| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | Current World Ranking | National Ranking | Current National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 51 | 5592 | 5141 | 2476 | 2233 | 185 | 8078 |
The chart shows the history of publications by Michael M. Myers between 1975 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michael M. Myers published across 52 years, from 1975 to 2026, averaging 4.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 1999. 7 of the 241 publications appeared in the last two years.
241 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 1975 | 3 |
| 1976 | 0 |
| 1977 | 0 |
| 1978 | 0 |
| 1979 | 0 |
| 1980 | 1 |
| 1981 | 2 |
| 1982 | 1 |
| 1983 | 0 |
| 1984 | 0 |
| 1985 | 0 |
| 1986 | 2 |
| 1987 | 2 |
| 1988 | 2 |
| 1989 | 3 |
| 1990 | 1 |
| 1991 | 7 |
| 1992 | 3 |
| 1993 | 4 |
| 1994 | 4 |
| 1995 | 3 |
| 1996 | 13 |
| 1997 | 9 |
| 1998 | 9 |
| 1999 | 20 |
| 2000 | 4 |
| 2001 | 3 |
| 2002 | 4 |
| 2003 | 3 |
| 2004 | 3 |
| 2005 | 8 |
| 2006 | 3 |
| 2007 | 5 |
| 2008 | 4 |
| 2009 | 9 |
| 2010 | 5 |
| 2011 | 6 |
| 2012 | 5 |
| 2013 | 5 |
| 2014 | 5 |
| 2015 | 7 |
| 2016 | 6 |
| 2017 | 6 |
| 2018 | 8 |
| 2019 | 10 |
| 2020 | 8 |
| 2021 | 11 |
| 2022 | 8 |
| 2023 | 2 |
| 2024 | 7 |
| 2025 | 6 |
| 2026 | 1 |
| Total | 241 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael M. Myers sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 185 publications — 57th percentile
57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 38–47 | 18 | |
| 48–57 | 79 | |
| 58–67 | 193 | |
| 68–77 | 323 | |
| 78–87 | 406 | |
| 88–97 | 452 | |
| 98–107 | 539 | |
| 108–117 | 505 | |
| 118–127 | 522 | |
| 128–137 | 469 | |
| 138–147 | 456 | |
| 148–157 | 459 | |
| 158–167 | 397 | |
| 168–177 | 383 | |
| 178–187 | 350 | 185 |
| 188–197 | 302 | |
| 198–207 | 306 | |
| 208–217 | 262 | |
| 218–227 | 242 | |
| 228–237 | 220 | |
| 238–247 | 203 | |
| 248–257 | 174 | |
| 258–267 | 176 | |
| 268–277 | 175 | |
| 278–287 | 125 | |
| 288–297 | 116 | |
| 298–307 | 127 | |
| 308–317 | 128 | |
| 318–327 | 99 | |
| 328–337 | 89 | |
| 338–347 | 78 | |
| 348–357 | 96 | |
| 358–367 | 66 | |
| 368–377 | 59 | |
| 378–387 | 65 | |
| 388–397 | 54 | |
| 398–407 | 48 | |
| 408–417 | 49 | |
| 418–427 | 34 | |
| 428–437 | 31 | |
| 438–447 | 30 | |
| 448–457 | 31 | |
| 458–467 | 36 | |
| 468–477 | 40 | |
| 478–487 | 35 | |
| 488–497 | 30 | |
| 498–507 | 23 | |
| 508–517 | 26 | |
| 518–527 | 20 | |
| 528–537 | 23 | |
| 538–547 | 20 | |
| 548–557 | 20 | |
| 558–567 | 17 | |
| 568–577 | 14 | |
| 578–587 | 20 | |
| 588–597 | 20 | |
| 598–607 | 19 | |
| 608–617 | 18 | |
| 618–627 | 17 | |
| 628–637 | 11 | |
| 638–647 | 11 | |
| 648–657 | 11 | |
| 658–667 | 8 | |
| 668–677 | 7 | |
| 678–687 | 11 | |
| 688–697 | 10 | |
| 698–707 | 4 | |
| 708–717 | 6 | |
| 718–727 | 5 | |
| 728–737 | 5 | |
| 738–747 | 9 | |
| 748–757 | 9 | |
| 758–767 | 3 | |
| 768–777 | 7 | |
| 778–787 | 7 | |
| 788–797 | 6 | |
| 798–807 | 2 | |
| 808–817 | 2 | |
| 818–827 | 7 | |
| 828–837 | 0 | |
| 838–847 | 9 | |
| 848–857 | 3 | |
| 858–867 | 1 | |
| 868–877 | 3 | |
| 878–886 | 6 | |
| 887+ | 100 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael M. Myers sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 51 D-Index — 44th percentile
44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 30–31 | 42 | |
| 32–33 | 172 | |
| 34–35 | 296 | |
| 36–37 | 435 | |
| 38–39 | 459 | |
| 40–41 | 456 | |
| 42–43 | 467 | |
| 44–45 | 478 | |
| 46–47 | 512 | |
| 48–49 | 435 | |
| 50–51 | 425 | 51 |
| 52–53 | 418 | |
| 54–55 | 392 | |
| 56–57 | 357 | |
| 58–59 | 334 | |
| 60–61 | 328 | |
| 62–63 | 260 | |
| 64–65 | 278 | |
| 66–67 | 239 | |
| 68–69 | 250 | |
| 70–71 | 210 | |
| 72–73 | 200 | |
| 74–75 | 189 | |
| 76–77 | 170 | |
| 78–79 | 146 | |
| 80–81 | 113 | |
| 82–83 | 126 | |
| 84–85 | 100 | |
| 86–87 | 84 | |
| 88–89 | 99 | |
| 90–91 | 84 | |
| 92–93 | 85 | |
| 94–95 | 72 | |
| 96–97 | 76 | |
| 98–99 | 45 | |
| 100–101 | 49 | |
| 102–103 | 43 | |
| 104–105 | 32 | |
| 106–107 | 45 | |
| 108–109 | 50 | |
| 110–111 | 32 | |
| 112–113 | 39 | |
| 114–115 | 32 | |
| 116–117 | 29 | |
| 118–119 | 27 | |
| 120–121 | 19 | |
| 122–123 | 23 | |
| 124–125 | 27 | |
| 126–127 | 16 | |
| 128–129 | 24 | |
| 130–131 | 13 | |
| 132–133 | 21 | |
| 134–135 | 17 | |
| 136–137 | 14 | |
| 138–139 | 15 | |
| 140–141 | 10 | |
| 142–143 | 10 | |
| 144–145 | 13 | |
| 146–147 | 9 | |
| 148–149 | 8 | |
| 150–151 | 6 | |
| 152–153 | 6 | |
| 154–155 | 7 | |
| 156–157 | 7 | |
| 158–159 | 10 | |
| 160–161 | 4 | |
| 162 | 8 | |
| 163+ | 100 |
Catherine Monk;William P. Fifer;Michael M. Myers;Richard P. Sloan
Michael M. Myers;Susan A. Brunelli;Jonathan M. Squire;Richard D. Shindeldecker
Daniel S. Schechter;Susan W. Coates;Tammy Kaminer;Tammy Coots
R.P. Sloan;J.B. Korten;M.M. Myers
Catherine Monk;Richard P. Sloan;Michael M. Myers;Lauren Ellman
Catherine Monk;Michael M. Myers;Richard P. Sloan;Lauren M. Ellman
Lynn M. Evans;Michael M. Myers;Michael M. Myers;Catherine Monk;Catherine Monk;Catherine Monk
Natalie H. Brito;William P. Fifer;Michael M. Myers;Amy J. Elliott
Kimberly A. Dukes;Larry Burd;Amy J. Elliott;William P. Fifer;William P. Fifer
Daniel S. Pine;Gail A. Wasserman;Laurie Miller;Jeremy D. Coplan
Richard P. Sloan;Emilia Bagiella;Peter A. Shapiro;John P. Kuhl
Martha G. Welch;Michael M. Myers;Philip G. Grieve;Joseph R. Isler
Martha G Welch;Myron A Hofer;Susan A Brunelli;Raymond I Stark
Jhodie Rubina Duncan;Marianne Garland;Michael M. Myers;William P. Fifer
Daniel S. Schechter;Dominik A. Moser;Zhishun Wang;Rachel Marsh
Carol A. Murphy;Richard P. Sloan;Michael M. Myers
Martha G. Welch;Raymond I. Stark;Philip G. Grieve;Robert J. Ludwig
Daniel S. Schechter;Charles H Zeanah;Michael M Myers;Susan A Brunelli
Ismee A. Williams;Amanda R. Tarullo;Philip G. Grieve;Abigail Wilpers
William P. Fifer;Sherri Ten Fingers;Mitzi Youngman;Esperanza Gomez-Gribben
Etan Z. Zimmer;William P. Fifer;Young-Ihl Kim;Henry R. Rey
Paula S McKinley;Peter A Shapiro;Emilia Bagiella;Michael M Myers
Stephen W. Porges;Stephen W. Porges;Maria I. Davila;Gregory F. Lewis;Jacek Kolacz
B G Yongue;J A Angulo;B S McEwen;M M Myers
Rakesh Sahni;Karl F. Schulze;Sudha Kashyap;Kiyoko Ohira-Kist
Hannah C Kinney;Michael M Myers;Richard A Belliveau;Leslie L Randall
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
Exploring Neuroscience opens doors to diverse career paths, but it’s also helpful to consider how related majors, online degrees, and flexible study options can impact your education and future earnings. For students interested in maximizing their career potential, reviewing the best majors in college can provide insights into which disciplines offer the highest salaries and strongest job demand.
Affordability and access are key concerns. If you’re looking for flexible, budget-friendly learning, choose an online school that accepts fafsa so you can qualify for federal financial aid without being limited by location.
Complementing your Neuroscience studies with specialized certification can also boost your employability. Explore job certifications online to quickly develop marketable skills, especially if you wish to pivot to health tech, data analysis, or lab management.
For those striving for a quicker or less intensive pathway into the working world, there are options for the easy university degrees and majors online—ideal if you want to build a foundation before specializing further in neuroscience or healthcare.
Northeast Normal University
MIT
Council of Scientific and Industrial Research
University of Victoria
Radboud University
University of Melbourne
University of Montreal
Tufts University
Chinese Academy of Sciences
University of Utah
University of Tokyo
National Institute for Astrophysics
Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Ruđer Bošković Institute
University of Birmingham
Sciences Po