World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
65
Citations
19765
World Ranking
2805
National Ranking
1622

John F. Kihlstrom publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John F. Kihlstrom sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 265 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

John F. Kihlstrom D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John F. Kihlstrom sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1991 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 1982 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

John F. Kihlstrom is affiliated with the University of California, Berkeley in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on neuroscience and psychology. Within these disciplines, they have contributed extensively to cognitive neuroscience, general psychology, applied psychology, and clinical psychology, as well as topics related to food science.

Their work covers several main topics including pain management and the placebo effect, academic and historical perspectives in psychology, psychological testing and assessment, sensory analysis and statistical methods, mental health research topics, olfactory and sensory function studies, and complementary and alternative medicine studies.

John F. Kihlstrom has published papers across a variety of academic journals. Recent notable publications include:

  • "Ecological Validity and 'Ecological Validity'" (2021) in Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • "Placebo: Feeling Better, Getting Better, and the Problems of Mind and Body" (2020) in McGill Journal of Medicine
  • "Consciousness, the unconscious, and the self." (2021) in Psychology of Consciousness Theory Research and Practice
  • "Hypnotizability in the Clinic, Viewed from the Laboratory" (2023) in International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis
  • "Recognition in Posthypnotic Amnesia, Revisited" (2021) in International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis

Frequent publication venues for John F. Kihlstrom include:

  • Psychology of Consciousness Theory Research and Practice
  • International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis
  • Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • McGill Journal of Medicine
  • Journal of Consciousness Studies

John F. Kihlstrom's contributions to their fields have been recognized with several awards. They are a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA), awarded in 1982, and a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), recognized in 1991.

Best Publications

  • The cognitive unconscious

    John F. Kihlstrom

  • Personality and social intelligence

    Nancy Cantor;John F Kihlstrom

  • Memory and Temporal Experience: the Effects of Episodic Memory Loss on an Amnesic Patient's Ability to Remember the Past and Imagine the Future

    Stanley B. Klein;Judith Loftus;John F. Kihlstrom

  • Personality, Cognition and Social Interaction

    Nancy Cantor;John F. Kihlstrom

  • Mental Representations of the Self

    John F. Kihlstrom;Nancy Cantor

  • Explorations in behavioral consistency: properties of persons, situations, and behaviors.

    David C. Funder;C. Randall Colvin

  • STANFORD HYPNOTIC SUSCEPTIBILITY SCALE, FORM C

    Andre M. Weitzenhoffer;Ernest R. Hilgard;John F. Kihlstrom

  • Elaboration, organization, and the self-reference effect in memory.

    Stanley B. Klein;John F. Kihlstrom

  • The psychological unconscious. Found, lost, and regained.

    John F. Kihlstrom;Terrence M. Barnhardt;Douglas J. Tataryn

  • Unpredictable and uncontrollable events: a new perspective on experimental neurosis.

    Susan Mineka;John F. Kihlstrom

  • The self as a knowledge structure.

    John F. Kihlstrom;Stanley B. Klein

  • Self-knowledge of an amnesic patient: toward a neuropsychology of personality and social psychology

    Stanley B. Klein;Judith Loftus;John F. Kihlstrom

  • Information processing and the study of the self

    John F. Kihlstrom;Jeanne Sumi Albright;Stanley B. Klein;Nancy Cantor

  • The relation between source memory and aging.

    Daniel L. Schacter;Alfred W. Kaszniak;John F. Kihlstrom;Michael Valdiserri

  • Functional Disorders of Memory

    James R. Misanin;John F. Kihlstrom;Fredrick J. Evans

  • Self and identity as memory

    John F. Kihlstrom;Jennifer S. Beer;Stanley B. Klein

  • Dissociative tendencies and dissociative disorders

    John F. Kihlstrom;Martha L. Glisky;Michael J. Angiulo

  • The Emotional Unconscious

    John F. Kihlstrom;Shelagh Mulvaney;Betsy A. Tobias;Irene P. Tobis

  • The psychological unconscious.

    John F. Kihlstrom

  • The earliest recollection: A new survey

    John F. Kihlstrom;Judith M. Harackiewicz

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel L. Schacter
Daniel L. Schacter Harvard University
Stanley B. Klein
Stanley B. Klein University of California, Santa Barbara
Nancy Cantor
Nancy Cantor Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Alfred W. Kaszniak
Alfred W. Kaszniak University of Arizona
Mary A. Peterson
Mary A. Peterson University of Arizona
Paula M. Niedenthal
Paula M. Niedenthal University of Wisconsin–Madison
Judith M. Harackiewicz
Judith M. Harackiewicz University of Wisconsin–Madison
Ernest R. Hilgard
Ernest R. Hilgard Stanford University
Richard R. Bootzin
Richard R. Bootzin University of Arizona
Reid Hastie
Reid Hastie University of Chicago

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens up a variety of career opportunities. Whether you are interested in counseling, clinical work, or research, online programs offer flexibility and accessibility for students across the country. Many universities offer fully online programs tailored to diverse interests and schedules, making psychology education more reachable than ever.

Choosing the right program also depends on your location and career goals. For instance, students in the Southeast might consider popular psychology degrees in Nashville for strong opportunities in mental health services. Those in the Midwest can look at the best-ranked psychology degree programs in Oklahoma for top academic outcomes.

The South and West also offer promising options: explore popular psychology programs in Orlando for programs connected to a large mental health ecosystem, or review popular psychology degrees in Reno for unique specializations and robust online offerings. Graduates can pursue roles in education, social work, research, and healthcare, making the field both dynamic and rewarding.

Best Scientists Citing John F. Kihlstrom

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles