World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
44
Citations
7174
World Ranking
5090
National Ranking
1741

Anna M. Pidgeon publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anna M. Pidgeon sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 139 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Anna M. Pidgeon D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anna M. Pidgeon sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Anna M. Pidgeon is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Environmental Science, with a substantial contribution across various subfields including Ecology, Ecological Modeling, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, and Environmental Engineering.

The scientist's work centers on multiple topics within environmental and ecological studies. These include:

  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Remote Sensing in Agriculture
  • Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
  • Avian ecology and behavior

Among their recent papers are several significant publications that highlight their areas of expertise. Notable papers include:

  • "Impacts of the coronavirus pandemic on biodiversity conservation," 2020, Biological Conservation
  • "Satellite image texture captures vegetation heterogeneity and explains patterns of bird richness," 2020, Remote Sensing of Environment
  • "Rising wildfire risk to houses in the United States, especially in grasslands and shrublands," 2023, Science
  • "Nationwide native forest structure maps for Argentina based on forest inventory data, SAR Sentinel-1 and vegetation metrics from Sentinel-2 imagery," 2022, Remote Sensing of Environment
  • "Habitat heterogeneity captured by 30-m resolution satellite image texture predicts bird richness across the United States," 2020, Ecological Applications

The scientist has frequently published in several academic venues, indicating consistent engagement with leading journals in environmental and ecological research. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Biological Conservation
  • Remote Sensing of Environment
  • Ecological Applications
  • Landscape and Urban Planning
  • Forest Ecology and Management

Collaborative work is a notable aspect of their research profile, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Volker C. Radeloff
  • Sebastián Martinuzzi
  • Eduarda Martiniano de Oliveira Silveira
  • Natalia Politi
  • Luis Rivera

Anna M. Pidgeon's body of work demonstrates a multidisciplinary approach toward investigating ecological patterns, conservation issues, and remote sensing applications in environmental science.

Best Publications

  • Creation of forest edges has a global impact on forest vertebrates

    M. Pfeifer;M. Pfeifer;V. Lefebvre;C.A. Peres;C. Banks-Leite

  • Housing growth in and near United States protected areas limits their conservation value.

    Volker C. Radeloff;Susan I. Stewart;Todd J. Hawbaker;Urs Gimmi

  • Impacts of the coronavirus pandemic on biodiversity conservation.

    Richard T. Corlett;Richard B. Primack;Vincent Devictor;Bea Maas

  • Image texture as a remotely sensed measure of vegetation structure

    Eric M. Wood;Anna M. Pidgeon;Volker C. Radeloff;Nicholas S. Keuler

  • Extinction filters mediate the global effects of habitat fragmentation on animals.

    Matthew G. Betts;Christopher Wolf;Marion Pfeifer;Cristina Banks-Leite

  • The rise of novelty in ecosystems.

    Volker C. Radeloff;John W. Williams;Brooke L. Bateman;Kevin D. Burke

  • Human Impacts on Regional Avian Diversity and Abundance

    Christopher A. Lepczyk;Christopher A. Lepczyk;Curtis H. Flather;Volker C. Radeloff;Anna M. Pidgeon

  • High-resolution image texture as a predictor of bird species richness

    Véronique St-Louis;Anna M. Pidgeon;Volker C. Radeloff;Todd J. Hawbaker

  • Satellite image texture and a vegetation index predict avian biodiversity in the Chihuahuan Desert of New Mexico

    Véronique St‐Louis;Anna M. Pidgeon;Murray K. Clayton;Brian A. Locke

  • Effects of drought on avian community structure

    Thomas P. Albright;Anna M. Pidgeon;Chadwick D. Rittenhouse;Murray K. Clayton

  • Associations of forest bird species richness with housing and landscape patterns across the USA.

    A. M. Pidgeon;V. C. Radeloff;C. H. Flather;C. A. Lepczyk

  • Opportunities for the application of advanced remotely-sensed data in ecological studies of terrestrial animal movement

    Wiebke Neumann;Wiebke Neumann;Sebastian Martinuzzi;Anna B Estes;Anna B Estes;Anna M Pidgeon

  • Spring plant phenology and false springs in the conterminous US during the 21st century

    Andrew J Allstadt;Stephen J Vavrus;Patricia J Heglund;Anna M Pidgeon

  • The dynamic habitat indices (DHIs) from MODIS and global biodiversity

    V.C. Radeloff;M. Dubinin;N.C. Coops;A.M. Allen

  • Modeling forest songbird species richness using LiDAR-derived measures of forest structure

    Adrian A. Lesak;Volker C. Radeloff;Todd J. Hawbaker;Anna M. Pidgeon

  • Current and Future Land Use around a Nationwide Protected Area Network

    Christopher M. Hamilton;Sebastian Martinuzzi;Andrew J. Plantinga;Volker C. Radeloff

  • Rapid declines of large mammal populations after the collapse of the Soviet Union

    Eugenia V. Bragina;Eugenia V. Bragina;A. R. Ives;A. M. Pidgeon;T. Kuemmerle

  • Habitat and population modelling of roe deer using an interactive geographic information system

    Volker C. Radeloff;Anna M. Pidgeon;Patrick Hostert

  • A comparison of Dynamic Habitat Indices derived from different MODIS products as predictors of avian species richness

    Martina L. Hobi;Maxim Dubinin;Catherine H. Graham;Nicholas C. Coops

  • The pace of past climate change vs. potential bird distributions and land use in the United States.

    Brooke L. Bateman;Anna M. Pidgeon;Volker C. Radeloff;Jeremy VanDerWal

  • Heat waves measured with MODIS land surface temperature data predict changes in avian community structure

    Thomas P. Albright;Anna M. Pidgeon;Chadwick D. Rittenhouse;Murray K. Clayton

  • Modeling habitat suitability for Greater Rheas based on satellite image texture.

    Laura M. Bellis;Anna M. Pidgeon;Volker C. Radeloff;Véronique St-Louis

Frequent Co-Authors

Volker C. Radeloff
Volker C. Radeloff University of Wisconsin–Madison
Curtis H. Flather
Curtis H. Flather US Forest Service
Murray K. Clayton
Murray K. Clayton University of Wisconsin–Madison
Wayne E. Thogmartin
Wayne E. Thogmartin United States Geological Survey
Christopher A. Lepczyk
Christopher A. Lepczyk Auburn University
Tobias Kuemmerle
Tobias Kuemmerle Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Nicholas C. Coops
Nicholas C. Coops University of British Columbia
Thomas M. Brooks
Thomas M. Brooks International Union for Conservation of Nature
Andrew J. Plantinga
Andrew J. Plantinga University of California, Santa Barbara
Todd J. Hawbaker
Todd J. Hawbaker United States Geological Survey

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Ecology and Evolution opens the door to diverse opportunities—some of which intersect with healthcare, research, and education. For those considering a shift or advancement in environmental or life sciences, there are specialized online pathways worth exploring.

If your interest bridges biology and healthcare, rn to np programs online can offer a route for registered nurses to become nurse practitioners, blending clinical expertise with understanding of ecosystem health. Non-nurses seeking advanced clinical roles might consider direct entry msn programs for a fast-tracked path into nursing leadership and research.

Choosing the right online institution is also crucial. For those weighing program options, comparisons like wgu vs chamberlain help clarify strengths in curriculum, cost, and flexibility—factors that matter in science and healthcare education. If your goal is to advance quickly and affordably, the rn to bsn to msn online programs are designed to streamline career progression.

Whether your path leads to research, conservation, public health, or education, these online degree routes provide adaptable ways to enhance your expertise and impact in related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Anna M. Pidgeon

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles