World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
89
Citations
35410
World Ranking
12532
National Ranking
406

Mark Jones publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Jones sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 544 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Mark Jones D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Jones sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark Jones is affiliated with Bond University in Australia and has contributed extensively to the field of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology. Their research spans multiple subfields including Molecular Biology, Genetics, Paleontology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, and Artificial Intelligence.

The primary focus of their work lies in genomics and phylogenetic studies, genetic diversity and population structure, and bioinformatics and genomic networks. Other notable areas of study include evolution and paleontology studies, genome rearrangement algorithms, plant and animal studies, and algorithms and data compression.

Jones has published in several venues with notable frequency. These include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Algorithmica
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Computer and System Sciences
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Their recent papers cover important contributions in mathematical biology and algorithm development related to phylogenetic networks and tree structures. Selected recent publications include:

  • "Distinguishing level-1 phylogenetic networks on the basis of data generated by Markov processes," 2021, Journal of Mathematical Biology
  • "Orchard Networks are Trees with Additional Horizontal Arcs," 2022, Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
  • "A Practical Fixed-Parameter Algorithm for Constructing Tree-Child Networks from Multiple Binary Trees," 2022, Algorithmica
  • "A unifying characterization of tree-based networks and orchard networks using cherry covers," 2021, Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)
  • "Ceftobiprole Medocaril Is an Effective Post-Exposure Treatment in the Fischer 344 Rat Model of Pneumonic Tularemia," 2023, Antibiotics

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Leo van Iersel
  • Yukihiro Murakami
  • Remie Janssen
  • Norbert Zeh
  • Katharina T. Huber

Jones's work incorporates a multidisciplinary approach, integrating concepts from computational biology and algorithm design to explore genetic and evolutionary questions. The range of publication venues and diverse coauthors highlights a collaborative and cross-domain research profile.

Best Publications

  • Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

    Luca Richeldi;Luca Richeldi;Harold R Collard;Mark G Jones

  • Clinical Reasoning in the Health Professions

    Joy Higgs;Mark A. Jones

  • A systematic review of physicians' survival predictions in terminally ill cancer patients

    Paul Glare;Kiran Virik;Mark Jones;Malcolm Hudson

  • Neuraminidase inhibitors for preventing and treating influenza in adults and children

    Tom Jefferson;Mark A Jones;Peter Doshi;Chris B Del Mar

  • Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses.

    Tom Jefferson;Chris B Del Mar;Liz Dooley;Eliana Ferroni

  • Neuraminidase inhibitors for preventing and treating influenza in healthy adults and children

    Tom Jefferson;Mark A Jones;Peter Doshi;Chris B Del Mar

  • Do u smoke after txt? Results of a randomised trial of smoking cessation using mobile phone text messaging

    Rodgers A;Corbett T;Bramley D;Riddell T

  • Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on utilisation of healthcare services: a systematic review.

    Ray Moynihan;Sharon Sanders;Zoe A Michaleff;Anna Mae Scott

  • The Prevalence and Risk Factors of Dysmenorrhea

    Hong Ju;Mark Jones;Gita Mishra

  • Clinical reasoning strategies in physical therapy

    Ian Edwards;Mark Jones;Judi Carr;Annette Braunack-Mayer

  • Oseltamivir for influenza in adults and children: systematic review of clinical study reports and summary of regulatory comments.

    Tom Jefferson;Mark Jones;Peter Doshi;Elizabeth A Spencer

  • Neuraminidase inhibitors for preventing and treating influenza in healthy adults and children

    Tom Jefferson;Mark A. Jones;Peter Doshi;Chris B. Del Mar

  • 3-month, 6-month, 9-month, and 12-month respiratory outcomes in patients following COVID-19-related hospitalisation: a prospective study.

    Xiaojun Wu;Xiaofan Liu;Yilu Zhou;Hongying Yu

  • Antivirals for influenza in healthy adults: systematic review

    T Jefferson;V Demicheli;D Rivetti;M Jones

  • Neuraminidase inhibitors for preventing and treating influenza in healthy adults: systematic review and meta-analysis

    Tom Jefferson;Mark Jones;Peter Doshi;Chris Del Mar

  • A Randomized Trial of High-Flow Oxygen Therapy in Infants with Bronchiolitis

    Donna Franklin;Franz E Babl;Luregn Jan Schlapbach;Ed Oakley

  • Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: Disease mechanisms and drug development.

    Paolo Spagnolo;Jonathan A. Kropski;Mark G. Jones;Joyce S. Lee

  • Prevalence of anxiety disorders among adults seeking speech therapy for stuttering.

    Lisa Iverach;Sue O’Brian;Mark Jones;Susan Block

  • Neuraminidase inhibitors for preventing and treating influenza in healthy adults

    Tom Jefferson;Mark A Jones;Peter Doshi;Chris B Del Mar

  • Randomised controlled trial of the Lidcombe programme of early stuttering intervention

    Mark Jones;Mark Onslow;Ann Packman;Shelley Williams

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark Onslow
Mark Onslow University of Technology Sydney
Ann Packman
Ann Packman University of Technology Sydney
Luca Richeldi
Luca Richeldi Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Tom Jefferson
Tom Jefferson University of Oxford
Sue O'Brian
Sue O'Brian University of Technology Sydney
Ross G. Menzies
Ross G. Menzies University of Technology Sydney
Donna E. Davies
Donna E. Davies University of Southampton
Gita D. Mishra
Gita D. Mishra University of Queensland
Carl Heneghan
Carl Heneghan University of Oxford
David L. Paterson
David L. Paterson University of Queensland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine doesn’t always mean becoming a physician. There are a range of online LPN programs that provide a fast, flexible entry into nursing, especially for those looking to enter the workforce quickly. Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) play a crucial role in healthcare teams and provide essential patient care.

For nurses eager to advance, psych nurse practitioner programs can open the door to specialized careers in mental health. These advanced degrees are offered online and help professionals meet the growing demand for mental health services across the U.S.

If you are more interested in the business side of healthcare, enrolling in the cheapest MHA programs online can be an affordable way to gain key administrative and leadership skills. An MHA (Master of Healthcare Administration) prepares graduates for management roles in hospitals, clinics, and public health organizations.

Many universities also offer affordable MHA online programs designed for working professionals. These flexible degrees can help you take your healthcare career to the next level, all while keeping tuition costs in check.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Jones

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles