World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
46
Citations
11870
World Ranking
6719
National Ranking
2967

Milo M. K. Martin publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Milo M. K. Martin sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 82 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Milo M. K. Martin D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Milo M. K. Martin sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Milo M. K. Martin is affiliated with Google in the United States. Their professional focus lies within the domain of computer science and technology as suggested by their association with a major technology corporation.

The available data does not list any recent papers or publications by Milo M. K. Martin, nor are there documented co-authors or frequent publication venues connected to their work. There is also no recorded information regarding book publications or awards received.

No specific details about their fields of study, subfields, or the main research topics they have worked on are present. The absence of published papers, co-authors, and venues implies limited publicly available bibliographic or scientific data about their scholarly contributions at this time.

Best Publications

  • Multifacet's general execution-driven multiprocessor simulator (GEMS) toolset

    Milo M. K. Martin;Daniel J. Sorin;Bradford M. Beckmann;Michael R. Marty

  • Syntax-guided synthesis

    Rajeev Alur;Rastislav Bodik;Garvit Juniwal;Milo M. K. Martin

  • SoftBound: highly compatible and complete spatial memory safety for c

    Santosh Nagarakatte;Jianzhou Zhao;Milo M.K. Martin;Steve Zdancewic

  • Syntax-Guided Synthesis.

    Rajeev Alur;Rastislav Bodík;Eric Dallal;Dana Fisman

  • CETS: compiler enforced temporal safety for C

    Santosh Nagarakatte;Jianzhou Zhao;Milo M.K. Martin;Steve Zdancewic

  • SafetyNet: improving the availability of shared memory multiprocessors with global checkpoint/recovery

    Daniel J. Sorin;Milo M. K. Martin;Mark D. Hill;David A. Wood

  • Overcoming an Untrusted Computing Base: Detecting and Removing Malicious Hardware Automatically

    Matthew Hicks;Murph Finnicum;Samuel T. King;Milo M. K. Martin

  • Token Coherence: decoupling performance and correctness

    Milo M. K. Martin;Mark D. Hill;David A. Wood

  • Why on-chip cache coherence is here to stay

    Milo M. K. Martin;Mark D. Hill;Daniel J. Sorin

  • Subtleties of transactional memory atomicity semantics

    C. Blundell;E.C. Lewis;M.M.K. Martin

  • Syntax-guided synthesis

    Rajeev Alur;Rastislav Bodik;Garvit Juniwal;Milo M. K. Martin

  • Formalizing the LLVM intermediate representation for verified program transformations

    Jianzhou Zhao;Santosh Nagarakatte;Milo M.K. Martin;Steve Zdancewic

  • Hardbound: architectural support for spatial safety of the C programming language

    Joe Devietti;Colin Blundell;Milo M. K. Martin;Steve Zdancewic

  • CheckFence: checking consistency of concurrent data types on relaxed memory models

    Sebastian Burckhardt;Rajeev Alur;Milo M. K. Martin

  • Computational sprinting

    Arun Raghavan;Yixin Luo;Anuj Chandawalla;Marios Papaefthymiou

  • TRANSIT: specifying protocols with concolic snippets

    Abhishek Udupa;Arun Raghavan;Jyotirmoy V. Deshmukh;Sela Mador-Haim

  • Simulating a $2M commercial server on a $2K PC

    A.R. Alameldeen;M.M.K. Martin;C.J. Mauer;K.E. Moore

  • Making the fast case common and the uncommon case simple in unbounded transactional memory

    Colin Blundell;Joe Devietti;E. Christopher Lewis;Milo M. K. Martin

  • Deconstructing Transactional Semantics: The Subtleties of Atomicity

    Colin Blundell;E Christopher Lewis;Milo M. K. Martin

  • Using destination-set prediction to improve the latency/bandwidth tradeoff in shared-memory multiprocessors

    Milo M. K. Martin;Pacia J. Harper;Daniel J. Sorin;Mark D. Hill

  • An axiomatic memory model for POWER multiprocessors

    Sela Mador-Haim;Luc Maranget;Susmit Sarkar;Kayvan Memarian

Frequent Co-Authors

Rajeev Alur
Rajeev Alur University of Pennsylvania
Mark D. Hill
Mark D. Hill University of Wisconsin–Madison
Daniel J. Sorin
Daniel J. Sorin Duke University
Steve Zdancewic
Steve Zdancewic University of Pennsylvania
Thomas F. Wenisch
Thomas F. Wenisch University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Kevin P. Pipe
Kevin P. Pipe University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Marios C. Papaefthymiou
Marios C. Papaefthymiou University of California, Irvine
Stavros Tripakis
Stavros Tripakis Northeastern University
Alaa R. Alameldeen
Alaa R. Alameldeen Intel (United States)
Sanjit A. Seshia
Sanjit A. Seshia University of California, Berkeley

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens the door to a range of related online degrees and career pathways. Many students expand their technical expertise by pursuing a cyber security bachelor degree online. This is a rapidly growing field focused on protecting digital systems and data, with high demand for skilled professionals.

Other students might prefer the structured environment of construction technology. If so, advancing your skills with an online construction management masters can prepare you for leadership roles and projects blending IT and construction.

For those interested in law, forensics, or public safety, evaluating the criminal justice degree cost can help you budget for a career that combines computer science with criminal justice, such as cybersecurity investigation.

Financial technology (fintech) is another fast-growing sector. Taking accounting classes online equips you with skills for data analysis, auditing, or merging IT with finance roles.

These diverse online options offer flexible learning for those pursuing specialized careers related to computer science, making it easier to develop skills in high-demand industries.

Best Scientists Citing Milo M. K. Martin

Trending Scientists