World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
66
Citations
22044
World Ranking
2663
National Ranking
1534

Paula M. Niedenthal publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paula M. Niedenthal sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 197 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Paula M. Niedenthal D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paula M. Niedenthal sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paula M. Niedenthal is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. Their research spans multiple facets within the disciplines of psychology and neuroscience, focusing particularly on social and cognitive processes related to emotion and behavior.

Their publication record includes contributions to prominent journals, with recent papers covering diverse topics such as affective processes, social structure, facial signaling, and emotion recognition. Notable works include:

  • The rise of affectivism (2021), published in Nature Human Behaviour
  • Social Structure Predicts Eye Contact Tolerance in Nonhuman Primates: Evidence from a Crowd-Sourcing Approach (2020), published in Scientific Reports
  • Evidence for Distinct Facial Signals of Reward, Affiliation, and Dominance from Both Perception and Production Tasks (2021), published in Affective Science
  • Wearing N95, Surgical, and Cloth Face Masks Compromises the Perception of Emotion (2022), published in Affective Science
  • Exploring the Relationship Between Fiction Reading and Emotion Recognition (2021), published in Affective Science

The scientist frequently collaborates with researchers including Jared Martin, Fangyun Zhao, Adrienne Wood, Andrew T. Langbehn, and Ethan G. Harrod. These collaborations reflect ongoing research interests in the nuanced understanding of emotional and social communication.

Key publication venues where their work appears include:

  • Affective Science
  • Emotion
  • Research Square
  • Nature Human Behaviour
  • Scientific Reports

Paula M. Niedenthal's main fields of study are psychology and neuroscience. Within these disciplines, they focus on several subfields, including social psychology, cognitive neuroscience, experimental and cognitive psychology, sociology and political science, and general health professions.

The main topics covered in their work encompass:

  • Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Child and Animal Learning Development

Best Publications

  • Embodiment in Attitudes, Social Perception, and Emotion

    Paula M. Niedenthal;Lawrence W. Barsalou;Piotr Winkielman;Silvia Krauth-Gruber

  • Embodying Emotion

    Unknown

  • "If only I weren't" versus "if only I hadn't": distinguishing shame and guilt in counterfactual thinking.

    Paula M. Niedenthal;June Price Tangney;Igor Gavanski

  • The Simulation of Smiles (SIMS) model: Embodied simulation and the meaning of facial expression

    Paula M. Niedenthal;Martial Mermillod;Marcus Maringer;Ursula Hess

  • Life Tasks, Self-Concept Ideals, and Cognitive Strategies in a Life Transition

    Nancy Cantor;Julie K. Norem;Paula M. Niedenthal;Christopher A. Langston

  • Psychology of Emotion

    Paula M. Niedenthal;François Ric

  • Embodiment of emotion concepts.

    Paula M. Niedenthal;Piotr Winkielman;Laurie Mondillon;Nicolas Vermeulen

  • When did her smile drop? Facial mimicry and the influences of emotional state on the detection of change in emotional expression

    Paula M. Niedenthal;Markus Brauer;Jamin B. Halberstadt;Åse H. Innes-Ker

  • Are shame and guilt related to distinct self-discrepancies? A test of Higgins's (1987) hypotheses.

    June Price Tangney;Paula M. Niedenthal;Michelle Vowell Covert;Deborah Hill Barlow

  • Adult Attachment and the Perception of Emotional Expressions: Probing the Hyperactivating Strategies Underlying Anxious Attachment

    R. Chris Fraley;Paula M. Niedenthal;Michael Marks;Claudia Brumbaugh

  • Social Functionality of Human Emotion

    Paula M. Niedenthal;Markus Brauer

  • Implicit perception of affective information

    Paula M Niedenthal

  • An influence of positive affect on social categorization

    Alice M. Isen;Paula M. Niedenthal;Nancy Cantor

  • Perception of the duration of emotional events

    Sylvie Droit-Volet;Sophie Brunot;Paula M. Niedenthal

  • Emotion Congruence in Perception

    Paula M. Niedenthal;Marc B. Setterlund

  • The heart's eye: Emotional influences in perception and attention.

    Paula M. Niedenthal;Shinobu Kitayama

  • Fashioning the Face: Sensorimotor Simulation Contributes to Facial Expression Recognition

    Adrienne Wood;Magdalena Rychlowska;Sebastian Korb;Paula M. Niedenthal

  • On motivation and the self-concept.

    Nancy Cantor;Hazel Markus;Paula Niedenthal;Paula Nurius

  • Emotional state and the detection of change in facial expression of emotion

    Paula M. Niedenthal;Jamin B. Halberstadt;Jonathan Margolin;Åse H. Innes-Ker

  • Convergence in the physical appearance of spouses

    R. B. Zajonc;Pamela K. Adelmann;Sheila T. Murphy;Paula M. Niedenthal

  • Beyond smiles: The impact of culture and race in embodying and decoding facial expressions

    Roberto Caldara

Frequent Co-Authors

Sylvie Droit-Volet
Sylvie Droit-Volet University of Clermont Auvergne
Piotr Winkielman
Piotr Winkielman University of California, San Diego
Jamin Halberstadt
Jamin Halberstadt University of Otago
Nancy Cantor
Nancy Cantor Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Eva Gilboa-Schechtman
Eva Gilboa-Schechtman Bar-Ilan University
Ursula Hess
Ursula Hess Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Yuri Miyamoto
Yuri Miyamoto Hitotsubashi University
Lawrence W. Barsalou
Lawrence W. Barsalou University of Glasgow
Agneta H. Fischer
Agneta H. Fischer University of Amsterdam
John F. Kihlstrom
John F. Kihlstrom University of California, Berkeley

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology degree in the USA opens up diverse professional pathways, especially as demand grows for specialized roles like Board Certified Behavior Analysts (BCBAs). Online psychology and applied behavior analysis programs have become popular options for those seeking flexibility while preparing for these dynamic careers.

A crucial step toward becoming a BCBA is meeting both education and supervision requirements, which can vary by location. For example, if you are interested in pursuing bcba certification requirements in Raleigh, it's important to understand state-specific prerequisites and supervised fieldwork expectations. Likewise, aspiring professionals should review local standards, as outlined in the Reno bcba education requirements and updated guidance for Richmond bcba requirements.

Many accredited universities now offer online programs tailored to different regions. Reviewing the Riverside bcba education requirements can help you decide on the right coursework and program for your goals. Ultimately, aligning your degree choice with local credentialing standards ensures a smoother path to licensure and a rewarding career in psychology or related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Paula M. Niedenthal

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles