided Synthesis.

    Rajeev Alur;Rastislav Bodík;Eric Dallal;Dana Fisman

  • Real-Time Logics

    R. Alur;T.A. Henzinger

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas A. Henzinger
Thomas A. Henzinger Institute of Science and Technology Austria
P. Madhusudan
P. Madhusudan University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
George J. Pappas
George J. Pappas University of Pennsylvania
Milo M. K. Martin
Milo M. K. Martin Google (United States)
Insup Lee
Insup Lee University of Pennsylvania
Mihalis Yannakakis
Mihalis Yannakakis Columbia University
Kousha Etessami
Kousha Etessami University of Edinburgh
Doron Peled
Doron Peled Bar-Ilan University
Swarat Chaudhuri
Swarat Chaudhuri The University of Texas at Austin
Costas Courcoubetis
Costas Courcoubetis Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science as a field of study opens up opportunities to pair your major with complementary subjects. Many students find success by considering majors in college that align with their interests in technology, business, or engineering. This strategic approach can enhance skills and expand career options in the growing tech market.

For those seeking a flexible path, there are several easy masters programs to get into online. These programs offer a smoother admission process and often provide accelerated learning for working professionals or recent graduates.

Continuing education doesn’t have to be costly. If you are aiming for advanced credentials, you can find some of the cheapest doctoral programs online that offer quality education at a lower cost. Additionally, educators looking for leadership roles may benefit from cheapest online edd programs that are both flexible and affordable.

As the demand for computer science skills grows, leveraging a well-planned educational pathway can lead to rewarding and diverse career opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Rajeev Alur

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles