World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
35
Citations
7423
World Ranking
8887
National Ranking
2472

Oana Cazacu publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Oana Cazacu sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 244 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Oana Cazacu D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Oana Cazacu sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Oana Cazacu is affiliated with the University of Florida in the United States. Their research primarily addresses areas within engineering and materials science, with a particular focus on mechanical engineering, mechanics of materials, and materials chemistry.

The scientist's work frequently appears in several publication venues, which include:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • International Journal of Material Forming
  • European Journal of Mechanics - A/Solids
  • Mechanics Research Communications
  • Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids

Oana Cazacu's recent papers cover specific topics related to material behavior, plasticity, and deformation. Notable publications include:

  • Advances in anisotropy of plastic behaviour and formability of sheet metals, 2020, International Journal of Material Forming
  • Analysis of ESAFORM 2021 cup drawing benchmark of an Al alloy, critical factors for accuracy and efficiency of FE simulations, 2022, International Journal of Material Forming
  • The effect of tension-compression asymmetry on the formation of dynamic necking instabilities under plane strain stretching, 2020, International Journal of Plasticity
  • Room-temperature plastic behavior and formability of a commercially pure titanium: Mechanical characterization, modeling, and validation, 2021, International Journal of Solids and Structures
  • Modeling the effect of notch geometry on the deformation of a strongly anisotropic aluminum alloy, 2020, European Journal of Mechanics - A/Solids

Their frequent coauthors include Benoit Revil-Baudard, Nitin Chandola, Luca Corallo, F. Barlat, and Toshihiko Kuwabara.

Research topics addressed encompass:

  • Metal Forming Simulation Techniques
  • Metallurgy and Material Forming
  • High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior
  • Microstructure and mechanical properties
  • Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
  • Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
  • Manufacturing Process and Optimization

The scientist has contributed extensively to understanding the mechanical and structural aspects of materials, including the behavior and formability of sheet metals and alloys under various conditions. Their work integrates experimental characterization with computational modeling approaches.

Best Publications

  • Orthotropic yield criterion for hexagonal closed packed metals

    Oana Cazacu;Brian Plunkett;Frédéric Barlat

  • A criterion for description of anisotropy and yield differential effects in pressure-insensitive metals

    Oana Cazacu;Frédéric Barlat

  • Plane stress yield function for aluminum alloy sheets

    F. Barlat;J. W. Yoon;J. C. Brem;O. Cazacu

  • Generalization of Drucker's Yield Criterion to Orthotropy

    Oana Cazacu;Frédéric Barlat

  • Orthotropic yield criteria for description of the anisotropy in tension and compression of sheet metals

    Brian Plunkett;Oana Cazacu;Frederic Barlat

  • Anisotropic response of high-purity α-titanium: Experimental characterization and constitutive modeling

    Michael E. Nixon;Oana Cazacu;Ricardo A. Lebensohn

  • Advances in anisotropy and formability

    Dorel Banabic;Frédéric Barlat;Oana Cazacu;Toshihiko Kuwabara

  • On linear transformations of stress tensors for the description of plastic anisotropy

    Frédéric Barlat;Jeong Whan Yoon;Oana Cazacu

  • Macroscopic yield criteria for plastic anisotropic materials containing spheroidal voids

    Vincent Monchiet;Oana Cazacu;Eric Charkaluk;Djimedo Kondo

  • Anisotropic yield function of hexagonal materials taking into account texture development and anisotropic hardening

    B. Plunkett;R.A. Lebensohn;O. Cazacu;F. Barlat

  • Application of the theory of representation to describe yielding of anisotropic aluminum alloys

    Oana Cazacu;Frédéric Barlat

  • Modeling bending of α-titanium with embedded polycrystal plasticity in implicit finite elements

    Marko Knezevic;Ricardo A. Lebensohn;Oana Cazacu;Benoit Revil-Baudard

  • On the use of homogeneous polynomials to develop anisotropic yield functions with applications to sheet forming

    Stefan Soare;Jeong Whan Yoon;Oana Cazacu

  • Elastic-viscoplastic anisotropic modeling of textured metals and validation using the Taylor cylinder impact test

    B. Plunkett;O. Cazacu;R.A. Lebensohn;F. Barlat

  • Advances in anisotropy of plastic behaviour and formability of sheet metals

    Dorel Banabic;Frédéric Barlat;Oana Cazacu;Toshihiko Kuwabara

  • Earing predictions for strongly textured aluminum sheets

    Jong-Hun Yoon;Oana Cazacu;Jeong Whan Yoon;Robert E. Dick

  • Experimental characterization and elasto-plastic modeling of the quasi-static mechanical response of TA-6 V at room temperature

    G. Gilles;W. Hammami;V. Libertiaux;O. Cazacu

  • Analytic plastic potential for porous aggregates with matrix exhibiting tension-compression asymmetry

    Oana Cazacu;Joel B. Stewart

  • New yield criteria for isotropic and textured metallic materials

    Oana Cazacu

  • Analytical yield criterion for an anisotropic material containing spherical voids and exhibiting tension–compression asymmetry

    Joel B Stewart;Oana Cazacu

  • Constitutive modeling of AZ31 sheet alloy with application to axial crushing

    Jonghun Yoon;Oana Cazacu;Raja K. Mishra

  • Orthotropic strain rate potential for the description of anisotropy in tension and compression of metals

    Oana Cazacu;Ioan. R. Ionescu;Jeong Whan Yoon

Frequent Co-Authors

Frédéric Barlat
Frédéric Barlat Pohang University of Science and Technology
Jeong Whan Yoon
Jeong Whan Yoon Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
Ricardo A. Lebensohn
Ricardo A. Lebensohn Los Alamos National Laboratory
Raja K. Mishra
Raja K. Mishra General Motors (United States)
Dorel Banabic
Dorel Banabic Technical University of Cluj-Napoca
Anne Habraken
Anne Habraken University of Liège
Toshihiko Kuwabara
Toshihiko Kuwabara Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology
Djimedo Kondo
Djimedo Kondo Sorbonne University
Jian-Fu Shao
Jian-Fu Shao University of Lille
Marko Knezevic
Marko Knezevic University of New Hampshire

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Engineering and Technology students who want to expand their skills or diversify their career prospects can consider several related online degree options. As the job market evolves, interdisciplinary skills provide an advantage across industries.

For those keen on the digital world, a social media marketing degree online helps bridge technology expertise with marketing strategies—essential for tech-driven business roles. Hospitality professionals can boost their credentials through an online hospitality management degree, gaining leadership skills that are valuable in technology-enabled hospitality sectors.

Engineering graduates aiming for management positions may consider the cheapest online aacsb mba programs, which deliver business acumen and leadership credentials online. Additionally, for those interested in legal compliance, intellectual property, or patent law, a paralegal certificate online aba-approved can be a strategic pathway.

Exploring these online degrees opens up new opportunities and helps engineering and technology graduates stay versatile in the rapidly changing job landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Oana Cazacu

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles