World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
50
Citations
18772
World Ranking
5482
National Ranking
2503

Nikolaj Bjørner publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nikolaj Bjørner sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 192 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Nikolaj Bjørner D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nikolaj Bjørner sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nikolaj Bjørner is affiliated with Microsoft in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of Computer Science, publishing 39 papers in various subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Software, Information Systems, and Hardware and Architecture.

Their research addresses a broad range of topics, with a focus on Formal Methods in Verification, Logic, Programming, and Type Systems, Software Testing and Debugging Techniques, Software Engineering Research, Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques, Embedded Systems Design Techniques, and Blockchain Technology Applications and Security.

Frequent co-authors in their publications include Laura Kovács, Clemens Eisenhofer, Lev Nachmanson, Maxwell Levatich, and Shuo Chen.

Typical venues for their publications are diverse and include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Formal Aspects of Computing
  • Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages
  • Artifact Digital Object Group
  • Formal Methods in System Design

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Nikolaj Bjørner include:

  • SpEQ: Translation of Sparse Codes using Equivalences (2024), Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages
  • Algebra-Based Reasoning for Loop Synthesis (2022), Formal Aspects of Computing
  • dZ3: Artifact for "Symbolic Boolean Derivatives for Efficiently Solving Extended Regular Expression Constraints" (2021), Artifact Digital Object Group
  • Preface of the special issue on the conference on formal methods in computer aided design 2018 (2021), Formal Methods in System Design
  • An Ethereum-compatible blockchain that explicates and ensures design-level safety properties for smart contracts (2023), arXiv (Cornell University)

Best Publications

  • Z3: an efficient SMT solver

    Leonardo De Moura;Nikolaj Bjørner

  • Satisfiability modulo theories: introduction and applications

    Leonardo De Moura;Nikolaj Bjørner

  • Efficient E-Matching for SMT Solvers

    Leonardo Moura;Nikolaj Bjørner

  • Generalized property directed reachability

    Kryštof Hoder;Nikolaj Bjørner

  • Universal naming scheme for peer-to-peer resources

    Dan Teodosiu;Nikolaj S. Bjorner;Markus M. Breunig

  • Horn Clause Solvers for Program Verification

    Nikolaj Bjørner;Arie Gurfinkel;Kenneth L. McMillan;Andrey Rybalchenko

  • vZ - An Optimizing SMT Solver

    Nikolaj BjØrner;Anh-Dung Phan;Lars Fleckenstein

  • Satisfiability Modulo Theories: An Appetizer

    Leonardo Moura;Nikolaj Bjørner

  • STeP: The Stanford Temporal Prover

    Zohar Manna;Nikolaj Bjørner;Anca Browne;Edward Y. Chang

  • VeriCon: towards verifying controller programs in software-defined networks

    Thomas Ball;Nikolaj Bjørner;Aaron Gember;Shachar Itzhaky

  • Path Feasibility Analysis for String-Manipulating Programs

    Nikolaj Bjørner;Nikolai Tillmann;Andrei Voronkov

  • STeP: Deductive-Algorithmic Verification of Reactive and Real-Time Systems

    Nikolaj Bjørner;Anca Browne;Eddie Chang;Michael Colón

  • Automatic generation of invariants and intermediate assertions

    Nikolaj Bjørner;Anca Browne;Zohar Manna

  • Checking beliefs in dynamic networks

    Nuno P. Lopes;Nikolaj Bjørner;Patrice Godefroid;Karthick Jayaraman

  • Automated Deduction - CADE-23 : 23rd International Conference on Automated Deduction

    Nikolaj Bjørner;Viorica Sofronie-Stokkermans

  • Symbolic finite state transducers: algorithms and applications

    Margus Veanes;Pieter Hooimeijer;Benjamin Livshits;David Molnar

  • Generalized, efficient array decision procedures

    Leonardo de Moura;Nikolaj Bjorner

  • On Solving Universally Quantified Horn Clauses

    Nikolaj Bjørner;Kenneth L. McMillan;Andrey Rybalchenko;Andrey Rybalchenko

  • Verifying Temporal Properties of Reactive Systems: A STeP Tutorial

    Nikolaj S. Bjørner;Anca Browne;Michael A. Colón;Bernd Finkbeiner

  • µZ: an efficient engine for fixed points with constraints

    Kryštof Hoder;Nikolaj Bjørner;Leonardo De Moura

  • Locator and tracking service for peer to peer resources

    Dan Teodosiu;Nikolaj S. Bjorner;Markus M. Breunig

Frequent Co-Authors

Leonardo de Moura
Leonardo de Moura Microsoft (United States)
Margus Veanes
Margus Veanes Microsoft (United States)
Yuri Gurevich
Yuri Gurevich University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Zohar Manna
Zohar Manna Stanford University
Andrey Rybalchenko
Andrey Rybalchenko Microsoft (United States)
Mooly Sagiv
Mooly Sagiv Tel Aviv University
Wolfram Schulte
Wolfram Schulte Microsoft (United States)
Kenneth L. McMillan
Kenneth L. McMillan Microsoft (United States)
Arie Gurfinkel
Arie Gurfinkel University of Waterloo
Henny B. Sipma
Henny B. Sipma Aarno Labs

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring best associate degree in 6 months online programs can be a fast-track way to launch your career in tech or as a stepping stone into a bachelor’s program. These accelerated online degrees are also ideal for career changers seeking foundational skills in a short timeframe.

Many students consider a online degree in business to complement their computer science studies, broadening opportunities in tech entrepreneurship, management, and product development roles.

Accessibility and affordability are key considerations for online education. Finding the cheapest bachelor degree can help reduce debt and make higher education achievable for more students, opening doors to high-demand computer science and IT careers.

For those interested in related fields, earning an online engineering degree combines technical computer science knowledge with hands-on skills in areas like software, electrical, or mechanical engineering, further expanding career prospects in innovative industries.

Best Scientists Citing Nikolaj Bjørner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles