World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
34
Citations
5569
World Ranking
2809
National Ranking
27

Anne Habraken publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anne Habraken sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 412 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Anne Habraken D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anne Habraken sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Overview

Anne Habraken is affiliated with the University of Liège in Belgium and has contributed extensively to the fields of engineering and materials science. Their research primarily focuses on mechanical engineering and materials chemistry, with significant work in subfields such as mechanics of materials, aerospace engineering, and automotive engineering.

Their published work centers around topics including:

  • Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
  • Metal Forming Simulation Techniques
  • Microstructure and Mechanical Properties
  • Metallurgy and Material Forming
  • High Entropy Alloys Studies
  • Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
  • Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies

Anne Habraken has authored research papers in several well-known venues, including:

  • Procedia Manufacturing
  • International Journal of Material Forming
  • Metals
  • ESAFORM 2021
  • Materials Science and Engineering A

Selected recent papers include:

  • Microstructure and Properties of SLM AlSi10Mg: Understanding the Influence of the Local Thermal History, 2020, Procedia Manufacturing
  • Analysis of ESAFORM 2021 cup drawing benchmark of an Al alloy, critical factors for accuracy and efficiency of FE simulations, 2022, International Journal of Material Forming
  • Thermal model for the directed energy deposition of composite coatings of 316L stainless steel enriched with tungsten carbides, 2021, Materials & Design
  • Fast and accurate prediction of temperature evolutions in additive manufacturing process using deep learning, 2022, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing
  • Sensitivity Analysis in the Modelling of a High Speed Steel Thin-Wall Produced by Directed Energy Deposition, 2020, Metals

Their research collaborations frequently involve co-authors such as:

  • Laurent Duchêne
  • Víctor Tuninetti
  • Anne Mertens
  • Hoang Son Tran
  • Seifallah Fetni

Best Publications

  • Process window enhancement for single point incremental forming through multi-step toolpaths

    J. R. Duflou;J. Verbert;B. Belkassem;J. Gu

  • Single point incremental forming: state-of-the-art and prospects

    Joost R. Duflou;Anne Marie Habraken;Jian Cao;Rajiv Malhotra

  • Influence of Si precipitates on fracture mechanisms of AlSi10Mg parts processed by Selective Laser Melting

    J. Delahaye;J. Tchoufang Tchuindjang;J. Lecomte-Beckers;O. Rigo

  • Forming forces in single point incremental forming: prediction by finite element simulations, validation and sensitivity

    C. Henrard;C. Bouffioux;P. Eyckens;H. Sol

  • Anisotropy and tension–compression asymmetry modeling of the room temperature plastic response of Ti–6Al–4V

    V. Tuninetti;G. Gilles;O. Milis;Thomas Pardoen

  • Strain evolution in the single point incremental forming process: digital image correlation measurement and finite element prediction

    Philip Eyckens;Bachir Belkassem;Christophe Henrard;Jun Gu

  • Model Identification and FE Simulations Effect of Different Yield Loci and Hardening Laws in Sheet Forming

    Paulo Flores;Laurent Duchene;Chantal Bouffioux;T. Lelotte

  • An automatic remeshing technique for finite element simulation of forming processes

    Anne Habraken;Serge Cescotto

  • Contact between deformable solids: The fully coupled approach

    A. M. Habraken;S. Cescotto

  • Multiaxial fatigue damage modelling at macro scale of Ti–6Al–4V alloy

    Abdeljalil Marmi;Anne Habraken;Anne Habraken;Laurent Duchene;Laurent Duchene

  • Modelling the plastic anisotropy of metals

    Anne Habraken

  • Experimental characterization and elasto-plastic modeling of the quasi-static mechanical response of TA-6 V at room temperature

    G. Gilles;W. Hammami;V. Libertiaux;O. Cazacu

  • Anisotropic elasto-plastic finite element analysis using a stress-strain interpolation method based on a polycrystalline model

    Anne Marie Habraken;Laurent Duchêne

  • 3D thermal finite element analysis of laser cladding processed Ti-6Al-4V part with microstructural correlations

    Hoang Son Tran;Jérôme Tchoufack Tchuindjang;Hakan Paydas;Anne Mertens

  • A fully coupled elastoplastic damage modeling and fracture criteria in metalforming processes

    Y. Y. Zhu;Serge Cescotto;Anne Habraken

  • Multi-step toolpath approach to overcome forming limitations in single point incremental forming

    Johan Verbert;Bachir Belkassem;Christophe Henrard;A.m. Habraken

  • Finite element analysis of the free surface effects on the mechanical behavior of thin nickel polycrystals

    Clément Keller;eric Hug;Anne Habraken;Laurent Duchene

  • Analysis of speckle patterns for deformation measurements by digital image correlation

    D. Lecompte;H. Sol;J. Vantomme;A. Habraken

  • Study of the geometrical inaccuracy on a SPIF two-slope pyramid by finite element simulations

    Carlos Felipe Guzmán;Carlos Felipe Guzmán;Jun Gu;Joost Duflou;Hans Vanhove

  • Analysis of ESAFORM 2021 cup drawing benchmark of an Al alloy, critical factors for accuracy and efficiency of FE simulations

    Unknown

  • Interests and limitations of nanoindentation for bulk multiphase material identification: Application to the β phase of Ti-5553

    A. F. Gerday;M. Ben Bettaieb;L. Duchene;Nicolas Clément

  • Length changes and texture prediction during free end torsion test of copper bars with FEM and remeshing techniques

    Laurent Duchêne;Fouad El Houdaigui;Anne Marie Habraken

Frequent Co-Authors

Joost Duflou
Joost Duflou KU Leuven
Thomas Pardoen
Thomas Pardoen Université Catholique de Louvain
Pascal Jacques
Pascal Jacques Université Catholique de Louvain
Olivier Bouaziz
Olivier Bouaziz University of Lorraine
P. Van Houtte
P. Van Houtte KU Leuven
Oana Cazacu
Oana Cazacu University of Florida
W. Van Paepegem
W. Van Paepegem Ghent University
Joris Degrieck
Joris Degrieck Ghent University
Eric Maire
Eric Maire Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon
Stefania Bruschi
Stefania Bruschi University of Padua

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring fields related to Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering can broaden your career options significantly. For instance, those interested in human health and communication may consider accredited easiest counseling degree programs, which provide a foundation in helping professions that complement engineering roles in healthcare technology.

For students seeking accelerated learning options, programs like the best 5 year speech pathology programs offer streamlined paths to specialist careers in communication disorders, often utilizing online formats for increased flexibility.

Another unique career avenue is becoming an FBI profiler, which blends analytical skills with behavioral science. The education, salary, and job outlook for a profiler are detailed in profiler job resources, guiding those interested in law enforcement and forensic analysis.

If you want to understand your options better, exploring different types of counseling degrees can help identify paths that fit your interests, whether online or campus-based. This knowledge can complement engineering expertise with skills in psychology and human behavior, valuable in multidisciplinary teams.

Best Scientists Citing Anne Habraken

Trending Scientists