World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Peter C. M. Molenaar publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peter C. M. Molenaar between 1970 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peter C. M. Molenaar published across 56 years, from 1970 to 2025, averaging 5.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2020. 16 of the 297 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1970 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2020. 1970: 1 publication 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 2 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 1 publication 1978: 1 publication 1979: 2 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 3 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 3 publications 1985: 5 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 9 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 8 publications 1991: 7 publications 1992: 12 publications 1993: 9 publications 1994: 11 publications 1995: 11 publications 1996: 12 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 10 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 9 publications
1970 2025

297 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peter C. M. Molenaar: publications per year, 1970 to 2025
Year Publications
1970 1
1971 0
1972 0
1973 2
1974 0
1975 0
1976 1
1977 1
1978 1
1979 2
1980 1
1981 3
1982 2
1983 1
1984 3
1985 5
1986 3
1987 9
1988 5
1989 4
1990 8
1991 7
1992 12
1993 9
1994 11
1995 11
1996 12
1997 3
1998 9
1999 10
2000 6
2001 6
2002 3
2003 7
2004 4
2005 4
2006 3
2007 7
2008 2
2009 6
2010 8
2011 7
2012 2
2013 7
2014 11
2015 8
2016 5
2017 10
2018 4
2019 4
2020 14
2021 9
2022 5
2023 3
2024 7
2025 9
Total 297
Download as CSV

Peter C. M. Molenaar publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter C. M. Molenaar sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Peter C. M. Molenaar D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter C. M. Molenaar sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Peter C. M. Molenaar is affiliated with Pennsylvania State University in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields within medicine and biomedical science, with a strong focus on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, neurology, and surgery. The scientist's work also contributes to areas such as molecular biology and pathology and forensic medicine.

The main fields of study associated with their publications include:

  • Medicine
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

More specifically, their subfields of study consist of:

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Neurology
  • Surgery
  • Molecular Biology
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Key topics covered in their research are:

  • Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
  • Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
  • Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
  • Autoimmune Neurological Disorders and Treatments
  • Ion channel regulation and function
  • Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
  • Frontiers in Immunology
  • Heart Lung and Circulation
  • Autoimmunity Reviews
  • Cell

Some recent notable papers authored or co-authored by Peter C. M. Molenaar are:

  • Identification of Key Small Non-Coding MicroRNAs Controlling Pacemaker Mechanisms in the Human Sinus Node, 2020, Journal of the American Heart Association
  • Further insights into the molecular complexity of the human sinus node - The role of 'novel' transcription factors and microRNAs, 2021, Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology
  • Sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium mishandling: central tenet in heart failure?, 2020, Biophysical Reviews
  • Conserved Role of the Large Conductance Calcium-Activated Potassium Channel, K Ca 1.1, in Sinus Node Function and Arrhythmia Risk, 2021, Circulation Genomic and Precision Medicine
  • Novel treatment strategies for acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive myasthenia gravis and related disorders, 2022, Autoimmunity Reviews

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Pilar Martínez-Martínez
  • Marina Mané-Damas
  • Elizabeth Cheesman
  • Haris M. Haqqani
  • Louise E. See Hoe

Best Publications

  • Acquired neuromyotonia: evidence for autoantibodies directed against K+ channels of peripheral nerves.

    Paul Shillito;Peter C. Molenaar;Angela Vincent;Angela Vincent;Katherine Leys

  • Molecular Architecture of the Human Sinus Node: Insights Into the Function of the Cardiac Pacemaker

    Natalie J. Chandler;Ian D. Greener;James O. Tellez;Shin Inada

  • Group search algorithm recovers effective connectivity maps for individuals in homogeneous and heterogeneous samples.

    Kathleen M. Gates;Peter C.M. Molenaar

  • Abnormal myotonic dystrophy protein kinase levels produce only mild myopathy in mice

    Gert Jansen;P.J.T.A. Groenen;D. Bächner;P.H.K. Jap

  • Characterization and localization of endothelin receptor subtypes in the human atrioventricular conducting system and myocardium.

    P Molenaar;G O'Reilly;A Sharkey;R E Kuc

  • The Relationship Between the Structure of Interindividual and Intraindividual Variability: A Theoretical and Empirical Vindication of Developmental Systems Theory

    Peter C. M. Molenaar;Hilde M. Huizenga;John R. Nesselroade

  • Monoclonal antibodies raised against Guillain-Barré syndrome–associated Campylobacter jejuni lipopolysaccharides react with neuronal gangliosides and paralyze muscle-nerve preparations

    Carl S. Goodyear;Graham M. O’Hanlon;Jaap J. Plomp;Eric R. Wagner

  • The integrated trait–state model

    Ellen L. Hamaker;John R. Nesselroade;Peter C.M. Molenaar

  • Heritability of human brain functioning as assessed by electroencephalography

    C. E. M. Van Beijsterveldt;P. C. M. Molenaar;E. J. C. De Geus;D. I. Boomsma

  • Modulation of human cardiac function through 4 beta-adrenoceptor populations.

    A. J. Kaumann;Peter Molenaar

  • On the implications of the classical ergodic theorems: analysis of developmental processes has to focus on intra-individual variation.

    Peter C.M. Molenaar

  • Stochastic processes in postural center-of-pressure profiles

    K. M. Newell;S. M. Slobounov;E. S. Slobounova;P. C. M. Molenaar;P. C. M. Molenaar

  • Miller Fisher anti-GQ1b antibodies: alpha-latrotoxin-like effects on motor end plates.

    J. J. Plomp;P. C. Molenaar;G. M. O'hanlon;B. C. Jacobs

  • A third source of developmental differences

    Peter C. M. Molenaar;Dorret I. Boomsma;Conor V. Dolan

  • Adaptation of quantal content to decreased postsynaptic sensitivity at single endplates in alpha-bungarotoxin-treated rats.

    J. J. Plomp;G. T. H. Van Kempen;P. C. Molenaar

  • Automatic search for fMRI connectivity mapping: An alternative to Granger causality testing using formal equivalences among SEM path modeling, VAR, and unified SEM

    Kathleen M. Gates;Peter Molenaar;Frank Gerard Hillary;Nilam Ram

  • Anti-GQ1b ganglioside antibodies mediate complement-dependent destruction of the motor nerve terminal

    Graham M. O'Hanlon;Jaap J. Plomp;Mahua Chakrabarti;Ian Morrison

  • Cardiostimulant effects of urotensin‐II in human heart in vitro

    Fraser D Russell;Peter Molenaar;Donalee M O'Brien

  • Differences between the third cardiac β-adrenoceptor and the colonic β3-adrenoceptor in the rat

    Alberto J. Kaumann;Peter Molenaar

  • A framework for the unification of the behavioral sciences. Commentaries. Author's reply

    Herbert Gintis;George Ainslie;Larry Arnhart;R. Alexander Bentley

Frequent Co-Authors

Roger J. Summers
Roger J. Summers Monash University
Conor V. Dolan
Conor V. Dolan Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Dorret I. Boomsma
Dorret I. Boomsma Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Jaap J. Plomp
Jaap J. Plomp Leiden University Medical Center
Angela Vincent
Angela Vincent University of Oxford
Hilde M. Huizenga
Hilde M. Huizenga University of Amsterdam
John R. Nesselroade
John R. Nesselroade University of Virginia
Nilam Ram
Nilam Ram Stanford University
Karl M. Newell
Karl M. Newell University of Georgia
Han L. J. van der Maas
Han L. J. van der Maas University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a career in medicine, there are many alternative and related online degree options that can help you explore the healthcare field or advance your current role. One common pathway is nursing; however, many prospective students wonder: do all nursing schools require the TEAS? In fact, some nursing schools waive this requirement, offering more flexible admission options.

If leadership interests you, consider pursuing the best online healthcare administration degree. This path prepares you for management roles in hospitals, clinics, and public health organizations. Similarly, registered nurses seeking advanced practice can benefit from ASN to FNP programs, which bridge existing credentials to a Family Nurse Practitioner degree.

For those interested in wellness or preventative medicine, the best online nutrition degree can open doors to meaningful careers in both clinical and non-clinical settings. Each of these degrees offers flexible online options, making it easier to balance your studies with your current responsibilities.

Best Scientists Citing Peter C. M. Molenaar

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles