World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Engineering and Technology
Portugal
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Materials Science 62 6457 6242 28 28 344 14232
Engineering and Technology 62 1911 1820 9 9 349 13693

José Grácio publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by José Grácio between 1987 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. José Grácio published across 35 years, from 1987 to 2021, averaging 10.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 41 publications in 2010. 1 of the 356 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 41. Peak 41 publications in 2010. 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 2 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 2 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 11 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 14 publications 2003: 18 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 23 publications 2006: 33 publications 2007: 19 publications 2008: 26 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 41 publications 2011: 30 publications 2012: 27 publications 2013: 23 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 1 publication
1987 2021

356 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
José Grácio: publications per year, 1987 to 2021
Year Publications
1987 1
1988 0
1989 1
1990 1
1991 1
1992 0
1993 1
1994 2
1995 1
1996 1
1997 2
1998 5
1999 11
2000 9
2001 3
2002 14
2003 18
2004 11
2005 23
2006 33
2007 19
2008 26
2009 15
2010 41
2011 30
2012 27
2013 23
2014 16
2015 13
2016 6
2017 0
2018 1
2019 0
2020 0
2021 1
Total 356
Download as CSV

José Grácio publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where José Grácio sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 348–357 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 349 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131 349
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

José Grácio D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where José Grácio sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 62 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138 62
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Engineering and Technology in Portugal Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Engineering and Technology in Portugal Leader Award

Overview

José Grácio is affiliated with the University of Aveiro in Portugal. Their academic profile is primarily associated with this institution, indicating an ongoing role in research and education within that academic environment.

There are no specific recent papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, book publications, or detailed fields of study listed for José Grácio. Consequently, the overview of their research topics, collaborative network, and publication record cannot be elaborated upon based on the provided data.

This profile reflects the available information without extrapolation or additional assumptions about their scientific contributions or career history.

Best Publications

  • Surface Modification of Graphene Nanosheets with Gold Nanoparticles: The Role of Oxygen Moieties at Graphene Surface on Gold Nucleation and Growth

    Gil Goncalves;Paula A. A. P. Marques;Carlos M. Granadeiro;Helena I. S. Nogueira

  • Dopamine—Melanin Film Deposition Depends on the Used Oxidant and Buffer Solution

    Falk Bernsmann;Vincent Ball;Frédéric Addiego;Arnaud Ponche

  • Graphene oxide modified with PMMA via ATRP as a reinforcement filler

    Gil Gonçalves;Paula A. A. P. Marques;Ana Barros-Timmons;Igor Bdkin

  • Amine-Modified Graphene: Thrombo-Protective Safer Alternative to Graphene Oxide for Biomedical Applications

    Sunil K. Singh;Manoj K. Singh;Paresh P. Kulkarni;Vijay K. Sonkar

  • An alternative to kinematic hardening in classical plasticity

    Frédéric Barlat;Frédéric Barlat;José J. Gracio;Myoung-Gyu Lee;Edgar F. Rauch

  • Diamond growth by chemical vapour deposition

    J J Gracio;Q H Fan;J C Madaleno

  • Strain rate sensitivity of the commercial aluminum alloy AA5182-O

    R.C. Picu;G. Vincze;F. Ozturk;J.J. Gracio

  • Thrombus inducing property of atomically thin graphene oxide sheets.

    Sunil K. Singh;Manoj K. Singh;Manasa K. Nayak;Sharda Kumari

  • EXTENSION OF HOMOGENEOUS ANISOTROPIC HARDENING MODEL TO CROSS-LOADING WITH LATENT EFFECTS

    Frédéric Barlat;Frédéric Barlat;Jinjin Ha;José J. Grácio;Myoung-Gyu Lee

  • Nano-graphene oxide: a potential multifunctional platform for cancer therapy.

    Gil Gonçalves;Mercedes Vila;María-Teresa Portolés;María Vallet-Regi

  • A new one‐point quadrature enhanced assumed strain (EAS) solid‐shell element with multiple integration points along thickness—part II: nonlinear applications

    Ricardo J. Alves de Sousa;Rui P. R. Cardoso;Robertt A. Fontes Valente;Jeong-Whan Yoon;Jeong-Whan Yoon

  • Large-area high-throughput synthesis of monolayer graphene sheet by Hot Filament Thermal Chemical Vapor Deposition

    Ranjit Hawaldar;P. Merino;M. R. Correia;Igor Bdikin

  • Plastic flow for non-monotonic loading conditions of an aluminum alloy sheet sample

    F. Barlat;F. Barlat;J.M. Ferreira Duarte;J.J. Gracio;A.B. Lopes

  • A theoretical study on forming limit diagrams prediction

    M.C. Butuc;M.C. Butuc;J.J. Gracio;A. Barata da Rocha

  • Enhanced Thermal Conductivity and Viscosity of Nanodiamond-Nickel Nanocomposite Nanofluids

    L. Syam Sundar;Manoj K. Singh;E. Venkata Ramana;Budhendra Singh

  • Enhancements of homogenous anisotropic hardening model and application to mild and dual-phase steels

    F. Barlat;F. Barlat;G. Vincze;J.J. Grácio;M.-G. Lee

  • Effect of texture and microstructure on strain hardening anisotropy for aluminum deformed in uniaxial tension and simple shear

    A.B. Lopes;F. Barlat;F. Barlat;J.J. Gracio;J.F. Ferreira Duarte

  • Self-Assembly of Tetramers of 5,6-Dihydroxyindole Explains the Primary Physical Properties of Eumelanin: Experiment, Simulation, and Design

    Chun-Teh Chen;Vincent Ball;José Joaquim de Almeida Gracio;Manoj Kumar Singh

  • A crystallographic dislocation model for describing hardening of polycrystals during strain path changes. Application to low carbon steels

    K. Kitayama;C.N. Tomé;E.F. Rauch;J.J. Gracio

  • Work-hardening model for polycrystalline metals under strain reversal at large strains

    E.F. Rauch;J.J. Gracio;F. Barlat;F. Barlat

  • Deposition Mechanism and Properties of Thin Polydopamine Films for High Added Value Applications in Surface Science at the Nanoscale

    Vincent Ball;Doriane Del Frari;Marc Michel;Markus J. Buehler

  • Artificial aging and shear deformation behaviour of 6022 aluminium alloy

    J.J. Gracio;F. Barlat;F. Barlat;E.F. Rauch;P.T. Jones

Frequent Co-Authors

Frédéric Barlat
Frédéric Barlat Pohang University of Science and Technology
Jeong Whan Yoon
Jeong Whan Yoon Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
Said Ahzi
Said Ahzi University of Strasbourg
Igor Bdikin
Igor Bdikin University of Aveiro
Andrei L. Kholkin
Andrei L. Kholkin University of Latvia
Antonio C.M. Sousa
Antonio C.M. Sousa University of Aveiro
Renato Natal Jorge
Renato Natal Jorge University of Porto
Carlos N. Tomé
Carlos N. Tomé Los Alamos National Laboratory
Jorge R. Frade
Jorge R. Frade University of Aveiro

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As Engineering and Technology continue to drive innovation, students and professionals are increasingly blending technical expertise with business, leadership, and managerial skills. Pursuing an online ba business administration can build fundamental knowledge in management, finance, and strategy—skills highly valued in tech-driven workplaces.

For those eager to move into leadership or executive roles, a masters organizational leadership online degree is ideal. This program helps students develop abilities in team management, digital collaboration, and strategic thinking—essential for leading engineering and technology teams.

Operations management is another vital area that intersects with technology. An mba in operations management equips professionals to streamline production, improve efficiency, and manage supply chains in technology-rich environments.

For those concerned about standardized test requirements, pursuing an online mba without gmat is now possible, making quality education more accessible while advancing your career in engineering, technology, or business sectors.

Best Scientists Citing José Grácio

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles