World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
33
Citations
5511
World Ranking
2980
National Ranking
4

Dorel Banabic publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dorel Banabic sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 154 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Dorel Banabic D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dorel Banabic sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Sheet Metal Forming Processes: Constitutive Modelling and Numerical Simulation

    Unknown

  • An improved analytical description of orthotropy in metallic sheets

    Unknown

  • Formability of Metallic Materials

    Unknown

  • Sheet Metal Forming Processes

    Unknown

  • Testing and modelling of material behaviour and formability in sheet metal forming

    S. Bruschi;T. Altan;D. Banabic;P.F. Bariani

  • Advances in anisotropy and formability

    Dorel Banabic;Frédéric Barlat;Oana Cazacu;Toshihiko Kuwabara

  • Non-quadratic yield criterion for orthotropic sheet metals under plane-stress conditions

    Unknown

  • Numerical determination of the forming limit curves of anisotropic sheet metals using GTN damage model

    Unknown

  • Formability of metallic materials : plastic anisotropy, formability testing, forming limits

    Unknown

  • Advances in anisotropy of plastic behaviour and formability of sheet metals

    Dorel Banabic;Frédéric Barlat;Oana Cazacu;Toshihiko Kuwabara

  • An evolving plane stress yield criterion based on crystal plasticity virtual experiments

    Jerzy Gawad;Jerzy Gawad;Dorel Banabic;Albert Van Bael;Dan Sorin Comsa

  • Development of a new procedure for the experimental determination of the Forming Limit Curves

    Unknown

  • Modelling of the Forming Limit Band –A new Method to Increase the Robustness in the Simulation of Sheet Metal Forming Processes

    Unknown

  • Prediction of the influence of yield locus on the limit strains in sheet metals

    Unknown

  • Application of various FLD modelling approaches

    Unknown

  • A NEW YIELD CRITERION FOR ORTHOTROPIC SHEET METALS UNDER PLANE-STRESS CONDITIONS

    Unknown

  • The performance of Yld96 and BBC2000 yield functions in forming limit prediction

    M.C. Butuc;D. Banabic;A. Barata da Rocha;J.J. Gracio

  • Closed-form solution for bulging through elliptical dies

    Unknown

  • FLD theoretical model using a new anisotropic yield criterion

    Unknown

  • Advanced Methods in Material Forming

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Toshihiko Kuwabara
Toshihiko Kuwabara Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology
Oana Cazacu
Oana Cazacu University of Florida
Frédéric Barlat
Frédéric Barlat Pohang University of Science and Technology
Dirk Roose
Dirk Roose KU Leuven
Marion Merklein
Marion Merklein University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Richard Dashwood
Richard Dashwood Coventry University
Andrea Ghiotti
Andrea Ghiotti University of Padua
Jian Cao
Jian Cao Northwestern University
P. Van Houtte
P. Van Houtte KU Leuven
José Grácio
José Grácio University of Aveiro

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students pursuing Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in the USA, exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities. For example, combining technical knowledge with specialized fields such as speech therapy might be appealing. Programs like 5 year speech pathology programs offer accelerated paths for those interested in healthcare applications of engineering principles.

Additionally, engineering graduates who are interested in behavioral science can consider career options like joining the FBI’s Behavioral Analysis Unit. Understanding how technical skills intersect with criminology could be an exciting pathway. Learn more about this field through resources like fbi behavioral analysis unit.

For those considering careers in counseling, knowing the different requirements and specializations is crucial. The guide on types of counseling degrees helps prospective students find programs that match their interests and professional goals.

Moreover, those who want to balance rigorous academic pursuits in engineering with flexible study options may explore accredited easiest counseling degree programs, which offer accessible pathways into counseling careers without compromising quality education.

Best Scientists Citing Dorel Banabic

Recently Published Articles