World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Armando Solar-Lezama

Armando Solar-Lezama

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
45
Citations
9587
World Ranking
7135
National Ranking
3126

Armando Solar-Lezama publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Armando Solar-Lezama sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 160 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Armando Solar-Lezama D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Armando Solar-Lezama sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Armando Solar-Lezama is affiliated with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Computer Science, with significant contributions in Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, and Software. Further specializations include Hardware and Architecture as well as Computational Mechanics.

The scientist's work concentrates on several key topics, including Software Engineering Research, Logic, Programming, and Type Systems. They have also contributed to areas such as Reinforcement Learning in Robotics, Software Testing and Debugging Techniques, Topic Modeling, Manufacturing Process and Optimization, and 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis.

Their recent publications include:

  • "Fusion 360 gallery" (2021, ACM Transactions on Graphics)
  • "DreamCoder: growing generalizable, interpretable knowledge with wake-sleep Bayesian program learning" (2023, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences)
  • "JoinABLe: Learning Bottom-up Assembly of Parametric CAD Joints" (2022, 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR))
  • "Neurosymbolic Programming" (2021, Foundations and Trends® in Programming Languages)
  • "DreamCoder: Growing generalizable, interpretable knowledge with wake-sleep Bayesian program learning" (2020, arXiv (Cornell University))

Frequent collaborators in their research include Joshua B. Tenenbaum, Yewen Pu, Kevin Ellis, Wojciech Matusik, and Osbert Bastani.

Their publications often appear in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages, Artifact Digital Object Group, ACM Transactions on Graphics, and Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences.

Best Publications

  • Combinatorial sketching for finite programs

    Armando Solar-Lezama;Liviu Tancau;Rastislav Bodik;Sanjit Seshia

  • Syntax-guided synthesis

    Rajeev Alur;Rastislav Bodik;Garvit Juniwal;Milo M. K. Martin

  • Syntax-Guided Synthesis.

    Rajeev Alur;Rastislav Bodík;Eric Dallal;Dana Fisman

  • Automated feedback generation for introductory programming assignments

    Rishabh Singh;Sumit Gulwani;Armando Solar-Lezama

  • Program synthesis by sketching

    Rastislav Bodik;Armando Solar-Lezama

  • Programming by sketching for bit-streaming programs

    Armando Solar-Lezama;Rodric Rabbah;Rastislav Bodík;Kemal Ebcioğlu

  • Syntax-guided synthesis

    Rajeev Alur;Rastislav Bodik;Garvit Juniwal;Milo M. K. Martin

  • Program sketching

    Armando Solar-Lezama

  • Program synthesis from polymorphic refinement types

    Nadia Polikarpova;Ivan Kuraj;Armando Solar-Lezama

  • Sketching concurrent data structures

    Armando Solar-Lezama;Christopher Grant Jones;Rastislav Bodik

  • Verifiable Reinforcement Learning via Policy Extraction

    Osbert Bastani;Yewen Pu;Armando Solar-Lezama

  • QuixBugs: a multi-lingual program repair benchmark set based on the quixey challenge

    Derrick Lin;James Koppel;Angela Chen;Armando Solar-Lezama

  • Towards optimization-safe systems: analyzing the impact of undefined behavior

    Xi Wang;Nickolai Zeldovich;M. Frans Kaashoek;Armando Solar-Lezama

  • Sketching stencils

    Armando Solar-Lezama;Gilad Arnold;Liviu Tancau;Rastislav Bodik

  • A language for automatically enforcing privacy policies

    Jean Yang;Kuat Yessenov;Armando Solar-Lezama

  • The Sketching Approach to Program Synthesis

    Armando Solar-Lezama

  • Optimizing database-backed applications with query synthesis

    Alvin Cheung;Armando Solar-Lezama;Samuel Madden

  • Learning to Infer Graphics Programs from Hand-Drawn Images

    Kevin Ellis;Daniel Ritchie;Armando Solar-Lezama;Joshua B. Tenenbaum

  • Fusion 360 gallery: a dataset and environment for programmatic CAD construction from human design sequences

    Karl D. D. Willis;Yewen Pu;Jieliang Luo;Hang Chu

  • Synthesizing data structure manipulations from storyboards

    Rishabh Singh;Armando Solar-Lezama

  • DreamCoder: Growing generalizable, interpretable knowledge with wake-sleep Bayesian program learning

    Kevin Ellis;Catherine Wong;Maxwell I. Nye;Mathias Sablé-Meyer

  • Write, Execute, Assess: Program Synthesis with a REPL

    Kevin Ellis;Maxwell I. Nye;Yewen Pu;Felix Sosa

  • DreamCoder: bootstrapping inductive program synthesis with wake-sleep library learning

    Kevin Ellis;Catherine Wong;Maxwell Nye;Mathias Sablé-Meyer

Frequent Co-Authors

Rishabh Singh
Rishabh Singh Google (United States)
Alvin Cheung
Alvin Cheung University of California, Berkeley
Rajeev Alur
Rajeev Alur University of Pennsylvania
Rastislav Bodik
Rastislav Bodik University of Washington
Jeffrey S. Foster
Jeffrey S. Foster Tufts University
Swarat Chaudhuri
Swarat Chaudhuri The University of Texas at Austin
Sanjit A. Seshia
Sanjit A. Seshia University of California, Berkeley

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

When considering a degree in Computer Science in the USA, it's smart to explore related fields and flexible pathways to advance your career. Online degrees make it possible to fast-track your education, balance life commitments, and access a wider range of job options.

A fast track computer science degree is ideal for those looking to gain skills and enter the workforce quickly. These accelerated programs let you complete coursework in less time and can open doors to tech roles sooner than traditional programs.

Expanding your focus, you might also consider fields like environmental sciences or engineering for diverse career outcomes. For example, understanding what jobs can you get with an environmental science degree shows a pathway to roles in sustainability, research, and consulting.

Technical fields such as environmental engineering degree or an online mechanical engineering degree also pair well with computer science skills, leading to hybrid roles in automation, design, and systems analysis.

Blending your interests with an online degree program can maximize your opportunities for growth in today’s digital job market.

Best Scientists Citing Armando Solar-Lezama

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles