World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 65 2437 2361 1222 1177 325 19061

Luis Ceze publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Luis Ceze between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Luis Ceze published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 46.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 859 publications in 2020. 5 of the 1,217 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
200 400 600 800
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 859. Peak 859 publications in 2020. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 94 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 21 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 30 publications 2018: 30 publications 2019: 19 publications 2020: 859 publications 2021: 22 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 2 publications
2000 2025

1,217 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Luis Ceze: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 0
2002 5
2003 6
2004 2
2005 3
2006 6
2007 5
2008 9
2009 10
2010 12
2011 94
2012 15
2013 16
2014 21
2015 16
2016 18
2017 30
2018 30
2019 19
2020 859
2021 22
2022 8
2023 5
2024 3
2025 2
Total 1,217
Download as CSV

Luis Ceze publications per year - data summary

  • Luis Ceze, a Computer Science scholar from University of Washington, has 1,217 publications recorded across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 2000 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2020, with 859 publications.
  • The least productive year with any output is 2000, with 1 publication.
  • 1 of the 26 years in the span carries no publications at all (2001).
  • The rate of publication averages 46.8 papers per year over the whole span, or 48.7 per year counting only the 25 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 40 publications, 3% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 2000-2008: 37 publications (4.1 per year); 2009-2017: 232 publications (25.8 per year); 2018-2025: 948 publications (118.5 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Luis Ceze publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Luis Ceze sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 322–331 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 325 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206 325
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Luis Ceze publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 14,188 Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 97 ranges running from 32–41 to 991+ publications.
  • Luis Ceze, a Computer Science scholar from University of Washington, records 325 publications - the 78th percentile of the discipline.
  • 78% of ranked Computer Science scientists score the same or lower than Luis Ceze, and about 22% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 202–211 publications range, and Luis Ceze ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 142–151 publications, holding 609 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 272–281 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 991 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Luis Ceze D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Luis Ceze sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 64–65 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292 65
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Luis Ceze D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 14,188 Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 52 ranges running from 30–31 to 131+ D-Index.
  • Luis Ceze, a Computer Science scholar from University of Washington, records 65 D-Index - the 83rd percentile of the discipline.
  • 83% of ranked Computer Science scientists score the same or lower than Luis Ceze, and about 17% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 44–45 D-Index range, and Luis Ceze ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 36–37 D-Index, holding 990 scientists (7% of the field).
  • 71% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 54–55 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2017 - ACM Senior Member
  • 2010 - Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

Overview

Luis Ceze is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States. Their research spans multiple scientific domains, with a notable focus on molecular biology and computational applications involving DNA.

The scientist has published several recent papers, demonstrating active engagement in the interdisciplinary field of DNA data storage and molecular computing. Some of their recent papers include:

  • Probing the physical limits of reliable DNA data retrieval, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Synthetic DNA applications in information technology, 2022, Nature Communications
  • Quantifying molecular bias in DNA data storage, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Scaling DNA data storage with nanoscale electrode wells, 2021, Science Advances
  • Molecular-level similarity search brings computing to DNA data storage, 2021, Nature Communications

Their frequent co-authors reflect extensive collaboration within their research community. Prominent colleagues include Karin Strauß, Jeff Nivala, Karen Zhang, Kathryn J Doroschak, and Melissa Queen.

Luis Ceze's publications appear most often in venues such as Harvard Dataverse, arXiv (Cornell University), Nature Communications, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), and Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research).

They work across several subfields including:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Social Psychology
  • Paleontology
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Artificial Intelligence

Their research topics include:

  • Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
  • Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • DNA and Biological Computing
  • Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
  • Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence
  • Advanced Neural Network Applications

Throughout their career, Luis Ceze has received recognitions such as becoming an ACM Senior Member in 2017 and being named a Fellow of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation in 2010.

Best Publications

  • TVM: an automated end-to-end optimizing compiler for deep learning

    Tianqi Chen;Thierry Moreau;Ziheng Jiang;Lianmin Zheng

  • EnerJ: approximate data types for safe and general low-power computation

    Adrian Sampson;Werner Dietl;Emily Fortuna;Danushen Gnanapragasam

  • Neural acceleration for general-purpose approximate programs

    Hadi Esmaeilzadeh;Adrian Sampson;Luis Ceze;Doug Burger

  • Neural Acceleration for General-Purpose Approximate Programs

    Hadi Esmaeilzadeh;Adrian Sampson;Luis Ceze;Doug Burger

  • Random access in large-scale DNA data storage

    Lee Organick;Siena Dumas Ang;Yuan Jyue Chen;Randolph Lopez

  • An Overview of the BlueGene/L Supercomputer

    N.R. Adiga;G. Almasi;G.S. Almasi;Y. Aridor

  • Approximate Storage in Solid-State Memories

    Adrian Sampson;Jacob Nelson;Karin Strauss;Luis Ceze

  • Architecture support for disciplined approximate programming

    Hadi Esmaeilzadeh;Adrian Sampson;Luis Ceze;Doug Burger

  • Molecular digital data storage using DNA

    Luis Ceze;Jeff Nivala;Karin Strauss;Karin Strauss

  • Bulk Disambiguation of Speculative Threads in Multiprocessors

    Luis Ceze;James Tuck;Josep Torrellas;Calin Cascaval

  • DMP: Deterministic Shared-Memory Multiprocessing

    J. Devietti;B. Lucia;L. Ceze;M. Oskin

  • A DNA-Based Archival Storage System

    James Bornholt;Randolph Lopez;Douglas Carmean;Luis Ceze

  • A DNA-Based Archival Storage System

    James Bornholt;Randolph Lopez;Douglas M. Carmean;Luis Ceze

  • DMP: deterministic shared memory multiprocessing

    Joseph Devietti;Brandon Lucia;Luis Ceze;Mark Oskin

  • EnerJ

    Unknown

  • CoreDet: a compiler and runtime system for deterministic multithreaded execution

    Tom Bergan;Owen Anderson;Joseph Devietti;Luis Ceze

  • POSH: a TLS compiler that exploits program structure

    Wei Liu;James Tuck;Luis Ceze;Wonsun Ahn

  • BulkSC: bulk enforcement of sequential consistency

    Luis Ceze;James Tuck;Pablo Montesinos;Josep Torrellas

  • DeLorean: Recording and Deterministically Replaying Shared-Memory Multiprocessor Execution Ef?ciently

    Pablo Montesinos;Luis Ceze;Josep Torrellas

  • Latency-tolerant software distributed shared memory

    Jacob Nelson;Brandon Holt;Brandon Myers;Preston Briggs

  • General-purpose code acceleration with limited-precision analog computation

    Renée St. Amant;Amir Yazdanbakhsh;Jongse Park;Bradley Thwaites

  • Learning to Optimize Tensor Programs

    Tianqi Chen;Lianmin Zheng;Eddie Q. Yan;Ziheng Jiang

  • Deterministic process groups in dOS

    Tom Bergan;Nicholas Hunt;Luis Ceze;Steven D. Gribble

  • Operating system implications of fast, cheap, non-volatile memory

    Katelin Bailey;Luis Ceze;Steven D. Gribble;Henry M. Levy

Frequent Co-Authors

Karin Strauss
Karin Strauss Microsoft (United States)
Dan Grossman
Dan Grossman University of Washington
Josep Torrellas
Josep Torrellas University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Brandon Lucia
Brandon Lucia Carnegie Mellon University
Georg Seelig
Georg Seelig University of Washington
Arvind Krishnamurthy
Arvind Krishnamurthy University of Washington
Calin Cascaval
Calin Cascaval Google (United States)
Sergey Yekhanin
Sergey Yekhanin Microsoft (United States)
Alvin Cheung
Alvin Cheung University of California, Berkeley
Carlos Guestrin
Carlos Guestrin Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to flexible education and diverse careers. Many students are now considering online programs for their affordability and accessibility. If cost is a concern, you might want to look into the cheapest online college options, which make quality education accessible without a hefty price tag.

Not everyone has a perfect academic record, and fortunately, there are top college that accepts low gpa programs available online. These institutions recognize potential beyond grades and offer supportive learning environments.

For those interested in multidisciplinary fields, earning an environmental science degree can lead to impactful roles in technology, sustainability, policy, and research.

Ambitious learners hoping to fast-track their tech careers can consider the fast track computer science degree route. Accelerated online programs can help you earn your degree more quickly, getting you into the workforce sooner.

Best Scientists Citing Luis Ceze

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles