World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 35 2749 2580 74 73 132 3389

Sushanta Kumar Panda publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Sushanta Kumar Panda between 1980 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Sushanta Kumar Panda published across 47 years, from 1980 to 2026, averaging 3.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2023. 10 of the 164 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2023. 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 3 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 22 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 7 publications 2026: 3 publications
1980 2026

164 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Sushanta Kumar Panda: publications per year, 1980 to 2026
Year Publications
1980 1
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 0
2004 0
2005 0
2006 1
2007 3
2008 6
2009 8
2010 7
2011 2
2012 2
2013 5
2014 7
2015 11
2016 6
2017 10
2018 12
2019 12
2020 7
2021 8
2022 10
2023 22
2024 14
2025 7
2026 3
Total 164
Download as CSV

Sushanta Kumar Panda publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sushanta Kumar Panda sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 127–136 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 132 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130 132
137–146 140
147–156 155
157–166 132
167–176 133
177–186 130
187–196 140
197–206 115
207–216 125
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

Sushanta Kumar Panda D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sushanta Kumar Panda sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144
33 153
34 189
35 158 35
36 139
37 127
38 130
39 126
40 104
41 100
42 107
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • Nanoindentation and microstructure analysis of resistance spot welded dual phase steel

    V.H. Baltazar Hernandez;V.H. Baltazar Hernandez;S.K. Panda;S.K. Panda;M.L. Kuntz;Y. Zhou

  • Characterization of tensile properties of tailor welded IF steel sheets and their formability in stretch forming

    Sushanta Kumar Panda;D. Ravi Kumar;Harish Kumar;A.K. Nath

  • A study on heat affected zone softening in resistance spot welded dual phase steel by nanoindentation

    Victor Hugo Baltazar Hernandez;Victor Hugo Baltazar Hernandez;Sushanta Kumar Panda;Yasuaki Okita;Norman Y. Zhou

  • Mechanical properties, springback, and formability of W-temper and peak aged 7075 aluminum alloy sheets: Experiments and modeling

    Yumi Choi;Jinwoo Lee;Sudhy S. Panicker;Hong-Kyo Jin

  • Numerical Simulations and Experimental Results of Tensile Test Behavior of Laser Butt Welded DP980 Steels

    S. K. Panda;N. Sreenivasan;M. L. Kuntz;Y. Zhou

  • Microstructure and Mechanical Performance of Friction Stir Spot-Welded Aluminum-5754 Sheets

    Unknown

  • Influence of out-of-plane stretch forming induced different strain paths on micro-texture evolution, slip system activity and Taylor factor distribution in Al–Li alloy

    Rahul Rakshit;Arnab Sarkar;Sushanta Kumar Panda;Sumantra Mandal

  • Effects of weld line position and geometry on the formability of laser welded high strength low alloy and dual-phase steel blanks

    J. Li;S.S. Nayak;E. Biro;S.K. Panda

  • Formability Analysis of Diode-Laser-Welded Tailored Blanks of Advanced High-Strength Steel Sheets

    S.K. Panda;V.H. Baltazar Hernandez;M.L. Kuntz;Y. Zhou

  • Failure strains of anisotropic thin sheet metals: Experimental evaluation and theoretical prediction

    Unknown

  • Multi Objective Optimization of Friction Stir Welding Parameters for Joining of Two Dissimilar Thin Aluminum Sheets

    R.K. Kesharwani;S.K. Panda;S.K. Pal

  • A comprehensive study on force, temperature, mechanical properties and micro-structural characterizations in friction stir lap welding of dissimilar materials (AA6061-T6 & AISI304)

    Raju Prasad Mahto;Ravi Kumar;Surjya K Pal;Sushanta K Panda

  • Effects of Welding Parameters on the Mechanical Performance of Laser Welded Nitinol

    M. I. Khan;S. K. Panda;Y. Zhou

  • Limiting drawing ratio and deep drawing behavior of dual phase steel tailor welded blanks: FE simulation and experimental validation

    Unknown

  • Necking and fracture limit analyses of different pre-strained sheet materials in polar effective plastic strain locus using Yld2000-2d yield model

    Unknown

  • Improvement in formability of tailor welded blanks by application of counter pressure in biaxial stretch forming

    Unknown

  • Use of uncoupled ductile damage models for fracture forming limit prediction during two-stage forming of aluminum sheet material

    Unknown

  • Formability and fracture in deep drawing sheet metals: Extended studies for pre-strained anisotropic thin sheets

    Shamik Basak;Sushanta Kumar Panda;Myoung-Gyu Lee

  • Microstructures, Forming Limit and Failure Analyses of Inconel 718 Sheets for Fabrication of Aerospace Components

    Unknown

  • Parameter optimization and texture evolution in single point incremental sheet forming process

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Y. Zhou
Y. Zhou University of Waterloo
Surjya K. Pal
Surjya K. Pal Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur
Myoung-Gyu Lee
Myoung-Gyu Lee Seoul National University
Richard Dashwood
Richard Dashwood Coventry University
Sumantra Mandal
Sumantra Mandal Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur
Chandra Sekhar Tiwary
Chandra Sekhar Tiwary Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur
Dilip Kumar Pratihar
Dilip Kumar Pratihar Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur
Sachin Kumar
Sachin Kumar University of Delhi
Suman Chakraborty
Suman Chakraborty Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur
Adrian P. Gerlich
Adrian P. Gerlich University of Waterloo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering degree opens many doors, but students often explore related fields that complement their skills. For example, understanding the speech pathology online program cost can be useful for those interested in bioengineering applications related to human-machine interfaces or communication technologies.

Veterans looking to transition into engineering or technical roles may find flexible study options crucial. Exploring online speech pathology degree programs for veterans highlights how tailored education pathways support career changes with veteran-specific benefits and resources.

For ambitious students, accelerated programs like the 5 year accelerated speech pathology programs demonstrate how combining efficiency with rigorous study can fast-track entry into specialized fields, a model applicable to some engineering disciplines as well.

Additionally, interdisciplinary career paths, such as working with the FBI Behavioral Analysis Unit, blend technical knowledge with behavioral insights. Learning more about fbi behavioral analysis unit careers can inspire engineers to consider alternative roles where analytical and problem-solving skills are highly valued.

Best Scientists Citing Sushanta Kumar Panda

Recently Published Articles