What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Astronomy
- Astrophysics
- Supernova
His scientific interests lie mostly in Astrophysics, Supernova, Astronomy, Galaxy and Redshift.
His Astrophysics study frequently links to other fields, such as Spectral line.
His studies deal with areas such as Dark energy, Baryon acoustic oscillations, Emission spectrum and Photometry as well as Supernova.
The concepts of his Galaxy study are interwoven with issues in Spectroscopy and Magnetar.
The study of Redshift is intertwined with the study of Star formation in a number of ways.
The Gamma-ray burst study combines topics in areas such as Spectral energy distribution and Very Large Telescope.
His most cited work include:
- Cosmological Results from High-z Supernovae* ** (1491 citations)
- Improved cosmological constraints from a joint analysis of the SDSS-II and SNLS supernova samples (1435 citations)
- A very energetic supernova associated with the γ-ray burst of 29 March 2003 (1153 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His primary areas of investigation include Astrophysics, Supernova, Astronomy, Light curve and Galaxy.
Many of his studies on Astrophysics involve topics that are commonly interrelated, such as Spectral line.
His work carried out in the field of Supernova brings together such families of science as Stars, Photometry, Spectroscopy and Emission spectrum.
His research in Light curve intersects with topics in Type II supernova, Magnetar, Brightness, Absolute magnitude and Radioactive decay.
The various areas that he examines in his Redshift study include Cosmology, Dark energy and Sky.
Jesper Sollerman interconnects Spectral energy distribution and Very Large Telescope in the investigation of issues within Gamma-ray burst.
He most often published in these fields:
- Astrophysics (106.11%)
- Supernova (81.66%)
- Astronomy (45.80%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2019-2021)?
- Astrophysics (106.11%)
- Supernova (81.66%)
- Light curve (34.72%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His main research concerns Astrophysics, Supernova, Light curve, Spectral line and Ejecta.
He works mostly in the field of Astrophysics, limiting it down to topics relating to Emission spectrum and, in certain cases, Spectroscopy.
His work deals with themes such as Stars, White dwarf and Redshift, which intersect with Supernova.
His Light curve research includes themes of Gamma-ray burst, Accretion, Brightness and Absolute magnitude.
His study on Ejecta also encompasses disciplines like
- Magnetar that connect with fields like Helium,
- Luminous blue variable together with Spiral galaxy.
His research integrates issues of Balmer series and Sky in his study of Galaxy.
Between 2019 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Seventeen Tidal Disruption Events from the First Half of ZTF Survey Observations: Entering a New Era of Population Studies (58 citations)
- GROWTH on S190814bv: Deep Synoptic Limits on the Optical/Near-infrared Counterpart to a Neutron Star–Black Hole Merger (45 citations)
- Observational constraints on the optical and near-infrared emission from the neutron star-black hole binary merger S190814bv (30 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Astronomy
- Astrophysics
- Galaxy
Astrophysics, Supernova, Light curve, Galaxy and Spectral line are his primary areas of study.
His Luminosity, Neutron star, Ejecta, Gravitational wave and Photometry study are his primary interests in Astrophysics.
His Supernova research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Brightness, White dwarf and Shock wave.
His research investigates the link between Light curve and topics such as Absolute magnitude that cross with problems in Blanketing.
The study of Galaxy is intertwined with the study of Energy flux in a number of ways.
His work carried out in the field of Redshift brings together such families of science as Universe and Sky.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
