World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
34
Citations
5205
World Ranking
10184
National Ranking
450

Hilde M. Huizenga publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hilde M. Huizenga sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 120 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Hilde M. Huizenga D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hilde M. Huizenga sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Hilde M. Huizenga is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands and specializes in psychology, with a focus on experimental and cognitive psychology, cognitive neuroscience, clinical psychology, applied psychology, and developmental and educational psychology. Their research spans a range of topics including behavioral health and interventions, decision-making and behavioral economics, neural and behavioral psychology studies, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, child and animal learning development, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and education, achievement, and giftedness.

The scientist has contributed to multiple publication venues with frequent appearances in the Journal of Experimental Child Psychology and Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, each featuring three of their works. They have also published in the Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, Decision, and Research Square.

Frequent collaborators include Jessica V. Schaaf, Anna C. K. van Duijvenvoorde, Tycho J. Dekkers, Brenda R. J. Jansen, and Ingmar Visser, with collaboration counts ranging from nine to twelve papers each.

Some of their recent papers are:

  • The Factor Structure of Cognitive Functioning in Cognitively Healthy Participants: a Meta-Analysis and Meta-Analysis of Individual Participant Data (2020, Neuropsychology Review)
  • Development and socialization of self-regulation from infancy to adolescence: A meta-review differentiating between self-regulatory abilities, goals, and motivation (2023, Developmental Review)
  • Uncertainty-driven regulation of learning and exploration in adolescents: A computational account (2020, PLoS Computational Biology)
  • Individual differences in adolescents' willingness to invest cognitive effort: Relation to need for cognition, motivation and cognitive capacity (2020, Cognitive Development)
  • When Do those "Risk-Taking Adolescents" Take Risks? The Combined Effects of Risk Encouragement by Peers, Mild-to-Borderline Intellectual Disability and Sex (2020, Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology)

Their work encompasses analysis of cognitive functioning across healthy populations, the development and differentiation of self-regulation abilities throughout childhood and adolescence, computational models of learning and exploration in adolescents, and investigations into cognitive motivation and risk-taking behavior in youth.

Best Publications

  • A dynamical model of general intelligence: the positive manifold of intelligence by mutualism.

    Han L. J. Van Der Maas;Conor V. Dolan;Raoul P. P. P. Grasman;Jelte M. Wicherts

  • The Relationship Between the Structure of Interindividual and Intraindividual Variability: A Theoretical and Empirical Vindication of Developmental Systems Theory

    Peter C. M. Molenaar;Hilde M. Huizenga;John R. Nesselroade

  • Predictors of cognitive and psychosocial outcome after STN DBS in Parkinson's Disease

    Harriet M M Smeding;Johannes D Speelman;Hilde M Huizenga;P Richard Schuurman

  • Decision-making in healthy children, adolescents and adults explained by the use of increasingly complex proportional reasoning rules.

    Hilde M. Huizenga;Eveline A. Crone;Brenda J. Jansen

  • Neural Correlates of Expected Risks and Returns in Risky Choice across Development

    Anna C. K. van Duijvenvoorde;Anna C. K. van Duijvenvoorde;Hilde M. Huizenga;Leah H. Somerville;Mauricio R. Delgado

  • Affective and Cognitive Decision-Making in Adolescents

    Anna C K van Duijvenvoorde;Brenda R J Jansen;Ingmar Visser;Hilde M Huizenga

  • A meta-analytical evaluation of the dual-hormone hypothesis: Does cortisol moderate the relationship between testosterone and status, dominance, risk taking, aggression, and psychopathy?

    Tycho J. Dekkers;Joost A. Agelink van Rentergem;Joost A. Agelink van Rentergem;Bren Meijer;Arne Popma;Arne Popma

  • Meta-analysis of CSF and MRI biomarkers for detecting preclinical Alzheimer's disease.

    B. Schmand;H. M. Huizenga;W. A. van Gool

  • Risky decision making in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A meta-regression analysis

    Tycho J. Dekkers;Arne Popma;Joost A. Agelink van Rentergem;Anika Bexkens

  • Risk-Taking Behavior in Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): a Review of Potential Underlying Mechanisms and of Interventions.

    Yehuda Pollak;Tycho J Dekkers;Rachel Shoham;Hilde M Huizenga

  • Age-related changes in decision making: comparing informed and noninformed situations.

    Anna C. K. Van Duijvenvoorde;Brenda R. J. Jansen;Joren C. Bredman;Hilde M. Huizenga

  • Testing overall and moderator effects in random effects meta-regression.

    Hilde M. Huizenga;Ingmar Visser;Conor V. Dolan

  • Profiling Fragile X Syndrome in Males: Strengths and weaknesses in cognitive abilities

    M.J.W. Van der Molen;M. Huizinga;H.M. Huizenga;K.R. Ridderinkhof

  • Multivariate normative comparisons

    Hilde M. Huizenga;Harriet Smeding;Raoul P.P.P. Grasman;Ben Schmand

  • Development of decision making: sequential versus integrative rules.

    Brenda R.J. Jansen;Anna C.K. van Duijvenvoorde;Hilde M. Huizenga

  • Four empirical tests of Unconscious Thought Theory

    Hilde M. Huizenga;Ruud Wetzels;Don van Ravenzwaaij;Eric-Jan Wagenmakers

  • Inhibition deficits in individuals with intellectual disability: a meta-regression analysis

    A. Bexkens;L. Ruzzano;A. M. L. Collot d' Escury-Koenigs;M. W. Van der Molen

  • Effects of methylphenidate on executive functioning in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder across the lifespan: a meta-regression analysis.

    H.G.H. Tamminga;L. Reneman;H.M. Huizenga;H.M. Geurts

  • Response to the Correction by Spencer-Smith and Klingberg: Unaddressed Concerns

    S. Dovis;J. Agelink van Rentergem;H.M. Huizenga

  • Dopamine agonists and the suppression of impulsive motor actions in parkinson disease

    Scott A. Wylie;Daniel O. Claassen;Hilde M. Huizenga;Kerilyn D. Schewel

Frequent Co-Authors

Lourens J. Waldorp
Lourens J. Waldorp University of Amsterdam
Peter C. M. Molenaar
Peter C. M. Molenaar Pennsylvania State University
Arne Popma
Arne Popma University of Amsterdam
Ben Schmand
Ben Schmand University of Amsterdam
Maurits W. van der Molen
Maurits W. van der Molen University of Amsterdam
Wery P. M. van den Wildenberg
Wery P. M. van den Wildenberg University of Amsterdam
Koen B.E. Böcker
Koen B.E. Böcker Utrecht University
Elske Salemink
Elske Salemink Utrecht University
Conor V. Dolan
Conor V. Dolan Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens doors to multiple career pathways beyond traditional roles. Many students use a psychology background as a starting point for specialized professions, such as social work, counseling, or behavioral analysis. These options offer the flexibility to study while gaining practical skills critical for real-world impact.

Becoming a social worker is a popular career trajectory for psychology graduates. However, the requirements can differ based on your chosen state. For insights into specific state requirements, explore guides like how to become a social worker in Rhode Island, how to become a social worker in South Carolina, and how to become a social worker in South Dakota. Each of these highlights regional licensure steps, required credentials, and essential skills.

If you plan to practice in another state, such as Tennessee, be sure to review Tennessee social work license requirements as well. Thoroughly researching these pathways can help you select the right online program and prepare for the unique demands of your desired career.

Best Scientists Citing Hilde M. Huizenga

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles