World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
36
Citations
4937
World Ranking
11334
National Ranking
444

Arie Gurfinkel publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arie Gurfinkel sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 152 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Arie Gurfinkel D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arie Gurfinkel sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Arie Gurfinkel is affiliated with the University of Waterloo in Canada, contributing extensively to the field of Computer Science. Their research spans multiple specialized areas including Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Software, Information Systems, and Hardware and Architecture.

The body of work produced by Gurfinkel covers a range of topics, primarily focusing on Formal Methods in Verification, Software Testing and Debugging Techniques, and Logic, Programming, and Type Systems. Other significant topics in their research portfolio include Security and Verification in Computing, Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques, Blockchain Technology Applications and Security, and Advanced Malware Detection Techniques.

Gurfinkel's recent scholarly publications include:

  • "Inductive Predicate Synthesis Modulo Programs (Extended)," 2024, Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)
  • "Global guidance for local generalization in model checking," 2023, Formal Methods in System Design
  • "Btor2MLIR: A Format and Toolchain for Hardware Verification," 2023, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Solving constrained Horn clauses modulo algebraic data types and recursive functions," 2022, Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages
  • "Compositional Verification of Smart Contracts Through Communication Abstraction (Extended)," 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Gurfinkel include Jorge A. Navas, Sharon Shoham, Hari Govind V K, Isabel Garcia-Contreras, and Richard Trefler. These collaborations highlight a network of partnerships with researchers active across related domains in formal verification and software engineering.

Gurfinkel's publishing venues reflect an emphasis on both traditional and open-access platforms, with a significant number of publications appearing in:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages
  • Formal Methods in System Design
  • Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)

The scholar also has a presence in academic book publishing, with one book titled "NASA Formal Methods" published by Springer Science+Business Media in 2022, contributing to foundational literature in formal methods.

Best Publications

  • SMT-based model checking for recursive programs

    Anvesh Komuravelli;Arie Gurfinkel;Sagar Chaki

  • The SeaHorn Verification Framework

    Arie Gurfinkel;Temesghen Kahsai;Anvesh Komuravelli;Jorge A. Navas

  • Horn Clause Solvers for Program Verification

    Nikolaj Bjørner;Arie Gurfinkel;Kenneth L. McMillan;Andrey Rybalchenko

  • Multi-valued symbolic model-checking

    Marsha Chechik;Benet Devereux;Steve Easterbrook;Arie Gurfinkel

  • Symbolic optimization with SMT solvers

    Yi Li;Aws Albarghouthi;Zachary Kincaid;Arie Gurfinkel

  • UFO: a framework for abstractionand interpolation-based software verification

    Aws Albarghouthi;Yi Li;Arie Gurfinkel;Marsha Chechik

  • Automatic abstraction in SMT-Based unbounded software model checking

    Anvesh Komuravelli;Arie Gurfinkel;Sagar Chaki;Edmund M. Clarke

  • Multi-valued Model Checking via Classical Model Checking

    Arie Gurfinkel;Marsha Chechik

  • Simple and precise static analysis of untrusted Linux kernel extensions

    Elazar Gershuni;Nadav Amit;Arie Gurfinkel;Nina Narodytska

  • Whale: an interpolation-based algorithm for inter-procedural verification

    Aws Albarghouthi;Arie Gurfinkel;Marsha Chechik

  • YASM : A software model-checker for verification and refutation

    Arie Gurfinkel;Ou Wei;Marsha Chechik

  • Model-checking infinite state-space systems with fine-grained abstractions using SPIN

    Marsha Chechik;Benet Devereux;Arie Gurfinkel

  • BOXES: a symbolic abstract domain of boxes

    Arie Gurfinkel;Sagar Chaki

  • Binary Function Clustering Using Semantic Hashes

    Wesley Jin;Sagar Chaki;Cory Cohen;Arie Gurfinkel

  • From under-approximations to over-approximations and back

    Aws Albarghouthi;Arie Gurfinkel;Marsha Chechik

  • How Vacuous Is Vacuous

    Arie Gurfinkel;Marsha Chechik

  • SeaHorn: A Framework for Verifying C Programs Competition Contribution

    Arie Gurfinkel;Temesghen Kahsai;Jorge A. Navas

  • Temporal logic query checking: a tool for model exploration

    A. Gurfinkel;M. Chechik;B. Devereux

  • Craig interpretation

    Aws Albarghouthi;Arie Gurfinkel;Marsha Chechik

  • Why waste a perfectly good abstraction

    Arie Gurfinkel;Marsha Chechik

Frequent Co-Authors

Marsha Chechik
Marsha Chechik University of Toronto
Sagar Chaki
Sagar Chaki Siemens (United States)
Ofer Strichman
Ofer Strichman Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Nikolaj Bjørner
Nikolaj Bjørner Microsoft (United States)
Edmund M. Clarke
Edmund M. Clarke Carnegie Mellon University
Kenneth L. McMillan
Kenneth L. McMillan Microsoft (United States)
Steve Easterbrook
Steve Easterbrook University of Toronto
Cesare Tinelli
Cesare Tinelli University of Iowa
Sanjit A. Seshia
Sanjit A. Seshia University of California, Berkeley
Sharad Malik
Sharad Malik Princeton University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online electrical engineering degree ranking options can open doors to top programs that blend well with a Computer Science education. Many students look for programs that offer flexibility, strong reputations, and direct connections to emerging tech fields.

In addition to full degrees, targeted certifications for jobs can quickly boost your credentials and increase job prospects in IT, cybersecurity, and data analytics. These certifications are often fast to complete and recognized by employers.

For those seeking to advance rapidly, quick masters degrees online allow professionals to grow their skill sets and move up the career ladder without a lengthy time commitment.

Unsure of which area to specialize in next? Explore the most valuable options with what masters program should I do to discover high-demand programs that align with current tech job trends.

Best Scientists Citing Arie Gurfinkel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles