World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Bruno Gonçalves

Bruno Gonçalves

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
36
Citations
13290
World Ranking
10968
National Ranking
4561

Bruno Gonçalves publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruno Gonçalves sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 65 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Bruno Gonçalves D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruno Gonçalves sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bruno Gonçalves is a researcher affiliated with TRM Labs in the United States, contributing to fields at the intersection of physics, social sciences, and engineering. Their work encompasses diverse topics such as opinion dynamics, social influence, complex network analysis, and computational text analysis methods.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Physics and Astronomy
  • Social Sciences
  • Engineering

Subfields in which Gonçalves has published research involve:

  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
  • Communication

Key topics in their research portfolio are:

  • Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
  • Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Social Media and Politics
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Spam and Phishing Detection
  • Computational and Text Analysis Methods
  • Social and Cultural Dynamics

The scientist has coauthored multiple publications with a consistent group of collaborators, including Michael Conover, A. Ratkiewicz, Filippo Menczer, Alessandro Flammini, and Hugo Barbosa.

Gonçalves has published in various venues, often contributing to:

  • Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
  • Revista do Professor de Física
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • PLoS ONE

Selected recent publications include:

  • "Political Polarization on Twitter," 2021, Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • "Detecting and Tracking Political Abuse in Social Media," 2021, Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • "American cultural regions mapped through the lexical analysis of social media," 2023, Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
  • "Pêndulo Simples: Tracker x Phyphox," 2020, Revista do Professor de Física
  • "Exact Foldy-Wouthuysen transformation for a Dirac equation describing the interaction of spin-1/2 relativistic particles with an external electromagnetic field," 2023, arXiv (Cornell University)

Bruno Gonçalves has contributed to book publications with Springer International Publishing, including:

  • Complex Networks XI, 2020
  • Complex Networks XII, 2021

Best Publications

  • Political Polarization on Twitter

    Michael D. Conover;Jacob Ratkiewicz;Matthew R. Francisco;Bruno Gonçalves

  • Multiscale mobility networks and the spatial spreading of infectious diseases

    Duygu Balcan;Vittoria Colizza;Bruno Gonçalves;Hao Hu

  • Detecting and Tracking Political Abuse in Social Media

    Jacob Ratkiewicz;Michael D. Conover;Mark Meiss;Bruno Goncalves

  • Predicting the Political Alignment of Twitter Users

    Michael D. Conover;Bruno Goncalves;Jacob Ratkiewicz;Alessandro Flammini

  • Modeling users' activity on Twitter networks: validation of Dunbar's number

    Bruno Goncalves;Nicola Perra;Alessandro Vespignani

  • Activity driven modeling of time varying networks

    Nicola Perra;Bruno Goncalves;Romualdo Pastor-Satorras;Alessandro Vespignani;Alessandro Vespignani

  • Modeling the spatial spread of infectious diseases: The GLobal Epidemic and Mobility computational model

    Duygu Balcan;Bruno Gonçalves;Hao Hu;José J. Ramasco

  • Truthy: mapping the spread of astroturf in microblog streams

    Jacob Ratkiewicz;Michael Conover;Mark Meiss;Bruno Gonçalves

  • Dynamical classes of collective attention in twitter

    Janette Lehmann;Bruno Gonçalves;José J. Ramasco;Ciro Cattuto

  • The Twitter of Babel: Mapping World Languages through Microblogging Platforms

    Delia Mocanu;Andrea Baronchelli;Nicola Perra;Bruno Gonçalves

  • Happiness is assortative in online social networks

    Johan Bollen;Bruno Gonçalves;Guangchen Ruan;Huina Mao

  • Comparing large-scale computational approaches to epidemic modeling: agent-based versus structured metapopulation models.

    Marco Ajelli;Bruno Gonçalves;Duygu Balcan;Vittoria Colizza

  • Partisan asymmetries in online political activity

    Michael D Conover;Bruno Gonçalves;Alessandro Flammini;Filippo Menczer

  • Real-time numerical forecast of global epidemic spreading: case study of 2009 A/H1N1pdm

    Michele Tizzoni;Paolo Bajardi;Chiara Poletto;José J. Ramasco

  • The GLEaMviz computational tool, a publicly available software to explore realistic epidemic spreading scenarios at the global scale.

    Wouter Van den Broeck;Corrado Gioannini;Bruno Gonçalves;Marco Quaggiotto;Marco Quaggiotto

  • Towards a characterization of behavior-disease models.

    Nicola Perra;Duygu Balcan;Bruno Gonçalves;Alessandro Vespignani

  • Links that speak: The global language network and its association with global fame

    Shahar Ronen;Bruno Gonçalves;Bruno Gonçalves;Kevin Z. Hu;Alessandro Vespignani

  • Human dynamics revealed through Web analytics.

    Bruno Gonçalves;José J. Ramasco

  • Random walks and search in time-varying networks

    Nicola Perra;Andrea Baronchelli;Delia Mocanu;Bruno Gonçalves

  • The role of information diffusion in the evolution of social networks

    Lilian Weng;Jacob Ratkiewicz;Nicola Perra;Bruno Gonçalves

Frequent Co-Authors

Alessandro Vespignani
Alessandro Vespignani Northeastern University
José J. Ramasco
José J. Ramasco Spanish National Research Council
Filippo Menczer
Filippo Menczer Indiana University
Alessandro Flammini
Alessandro Flammini Indiana University
Andrea Baronchelli
Andrea Baronchelli City, University of London
Johan Bollen
Johan Bollen Indiana University
Romualdo Pastor-Satorras
Romualdo Pastor-Satorras Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya
Pan Hui
Pan Hui Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Yamir Moreno
Yamir Moreno University of Zaragoza
Steven Pinker
Steven Pinker Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in science and engineering fields can open up exciting career opportunities while offering greater flexibility. Many students are now considering a 2-year computer science degree online, which provides a fast-track into tech fields and is ideal for those seeking to balance work or family commitments.

Interest is also growing in specialized programs like an online environmental engineering degree science and engineering pathway. These degrees prepare graduates for impactful roles addressing sustainability and environmental challenges.

Another important consideration is the mechanical engineering cost of education for those pursuing engineering careers online. Affordable, accredited programs can make this pathway more accessible, helping students manage expenses while gaining a valuable technical skillset.

For those curious about the sciences, it’s worth asking: can you get a physics degree online? The answer is yes—there are flexible, affordable options for students who want to study physics without needing to relocate, opening doors to diverse STEM careers.

Best Scientists Citing Bruno Gonçalves

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles