World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
48
Citations
14378
World Ranking
6046
National Ranking
2727

Rastislav Bodik publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rastislav Bodik sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 146 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Rastislav Bodik D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rastislav Bodik sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - ACM Fellow For contributions to program synthesis
  • 2005 - Hellman Fellow

Overview

Rastislav Bodik is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States and has a research background primarily in computer science and engineering. Their work spans multiple subfields, including hardware and architecture, computational mechanics, software, computer networks and communications, and industrial and manufacturing engineering.

The scientist's research covers a number of key topics: parallel computing and optimization techniques, software testing and debugging techniques, 3D shape modeling and analysis, manufacturing process and optimization, distributed and parallel computing systems, advanced numerical analysis techniques, and advanced malware detection techniques.

Frequent co-authors with whom Rastislav Bodik has collaborated include Sirui Lu, Dan Caşcaval, Mira Shalah, Maneesh Agrawala, and Adriana Schulz.

Rastislav Bodik has published extensively in venues such as the Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages, arXiv (Cornell University), Computer Graphics Forum, Formal Methods in System Design, and Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research).

Notable recent publications include:

  • Differentiable 3D CAD Programs for Bidirectional Editing, 2022, Computer Graphics Forum
  • Verifying and improving Halide's term rewriting system with program synthesis, 2020, Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages
  • Grisette: Symbolic Compilation as a Functional Programming Library, 2023, Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages
  • A Lineage-Based Referencing DSL for Computer-Aided Design, 2023, Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages
  • Learning inductive invariants by sampling from frequency distributions, 2020, Formal Methods in System Design

Rastislav Bodik has received professional recognition including the ACM Fellow award in 2018 for contributions to program synthesis and the Hellman Fellowship in 2005.

Best Publications

  • Programming With Models: Writing Statistical Algorithms for General Model Structures With NIMBLE

    Perry de Valpine;Daniel Turek;Christopher J. Paciorek;Clifford Anderson-Bergman

  • Mining specifications

    Glenn Ammons;Rastislav Bodík;James R. Larus

  • A view of the parallel computing landscape

    Krste Asanovic;Rastislav Bodik;James Demmel;Tony Keaveny

  • Combinatorial sketching for finite programs

    Armando Solar-Lezama;Liviu Tancau;Rastislav Bodik;Sanjit Seshia

  • Syntax-guided synthesis

    Rajeev Alur;Rastislav Bodik;Garvit Juniwal;Milo M. K. Martin

  • Syntax-Guided Synthesis.

    Rajeev Alur;Rastislav Bodík;Eric Dallal;Dana Fisman

  • Jungloid mining: helping to navigate the API jungle

    David Mandelin;Lin Xu;Rastislav Bodík;Doug Kimelman

  • A "flight data recorder" for enabling full-system multiprocessor deterministic replay

    Min Xu;Rastislav Bodik;Mark D. Hill

  • Program synthesis by sketching

    Rastislav Bodik;Armando Solar-Lezama

  • Refinement-based context-sensitive points-to analysis for Java

    Manu Sridharan;Rastislav Bodík

  • Focusing processor policies via critical-path prediction

    Brian Fields;Shai Rubin;Rastislav Bodík

  • ABCD: eliminating array bounds checks on demand

    Rastislav Bodík;Rajiv Gupta;Vivek Sarkar

  • Programming by sketching for bit-streaming programs

    Armando Solar-Lezama;Rodric Rabbah;Rastislav Bodík;Kemal Ebcioğlu

  • Thin slicing

    Manu Sridharan;Stephen J. Fink;Rastislav Bodik

  • Syntax-guided synthesis

    Rajeev Alur;Rastislav Bodik;Garvit Juniwal;Milo M. K. Martin

  • Demand-driven points-to analysis for Java

    Manu Sridharan;Denis Gopan;Lexin Shan;Rastislav Bodík

  • A lightweight symbolic virtual machine for solver-aided host languages

    Emina Torlak;Rastislav Bodik

  • Sketching concurrent data structures

    Armando Solar-Lezama;Christopher Grant Jones;Rastislav Bodik

  • Growing solver-aided languages with rosette

    Emina Torlak;Rastislav Bodik

  • A serializability violation detector for shared-memory server programs

    Min Xu;Rastislav Bodík;Mark D. Hill

  • Synthesizing highly expressive SQL queries from input-output examples

    Chenglong Wang;Alvin Cheung;Rastislav Bodik

Frequent Co-Authors

Rajiv Gupta
Rajiv Gupta University of California, Riverside
Mark D. Hill
Mark D. Hill University of Wisconsin–Madison
Sanjit A. Seshia
Sanjit A. Seshia University of California, Berkeley
Mary Lou Soffa
Mary Lou Soffa University of Virginia
Alvin Cheung
Alvin Cheung University of California, Berkeley
Satish Chandra
Satish Chandra Association for Computing Machinery
Rajeev Alur
Rajeev Alur University of Pennsylvania
Sumit Gulwani
Sumit Gulwani Microsoft (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science online opens the door to a range of related degrees and affordable educational options. For students considering advancing their expertise, pursuing one of the cheapest phd programs can be an excellent way to earn a doctorate without incurring high student debt.

If you're looking for leadership or education-focused roles, some of the easiest edd programs allow you to quickly obtain a doctoral degree in education through fast-track online options.

For those at the start of their academic journey, an associate's degree online can help build foundational skills in as little as six months, making your entry into tech fields faster and more convenient.

Beyond computer science, consider careers in management or entrepreneurship by enrolling in an online business degree with financial aid. Doing so broadens your opportunities and supports career transitions or dual specialties.

Best Scientists Citing Rastislav Bodik

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles