World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
93
Citations
35761
World Ranking
514
National Ranking
274

Mark D. Hill publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark D. Hill sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 296 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Mark D. Hill D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark D. Hill sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 93 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2019 - ACM - IEEE CS Eckert-Mauchly Award For contributions to the design and evaluation of memory systems and parallel computers.
  • 2004 - ACM Fellow For contributions to memory consistency models and memory system design.

Overview

Mark D. Hill is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on computer science, with particular emphasis on computer networks and communications, hardware and architecture, and information systems.

The scientist has contributed significantly to subfields such as computer networks and communications, hardware and architecture, information systems, electrical and electronic engineering, and statistical and nonlinear physics. Their main topics of research include parallel computing and optimization techniques, distributed systems and fault tolerance, interconnection networks and systems, advanced data storage technologies, embedded systems design techniques, distributed and parallel computing systems, and cloud computing and resource management.

Mark D. Hill has multiple publications in well-known venues, including:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Communications of the ACM
  • IEEE Micro
  • Synthesis lectures on computer architecture
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich)

Among recent papers authored or co-authored by Mark D. Hill are:

  • "Design Tradeoffs in CXL-Based Memory Pools for Public Cloud Platforms," 2023, IEEE Micro
  • "A Primer on Memory Consistency and Cache Coherence, Second Edition," 2020, Synthesis lectures on computer architecture
  • "A vision to compute like nature," 2021, Communications of the ACM
  • "Pond: CXL-Based Memory Pooling Systems for Cloud Platforms," 2022, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Accelerator-level parallelism," 2021, Communications of the ACM

In addition to journal articles, their book publications include a work with Morgan & Claypool Publishers titled A Primer on Memory Consistency and Cache Coherence, published in 2020.

Frequent co-authors of Mark D. Hill include:

  • Daniel J. Sorin (13 collaborations)
  • Vijay Nagarajan (12 collaborations)
  • David A. Wood (11 collaborations)
  • Ian Foster (3 collaborations)
  • William Gropp (3 collaborations)

Mark D. Hill has been recognized with awards such as the ACM - IEEE CS Eckert-Mauchly Award in 2019 for contributions to the design and evaluation of memory systems and parallel computers. They were also named an ACM Fellow in 2004 for contributions to memory consistency models and memory system design.

Best Publications

  • The gem5 simulator

    Nathan Binkert;Bradford Beckmann;Gabriel Black;Steven K. Reinhardt

  • Multifacet's general execution-driven multiprocessor simulator (GEMS) toolset

    Milo M. K. Martin;Daniel J. Sorin;Bradford M. Beckmann;Michael R. Marty

  • Amdahl's Law in the Multicore Era

    M.D. Hill;M.R. Marty

  • LogTM: log-based transactional memory

    K.E. Moore;J. Bobba;M.J. Moravan;M.D. Hill

  • Weak ordering-a new definition

    Sarita V. Adve;Mark D. Hill

  • Evaluating associativity in CPU caches

    M.D. Hill;A.J. Smith

  • DBMSs on a Modern Processor: Where Does Time Go?

    Anastassia Ailamaki;David J. DeWitt;Mark D. Hill;David A. Wood

  • Weak ordering—a new definition

    Unknown

  • The Wisconsin Wind Tunnel: virtual prototyping of parallel computers

    Steven K. Reinhardt;Mark D. Hill;James R. Larus;Alvin R. Lebeck

  • Weaving Relations for Cache Performance

    Anastassia Ailamaki;David J. DeWitt;Mark D. Hill;Marios Skounakis

  • A "flight data recorder" for enabling full-system multiprocessor deterministic replay

    Min Xu;Rastislav Bodik;Mark D. Hill

  • Cache-conscious structure layout

    Trishul M. Chilimbi;Mark D. Hill;James R. Larus

  • A Primer on Memory Consistency and Cache Coherence

    Daniel J. Sorin;Mark D. Hill;David A. Wood

  • LogTM-SE: Decoupling Hardware Transactional Memory from Caches

    L. Yen;J. Bobba;M.R. Marty;K.E. Moore

  • SafetyNet: improving the availability of shared memory multiprocessors with global checkpoint/recovery

    Daniel J. Sorin;Milo M. K. Martin;Mark D. Hill;David A. Wood

  • A case for direct-mapped caches

    M.D. Hill

  • Token Coherence: decoupling performance and correctness

    Milo M. K. Martin;Mark D. Hill;David A. Wood

  • Efficient virtual memory for big memory servers

    Arkaprava Basu;Jayneel Gandhi;Jichuan Chang;Mark D. Hill

  • Page placement algorithms for large real-indexed caches

    R. E. Kessler;Mark D. Hill

  • Aspects of cache memory and instruction buffer performance

    Mark Donald Hill;Alan Jay Smith

  • Amdahl’s Law in the multicore era

    M.D. Hill

Frequent Co-Authors

Erik Hagersten
Erik Hagersten Uppsala University
James R. Larus
James R. Larus École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Michael M. Swift
Michael M. Swift University of Wisconsin–Madison
Daniel J. Sorin
Daniel J. Sorin Duke University
Milo M. K. Martin
Milo M. K. Martin Google (United States)
Steven K. Reinhardt
Steven K. Reinhardt Advanced Micro Devices (United States)
Shubhendu S. Mukherjee
Shubhendu S. Mukherjee Cavium (United States)
Rastislav Bodik
Rastislav Bodik University of Washington
Sarita V. Adve
Sarita V. Adve University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Babak Falsafi
Babak Falsafi École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science studies opens the door to many online degree pathways and career options. For those beginning their academic journey, understanding what's the easiest associate's degree to get can be a smart way to start building foundational skills, especially if you prefer a faster track to entry-level jobs.

For students aiming higher, doctorate programs are also accessible online. If your interests lean toward leadership or education, you might want to research the cheapest online doctorate in educational leadership to maximize value and credibility.

Selecting a legitimate school is crucial. Be sure to consider only accredited online colleges to ensure your degree is recognized by employers and other academic institutions.

Interested in game development? There are specialized tech programs as well, and you can find an online school for game design that fits both your budget and your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Mark D. Hill

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles