World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 36 9445 8828 412 398 169 6583

Elske Salemink publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Elske Salemink between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Elske Salemink published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 8.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2017. 31 of the 207 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2017. 2001: 2 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 4 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 18 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 18 publications
2001 2025

207 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Elske Salemink: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 2
2002 0
2003 0
2004 0
2005 1
2006 1
2007 4
2008 0
2009 5
2010 7
2011 2
2012 3
2013 10
2014 12
2015 18
2016 11
2017 19
2018 17
2019 12
2020 14
2021 16
2022 7
2023 15
2024 13
2025 18
Total 207
Download as CSV

Elske Salemink publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elske Salemink sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–170 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 169 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477 169
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Elske Salemink D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elske Salemink sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 36
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Elske Salemink is affiliated with Utrecht University in the Netherlands. Their research primarily spans the field of Psychology, with a focus on experimental and cognitive psychology, clinical psychology, applied psychology, social psychology, and cognitive neuroscience.

The main topics covered in Salemink's work include:

  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access

Salemink has collaborated frequently with several coauthors. The most common include:

  • Reínout W. Wiers
  • Pim Cuijpers
  • Iris M. Engelhard
  • Sascha Y. Struijs
  • Eirini Karyotaki

Their recent papers illustrate a range of research interests and publication venues. Selected papers are:

  • "Fear of the coronavirus (COVID-19): Predictors in an online study conducted in March 2020," 2020, Journal of Anxiety Disorders
  • "Prevention and treatment of mental health and psychosocial problems in college students: An umbrella review of meta-analyses," 2021, Clinical Psychology Science and Practice
  • "Modification of hostile attribution bias reduces self-reported reactive aggressive behavior in adolescents," 2020, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
  • "Does comorbid anxiety or depression moderate effects of approach bias modification in the treatment of alcohol use disorders?," 2021, Psychology of Addictive Behaviors
  • "Gamification of cognitive bias modification for interpretations in anxiety increases training engagement and enjoyment," 2022, Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry

Salemink's publications appear regularly in several journals, with the most frequent being:

  • Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy
  • Cognitive Therapy and Research
  • JMIR Formative Research
  • Child Psychiatry & Human Development

Best Publications

  • Fear of the coronavirus (COVID-19): Predictors in an online study conducted in March 2020.

    Gaëtan Mertens;Gaëtan Mertens;Lotte Gerritsen;Stefanie Duijndam;Elske Salemink

  • Cognitive Bias Modification and Cognitive Control Training in Addiction and Related Psychopathology: Mechanisms, Clinical Perspectives, and Ways Forward

    Reinout W. Wiers;Thomas E. Gladwin;Wilhelm Hofmann;Elske Salemink

  • Autobiographical memories become less vivid and emotional after eye movements

    Marcel van den Hout;Peter Muris;Elske Salemink;Merel Kindt

  • Selective attention and threat: quick orienting versus slow disengagement and two versions of the dot probe task.

    Elske Salemink;Marcel A. van den Hout;Merel Kindt

  • Effects of positive interpretive bias modification in highly anxious individuals.

    Elske Salemink;Marcel van den Hout;Merel Kindt

  • A review of cognitive biases in youth depression: attention, interpretation and memory

    Belinda Platt;Allison M. Waters;Gerd Schulte-Koerne;Lina Engelmann

  • Ruminative coping as avoidance: a reinterpretation of its function in adjustment to bereavement

    Margaret Stroebe;Paul A Boelen;Marcel van den Hout;Wolfgang Stroebe

  • Efficacy and safety of high-dose baclofen for the treatment of alcohol dependence: A multicentre, randomised, double-blind controlled trial.

    Esther M. Beraha;Elske Salemink;Anna E. Goudriaan;Abraham Bakker

  • Confusing procedures with process when appraising the impact of cognitive bias modification on emotional vulnerability

    Ben Grafton;Colin MacLeod;Daniel Rudaizky;Emily A. Holmes;Emily A. Holmes

  • Visual search attentional bias modification reduced social phobia in adolescents

    E.L. De Voogd;R.W. Wiers;P.J.M. Prins;E. Salemink

  • Trained interpretive bias and anxiety.

    Elske Salemink;Marcel van den Hout;Merel Kindt

  • Association between attention bias to threat and anxiety symptoms in children and adolescents.

    Rany Abend;Leone de Voogd;Elske Salemink;Reinout W. Wiers

  • Trained interpretive bias: validity and effects on anxiety.

    Elske Salemink;Marcel van den Hout;Merel Kindt

  • Modifying threat-related interpretive bias in adolescents.

    Elske Salemink;Reinout W. Wiers

  • Alcohol-related memory associations in positive and negative affect situations: Drinking motives, working memory capacity, and prospective drinking

    Elske Salemink;Reinout W. Wiers

  • Internet-based cognitive bias modification of interpretations in patients with anxiety disorders: a randomised controlled trial.

    Elske Salemink;Merel Kindt;Henk Rienties;Marcel van den Hout

  • Online attentional bias modification training targeting anxiety and depression in unselected adolescents: Short- and long-term effects of a randomized controlled trial

    E.L. de Voogd;R.W. Wiers;P.J.M. Prins;P.J. de Jong

  • Adolescent threat-related interpretive bias and its modification: the moderating role of regulatory control.

    Elske Salemink;Reinout W. Wiers

  • The Effects of Increasing Neutral Distraction on Sexual Responding of Women With and Without Sexual Problems

    Elske Salemink;Jacques J. D. M. van Lankveld

  • Interpretation training influences memory for prior interpretations.

    Elske Salemink;Paula T Hertel;Bundy Mackintosh

  • Mindfulness-based interventions

    B. Van Bockstaele;E. Salemink;B.D. Ostafin;A.M. Meijer

Frequent Co-Authors

Reinout W. Wiers
Reinout W. Wiers University of Amsterdam
Marcel A. van den Hout
Marcel A. van den Hout Utrecht University
Susan M. Bögels
Susan M. Bögels University of Amsterdam
Colin MacLeod
Colin MacLeod University of Western Australia
Merel Kindt
Merel Kindt University of Amsterdam
Giovanni Abrahão Salum
Giovanni Abrahão Salum Child Mind Institute
Hilde M. Huizenga
Hilde M. Huizenga University of Amsterdam
Gerd Schulte-Körne
Gerd Schulte-Körne Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Bruno Verschuere
Bruno Verschuere University of Amsterdam
Pim Cuijpers
Pim Cuijpers Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology degree in the USA opens diverse online learning and career opportunities. Many students choose to specialize in fields such as marriage and family therapy (MFT), often seeking fully online master's programs to balance studies with work and life commitments.

Licensing and certification differ by state, and it’s important to be aware of local requirements. For example, you can learn more about Minneapolis mft education requirements if you plan to practice in Minnesota. Aspiring therapists in Tennessee should explore the steps for how to become an mft in Nashville.

Other regions have their own rules, such as licensing criteria and supervised clinical hours. Check the details for New Orleans mft education requirements and review New York City mft certification requirements if you plan to work in Louisiana or New York.

Understanding these requirements helps you choose the right online degree or credential and plan a successful pathway in the rewarding field of psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Elske Salemink

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles