World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Peter C. M. Molenaar publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter C. M. Molenaar sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Peter C. M. Molenaar D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter C. M. Molenaar sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter C. M. Molenaar is affiliated with Pennsylvania State University in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields within medicine and biomedical science, with a strong focus on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, neurology, and surgery. The scientist's work also contributes to areas such as molecular biology and pathology and forensic medicine.

The main fields of study associated with their publications include:

  • Medicine
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

More specifically, their subfields of study consist of:

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Neurology
  • Surgery
  • Molecular Biology
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Key topics covered in their research are:

  • Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
  • Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
  • Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
  • Autoimmune Neurological Disorders and Treatments
  • Ion channel regulation and function
  • Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
  • Frontiers in Immunology
  • Heart Lung and Circulation
  • Autoimmunity Reviews
  • Cell

Some recent notable papers authored or co-authored by Peter C. M. Molenaar are:

  • Identification of Key Small Non-Coding MicroRNAs Controlling Pacemaker Mechanisms in the Human Sinus Node, 2020, Journal of the American Heart Association
  • Further insights into the molecular complexity of the human sinus node - The role of 'novel' transcription factors and microRNAs, 2021, Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology
  • Sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium mishandling: central tenet in heart failure?, 2020, Biophysical Reviews
  • Conserved Role of the Large Conductance Calcium-Activated Potassium Channel, K Ca 1.1, in Sinus Node Function and Arrhythmia Risk, 2021, Circulation Genomic and Precision Medicine
  • Novel treatment strategies for acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive myasthenia gravis and related disorders, 2022, Autoimmunity Reviews

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Pilar Martínez-Martínez
  • Marina Mané-Damas
  • Elizabeth Cheesman
  • Haris M. Haqqani
  • Louise E. See Hoe

Best Publications

  • Acquired neuromyotonia: evidence for autoantibodies directed against K+ channels of peripheral nerves.

    Paul Shillito;Peter C. Molenaar;Angela Vincent;Angela Vincent;Katherine Leys

  • Molecular Architecture of the Human Sinus Node: Insights Into the Function of the Cardiac Pacemaker

    Natalie J. Chandler;Ian D. Greener;James O. Tellez;Shin Inada

  • Group search algorithm recovers effective connectivity maps for individuals in homogeneous and heterogeneous samples.

    Kathleen M. Gates;Peter C.M. Molenaar

  • Abnormal myotonic dystrophy protein kinase levels produce only mild myopathy in mice

    Gert Jansen;P.J.T.A. Groenen;D. Bächner;P.H.K. Jap

  • Characterization and localization of endothelin receptor subtypes in the human atrioventricular conducting system and myocardium.

    P Molenaar;G O'Reilly;A Sharkey;R E Kuc

  • The Relationship Between the Structure of Interindividual and Intraindividual Variability: A Theoretical and Empirical Vindication of Developmental Systems Theory

    Peter C. M. Molenaar;Hilde M. Huizenga;John R. Nesselroade

  • Monoclonal antibodies raised against Guillain-Barré syndrome–associated Campylobacter jejuni lipopolysaccharides react with neuronal gangliosides and paralyze muscle-nerve preparations

    Carl S. Goodyear;Graham M. O’Hanlon;Jaap J. Plomp;Eric R. Wagner

  • The integrated trait–state model

    Ellen L. Hamaker;John R. Nesselroade;Peter C.M. Molenaar

  • Heritability of human brain functioning as assessed by electroencephalography

    C. E. M. Van Beijsterveldt;P. C. M. Molenaar;E. J. C. De Geus;D. I. Boomsma

  • Modulation of human cardiac function through 4 beta-adrenoceptor populations.

    A. J. Kaumann;Peter Molenaar

  • On the implications of the classical ergodic theorems: analysis of developmental processes has to focus on intra-individual variation.

    Peter C.M. Molenaar

  • Stochastic processes in postural center-of-pressure profiles

    K. M. Newell;S. M. Slobounov;E. S. Slobounova;P. C. M. Molenaar;P. C. M. Molenaar

  • Miller Fisher anti-GQ1b antibodies: alpha-latrotoxin-like effects on motor end plates.

    J. J. Plomp;P. C. Molenaar;G. M. O'hanlon;B. C. Jacobs

  • A third source of developmental differences

    Peter C. M. Molenaar;Dorret I. Boomsma;Conor V. Dolan

  • Adaptation of quantal content to decreased postsynaptic sensitivity at single endplates in alpha-bungarotoxin-treated rats.

    J. J. Plomp;G. T. H. Van Kempen;P. C. Molenaar

  • Automatic search for fMRI connectivity mapping: An alternative to Granger causality testing using formal equivalences among SEM path modeling, VAR, and unified SEM

    Kathleen M. Gates;Peter Molenaar;Frank Gerard Hillary;Nilam Ram

  • Anti-GQ1b ganglioside antibodies mediate complement-dependent destruction of the motor nerve terminal

    Graham M. O'Hanlon;Jaap J. Plomp;Mahua Chakrabarti;Ian Morrison

  • Cardiostimulant effects of urotensin‐II in human heart in vitro

    Fraser D Russell;Peter Molenaar;Donalee M O'Brien

  • Differences between the third cardiac β-adrenoceptor and the colonic β3-adrenoceptor in the rat

    Alberto J. Kaumann;Peter Molenaar

  • A framework for the unification of the behavioral sciences. Commentaries. Author's reply

    Herbert Gintis;George Ainslie;Larry Arnhart;R. Alexander Bentley

Frequent Co-Authors

Roger J. Summers
Roger J. Summers Monash University
Conor V. Dolan
Conor V. Dolan Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Dorret I. Boomsma
Dorret I. Boomsma Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Jaap J. Plomp
Jaap J. Plomp Leiden University Medical Center
Angela Vincent
Angela Vincent University of Oxford
Hilde M. Huizenga
Hilde M. Huizenga University of Amsterdam
John R. Nesselroade
John R. Nesselroade University of Virginia
Nilam Ram
Nilam Ram Stanford University
Karl M. Newell
Karl M. Newell University of Georgia
Han L. J. van der Maas
Han L. J. van der Maas University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a career in medicine, there are many alternative and related online degree options that can help you explore the healthcare field or advance your current role. One common pathway is nursing; however, many prospective students wonder: do all nursing schools require the TEAS? In fact, some nursing schools waive this requirement, offering more flexible admission options.

If leadership interests you, consider pursuing the best online healthcare administration degree. This path prepares you for management roles in hospitals, clinics, and public health organizations. Similarly, registered nurses seeking advanced practice can benefit from ASN to FNP programs, which bridge existing credentials to a Family Nurse Practitioner degree.

For those interested in wellness or preventative medicine, the best online nutrition degree can open doors to meaningful careers in both clinical and non-clinical settings. Each of these degrees offers flexible online options, making it easier to balance your studies with your current responsibilities.

Best Scientists Citing Peter C. M. Molenaar

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles