World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
58
Citations
14368
World Ranking
3855
National Ranking
191

Eni S. Becker publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eni S. Becker sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 282 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Eni S. Becker D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eni S. Becker sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Eni S. Becker is affiliated with Radboud University in the Netherlands and has an extensive publication record primarily in the field of psychology. Their research covers a broad range of subfields including clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, cognitive neuroscience, social psychology, and developmental and educational psychology. The bulk of their work pivots around topics related to anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, and cognitive processes.

Becker's scholarly output includes notable papers such as:

  • "Biased approach-avoidance tendencies in psychopathology: A systematic review of their assessment and modification" (2020, Clinical Psychology Review)
  • "Cognitive Remediation Therapy Does Not Enhance Treatment Effect in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and Anorexia Nervosa: A Randomized Controlled Trial" (2020, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics)
  • "Does comorbid anxiety or depression moderate effects of approach bias modification in the treatment of alcohol use disorders?" (2021, Psychology of Addictive Behaviors)
  • "A Cognitive Control Training as Add-On Treatment to Usual Care for Depressed Inpatients" (2021, Cognitive Therapy and Research)
  • "Comorbid depression and treatment of anxiety disorders, OCD, and PTSD: Diagnosis versus severity" (2021, Journal of Affective Disorders)

Their frequent co-authors indicate collaboration with researchers such as Mike Rinck, Janna N. Vrijsen, Wolf-Gero Lange, Ernst H. W. Koster, and Tanja Legenbauer.

Eni S. Becker's publications often appear in specialized journals related to cognitive and clinical psychology. Key venues include:

  • Cognitive Therapy and Research
  • Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
  • Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health
  • Clinical Psychology Review

Their work addresses a variety of important topics within psychology such as mental health research, psychopathy and forensic psychiatry, behavioral interventions, and studies on perfectionism, procrastination, and anxiety. Child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development is also a significant focus.

Overall, Becker's research presents a comprehensive contribution to understanding and treating psychological disorders, particularly through cognitive and behavioral approaches. Their multidisciplinary perspective stretches across clinical interventions and theoretical cognitive frameworks within psychology.

Best Publications

  • Retraining Automatic Action Tendencies Changes Alcoholic Patients’ Approach Bias for Alcohol and Improves Treatment Outcome

    Reinout W. Wiers;Carolin Eberl;Mike Rinck;Eni S. Becker

  • Approach and avoidance in fear of spiders.

    Mike Rinck;Eni S. Becker

  • Prevalence, incidence and stability of premenstrual dysphoric disorder in the community.

    Hans-Ulrich Wittchen;E. Becker;R. Lieb;P. Krause

  • Approach bias modification in alcohol dependence: Do clinical effects replicate and for whom does it work best?

    Carolin Eberl;Reinout W. Wiers;Steffen Pawelczack;Mike Rinck

  • Avoidance of emotional facial expressions in social anxiety: The Approach–Avoidance Task

    Kathrin Heuer;Mike Rinck;Eni S. Becker

  • Psychometric properties of the Positive Mental Health Scale (PMH-scale)

    Justina Lukat;Jürgen Margraf;Rainer Lutz;William van der Veld

  • The epidemiology of generalized anxiety disorder in Europe.

    Roselind Lieb;Eni Becker;Carlo Altamura

  • The emotional Stroop effect in anxiety disorders: General emotionality or disorder specificity?

    Eni S Becker;Mike Rinck;Jürgen Margraf;Walton T Roth

  • Age of traumatisation as a predictor of post-traumatic stress disorder or major depression in young women.

    Andreas Maercker;Tanja Michael;Lydia Fehm;Eni S. Becker

  • Spider fearful individuals attend to threat, then quickly avoid it: evidence from eye movements.

    Mike Rinck;Eni S. Becker

  • Epidemiology of specific phobia subtypes: Findings from the Dresden Mental Health Study

    Eni S. Becker;Mike Rinck;Veneta Türke;Petra Kause

  • A comparison of attentional biases and memory biases in women with social phobia and major depression.

    Mike Rinck;Eni S. Becker

  • Speeded detection and increased distraction in fear of spiders: evidence from eye movements.

    Mike Rinck;Andrea Reinecke;Thomas Ellwart;Kathrin Heuer

  • Worry Exposure versus Applied Relaxation in the Treatment of Generalized Anxiety Disorder

    Jürgen Hoyer;Katja Beesdo;Andrew T. Gloster;Juliane Runge

  • Relapse prevention in abstinent alcoholics by cognitive bias modification: Clinical effects of combining approach bias modification and attention bias modification

    Mike Rinck;Reinout W Wiers;Eni S Becker;Johannes Lindenmeyer

  • Don’t Worry and Beware of White Bears: Thought Suppression in Anxiety Patients

    Eni S. Becker;Mike Rinck;Walton T. Roth;Jürgen Margraf

  • Avoidance, safety behavior, and reassurance seeking in generalized anxiety disorder.

    Katja Beesdo-Baum;Elsa Jenjahn;Michael Höfler;Ulrike Lueken

  • Selective attention in anxiety: Distraction and enhancement in visual search

    Mike Rinck;Eni S. Becker;Jana Kellermann;Walton T. Roth;Walton T. Roth

  • Validating the Beck Depression Inventory-II in Indonesia's general population and coronary heart disease patients

    Henndy Ginting;Henndy Ginting;Gérard Näring;William M. van der Veld;Wilis Srisayekti

  • A specific attentional bias in suicide attempters.

    Eni S. Becker;Dorlit Strohbach;Mike Rinck

Frequent Co-Authors

Anne E. M. Speckens
Anne E. M. Speckens Radboud University
Ger P. J. Keijsers
Ger P. J. Keijsers Radboud University
Jürgen Margraf
Jürgen Margraf Ruhr University Bochum
Mike Rinck
Mike Rinck Radboud University
Reinout W. Wiers
Reinout W. Wiers University of Amsterdam
Indira Tendolkar
Indira Tendolkar Radboud University
Guillén Fernández
Guillén Fernández Radboud University
Jürgen Hoyer
Jürgen Hoyer TU Dresden
Jasper A. J. Smits
Jasper A. J. Smits The University of Texas at Austin
Barbara Franke
Barbara Franke Radboud University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA can open the door to many rewarding careers, especially in related fields that focus on communication, development, and well-being. One popular pathway is becoming a Speech-Language Pathologist (SLP). This career blends psychology, linguistics, and healthcare, making it an excellent option for those interested in both science and helping others.

Pursuing an online degree in psychology, communication sciences, or related areas can be the first step toward an SLP career. However, each state has its own licensing and certification requirements for speech-language pathologists. For example, in Connecticut, you must meet the Connecticut slp certification requirements. Delaware has its own unique Delaware speech pathologist certification requirements that must be followed.

If you’re planning to work in the Southeast, it’s important to review the Florida speech pathologist certification requirements and Georgia speech pathologist certification requirements as well. These state-specific guidelines ensure that professionals have the proper training and credentials. As you explore online degree programs, consider how your studies align with the certification requirements in your intended state of practice.

Best Scientists Citing Eni S. Becker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles