World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
45
Citations
11021
World Ranking
7084
National Ranking
3109

Cesare Tinelli publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cesare Tinelli sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 167 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Cesare Tinelli D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cesare Tinelli sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Cesare Tinelli is affiliated with the University of Iowa in the United States. Their research contributions lie primarily within the field of Computer Science, covering a total of 99 publications across various subfields.

The main subfields of study for Tinelli include:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Software
  • Information Systems
  • Management Science and Operations Research

Tinelli's work focuses on several core topics, such as:

  • Formal Methods in Verification
  • Logic, programming, and type systems
  • Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
  • Software Reliability and Analysis Research
  • Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques
  • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy

Their recent publications illustrate a range of interests in system safety, formal verification, and automated reasoning. Key papers include:

  • "VERDICT: A Language and Framework for Engineering Cyber Resilient and Safe System" (2021), published in Systems
  • "SYSLITE: Syntax-Guided Synthesis of PLTL Formulas from Finite Traces" (2020), published in reposiTUm (TU Wien)
  • "Generating and Exploiting Automated Reasoning Proof Certificates" (2023), published in Communications of the ACM
  • "Reductions for Strings and Regular Expressions Revisited" (2020), published in reposiTUm (TU Wien)
  • "Towards Satisfiability Modulo Parametric Bit-vectors" (2021), published in Journal of Automated Reasoning

Tinelli has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Clark Barrett
  • Andrew Reynolds
  • Yoni Zohar
  • Haniel Barbosa
  • Andres Nötzli

Their work has been published extensively in notable venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of Automated Reasoning
  • EPiC series in computing
  • ACM SIGAda Ada Letters
  • Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Best Publications

  • Satisfiability Modulo Theories

    Clark W. Barrett;Cesare Tinelli

  • The SMT-LIB Standard Version 2.0

    Clark Barrett;Aaron Stump;Cesare Tinelli

  • Solving SAT and SAT Modulo Theories: From an abstract Davis--Putnam--Logemann--Loveland procedure to DPLL(T)

    Robert Nieuwenhuis;Albert Oliveras;Cesare Tinelli

  • cvc5: A Versatile and Industrial-Strength SMT Solver

    Unknown

  • DPLL(T): Fast Decision Procedures

    Harald Ganzinger;George Hagen;Robert Nieuwenhuis;Albert Oliveras

  • Cvc4

    Unknown

  • Starexec: A cross-community infrastructure for logic solving

    Aaron Stump;Geoff Sutcliffe;Cesare Tinelli

  • A New Correctness Proof of the Nelson-Oppen Combination Procedure

    Cesare Tinelli;Mehdi T. Harandi

  • A DPLL(T) Theory Solver for a Theory of Strings and Regular Expressions

    Tianyi Liang;Andrew Reynolds;Cesare Tinelli;Clark Barrett

  • Counterexample-Guided Quantifier Instantiation for Synthesis in SMT

    Andrew Reynolds;Morgan Deters;Viktor Kuncak;Cesare Tinelli

  • The SMT-LIB Standard: Version 1.2

    Silvio Ranise;Cesare Tinelli

  • Abstract DPLL and Abstract DPLL Modulo Theories

    Robert Nieuwenhuis;Albert Oliveras;Cesare Tinelli

  • Splitting on demand in SAT modulo theories

    Clark Barrett;Robert Nieuwenhuis;Albert Oliveras;Cesare Tinelli

  • Scaling Up the Formal Verification of Lustre Programs with SMT-Based Techniques

    G. Hagen;C. Tinelli

  • Solving quantified verification conditions using satisfiability modulo theories

    Yeting Ge;Clark Barrett;Cesare Tinelli

  • A DPLL-Based Calculus for Ground Satisfiability Modulo Theories

    Cesare Tinelli

  • The model evolution calculus

    Peter Baumgartner;Cesare Tinelli

  • The Kind 2 Model Checker

    Adrien Champion;Alain Mebsout;Christoph Sticksel;Cesare Tinelli

  • Unions of non-disjoint theories and combinations of satisfiability procedures

    Cesare Tinelli;Christophe Ringeissen

  • Combining Nonstably Infinite Theories

    Cesare Tinelli;Calogero G. Zarba

  • Computing finite models by reduction to function-free clause logic

    Peter Baumgartner;Alexander Fuchs;Hans de Nivelle;Cesare Tinelli

  • Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems

    Christel Baier;Cesare Tinelli

Frequent Co-Authors

Clark Barrett
Clark Barrett Stanford University
Franz Baader
Franz Baader TU Dresden
Christel Baier
Christel Baier TU Dresden
Geoff Sutcliffe
Geoff Sutcliffe University of Miami
Arie Gurfinkel
Arie Gurfinkel University of Waterloo
Scott A. Smolka
Scott A. Smolka Stony Brook University
Silvio Ghilardi
Silvio Ghilardi University of Milan
Leonardo de Moura
Leonardo de Moura Microsoft (United States)
Viktor Kuncak
Viktor Kuncak École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Reiner Hähnle
Reiner Hähnle Technical University of Darmstadt

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you consider a Computer Science education in the USA, exploring online degree options can open flexible and affordable pathways to various careers. Many students weigh the benefits of pursuing advanced education while managing work and life commitments.

If cost is a priority, cheap doctoral programs can make it feasible to earn a terminal degree without significant debt. For professionals seeking leadership roles in education or academia, pursuing one of the quickest edd program options may fast-track your credentials and career progression.

Not everyone is ready to commit to a multi-year program. An accelerated associates degree online can provide rapid entry into the job market and build a foundation for further study. Meanwhile, for future tech entrepreneurs or those interested in the business side of technology, exploring business degree programs online can complement your technical skills and broaden your career prospects.

With so many affordable, fast, and flexible options available, students can find an educational path that matches their goals—whether advancing within computer science or branching into related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Cesare Tinelli

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles