World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
56
Citations
13375
World Ranking
4055
National Ranking
177

Ingmar Weber publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ingmar Weber sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 236 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Ingmar Weber D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ingmar Weber sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2017 - ACM Senior Member

Overview

Ingmar Weber is affiliated with Saarland University in Germany. Their main field of study is Social Sciences, with a total of 85 publications. Within this domain, their subfields of focus include Sociology and Political Science, Transportation, Communication, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, and Information Systems.

The research topics covered by Ingmar Weber demonstrate a diverse interest in areas related to digital and social data analysis. Major topics include:

  • Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
  • Social Media and Politics
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Data-Driven Disease Surveillance
  • Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Migration and Labor Dynamics
  • Social Media in Health Education

The scientist has contributed to multiple research venues, notably:

  • Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (13 publications)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (13 publications)
  • Harvard Dataverse (6 publications)
  • PLoS ONE (2 publications)
  • Demography (2 publications)

Frequent collaborators include Masoomali Fatehkia (14 joint publications), Emilio Zagheni (10), Vedran Sekara (9), Manuel García-Herranz (9), and Isabelle Tingzon (7).

Representative recent papers by Ingmar Weber include:

  • "Social Media Participation in an Activist Movement for Racial Equality," 2021, Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • "Analyzing the Targets of Hate in Online Social Media," 2021, Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • "Monitoring of the Venezuelan exodus through Facebook's advertising platform," 2020, PLoS ONE
  • "Monitoring global digital gender inequality using the online populations of Facebook and Google," 2020, Demographic Research
  • "A Framework for Estimating Migrant Stocks Using Digital Traces and Survey Data: An Application in the United Kingdom," 2021, Demography

In addition to journal and conference articles, Ingmar Weber has contributed to book publications, including a title published by RAND Corporation eBooks: "Using Social Media to Extract Information About Chemical Weapons Incidents: A Methodology and Demonstration of Concept from the Civil War in Syria," published in 2022.

In 2017, Ingmar Weber was recognized as an ACM Senior Member, reflecting professional standing within the computing community.

Best Publications

  • Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Language

    Thomas Davidson;Dana Warmsley;Michael W. Macy;Ingmar Weber

  • Learning Cross-Modal Embeddings for Cooking Recipes and Food Images

    Amaia Salvador;Nicholas Hynes;Yusuf Aytar;Javier Marin

  • Understanding Abuse: A Typology of Abusive Language Detection Subtasks.

    Zeerak Waseem;Thomas Davidson;Dana Warmsley;Ingmar Weber

  • Racial Bias in Hate Speech and Abusive Language Detection Datasets

    Thomas Davidson;Debasmita Bhattacharya;Ingmar Weber

  • Analyzing the Targets of Hate in Online Social Media

    Leandro Araújo Silva;Mainack Mondal;Denzil Correa;Fabrício Benevenuto

  • Web search queries can predict stock market volumes.

    Ilaria Bordino;Stefano Battiston;Guido Caldarelli;Guido Caldarelli;Matthieu Cristelli

  • You Tweet What You Eat: Studying Food Consumption Through Twitter

    Sofiane Abbar;Yelena Mejova;Ingmar Weber

  • Type less, find more: fast autocompletion search with a succinct index

    Holger Bast;Ingmar Weber

  • Recipe1M+: A Dataset for Learning Cross-Modal Embeddings for Cooking Recipes and Food Images

    Javier Marin;Aritro Biswas;Ferda Ofli;Nicholas Hynes

  • Inferring international and internal migration patterns from Twitter data

    Emilio Zagheni;Venkata Rama Kiran Garimella;Ingmar Weber;Bogdan State

  • A large-scale sentiment analysis for Yahoo! answers

    Onur Kucuktunc;B. Barla Cambazoglu;Ingmar Weber;Hakan Ferhatosmanoglu

  • Personalized, interactive tag recommendation for flickr

    Nikhil Garg;Ingmar Weber

  • The demographics of web search

    Ingmar Weber;Carlos Castillo

  • Social Media Participation in an Activist Movement for Racial Equality

    Munmun De Choudhury;Shagun Jhaver;Benjamin Sugar;Ingmar Weber

  • Type Less, Find More: Fast Autocompletion Search with a Succinct Index

    Holger Bast;Ingmar Weber;Efthimis N. Efthimiadis;Susan Dumais

  • A long-term analysis of polarization on Twitter

    Venkata Rama Kiran Garimella;Ingmar Weber

  • ESTER: efficient search on text, entities, and relations

    Holger Bast;Alexandru Chitea;Fabian Suchanek;Ingmar Weber

  • Purely URL-based topic classification

    Eda Baykan;Monika Henzinger;Ludmila Marian;Ingmar Weber

  • Using Facebook ad data to track the global digital gender gap

    Masoomali Fatehkia;Ridhi Kashyap;Ingmar Weber

  • The CompleteSearch Engine: Interactive, Efficient, and Towards IR & DB integration

    Holger Bast;Ingmar Weber

  • Content and Network Dynamics Behind Egyptian Political Polarization on Twitter

    Javier Borge-Holthoefer;Walid Magdy;Kareem Darwish;Ingmar Weber

Frequent Co-Authors

Monika Henzinger
Monika Henzinger Institute of Science and Technology Austria
Michael W. Macy
Michael W. Macy Cornell University
Ferda Ofli
Ferda Ofli Hamad bin Khalifa University
Walid Magdy
Walid Magdy University of Edinburgh
Kareem Darwish
Kareem Darwish Hamad bin Khalifa University
Munmun De Choudhury
Munmun De Choudhury Georgia Institute of Technology
Aristides Gionis
Aristides Gionis Royal Institute of Technology
Hamed Haddadi
Hamed Haddadi Imperial College London
Guido Caldarelli
Guido Caldarelli Ca Foscari University of Venice
Fabrício Benevenuto
Fabrício Benevenuto Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens up a world of possibilities. Many students also consider online programs for added flexibility and affordability. Pursuing an emba online can offer business leadership skills, making it a popular choice for those who want to combine technology with management.

If you have a passion for information organization and technology, online mlis programs (Master of Library and Information Science) provide excellent training in digital curation, data management, and information systems.

Cost is often a major concern. Many learners seek affordable master's degrees online to advance their skills in computer science or related fields without excessive student debt.

For those pursuing academic, consulting, or senior leadership roles, a phd in organizational leadership can be a valuable next step. These pathways show the growing synergy between technology and other sectors, paving the way for diverse and rewarding careers.

Best Scientists Citing Ingmar Weber

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles