World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Qatar
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
76
Citations
29145
World Ranking
1322
National Ranking
2

Bernard J. Jansen publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bernard J. Jansen sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 426 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Bernard J. Jansen D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bernard J. Jansen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Computer Science in Qatar Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Qatar Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Qatar Leader Award
  • 2017 - ACM Senior Member

Overview

Bernard J. Jansen is affiliated with the Qatar Computing Research Institute in Qatar. Their research spans multiple disciplines including computer science, social sciences, and business, management, and accounting. The focus areas of their work involve human-computer interaction, marketing, artificial intelligence, sociology and political science, as well as demography.

They have extensively contributed to topics such as persona design and applications, innovative human-technology interaction, service and product innovation, technology use by older adults, digital marketing and social media, hate speech and cyberbullying detection, and social media and politics.

Bernard J. Jansen has coauthored many publications with frequent collaborators including Joni Salminen, Soon-gyo Jung, Hind Almerekhi, Soon-Gyo Jung, and Kathleen Guan.

Some notable recent papers include:

  • Employing large language models in survey research (2023) published in Natural Language Processing Journal
  • Creating and detecting fake reviews of online products (2021) published in Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services
  • A Survey of 15 Years of Data-Driven Persona Development (2021) published in International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
  • Developing an online hate classifier for multiple social media platforms (2020) published in Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences
  • Data-Driven Personas for Enhanced User Understanding: Combining Empathy with Rationality for Better Insights to Analytics (2020) published in Data and Information Management

Bernard J. Jansen's work has appeared frequently in specific publication venues, including:

  • Data and Information Management
  • International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
  • Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
  • International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
  • Behaviour and Information Technology

They have also authored books, including titles published by Morgan & Claypool Publishers and Synthesis lectures on human-centered informatics. These include "Understanding Audiences, Customers, and Users via Analytics" (2023) and "Data-Driven Personas" (2021).

Their scholarly contributions have been recognized with an ACM Senior Member award in 2017.

Best Publications

  • Twitter power: Tweets as electronic word of mouth

    Bernard J. Jansen;Mimi Zhang;Kate Sobel;Abdur Chowdury

  • Real life, real users, and real needs: a study and analysis of user queries on the web

    Bernard J. Jansen;Amanda Spink;Tefko Saracevic

  • How are we searching the world wide web?: a comparison of nine search engine transaction logs

    Bernard J. Jansen;Amanda Spink

  • Detecting rumors from microblogs with recurrent neural networks

    Jing Ma;Wei Gao;Prasenjit Mitra;Sejeong Kwon

  • Real life information retrieval: a study of user queries on the Web

    Bernard J. Jansen;Amanda Spink;Judy Bateman;Tefko Saracevic

  • From e-sex to e-commerce: Web search changes

    A. Spink;B.J. Jansen;D. Wolfram;T. Saracevic

  • A review of web searching studies and a framework for future research

    Bernard J. Jansen;Udo Pooch

  • Determining the informational, navigational, and transactional intent of Web queries

    Bernard J. Jansen;Danielle L. Booth;Amanda Spink

  • Search log analysis: What it is, what's been done, how to do it

    Bernard J. Jansen

  • A model for understanding collaborative information behavior in context: A study of two healthcare teams

    Madhu C. Reddy;Bernard J. Jansen

  • An examination of searcher's perceptions of nonsponsored and sponsored links during ecommerce Web searching

    Bernard J. Jansen;Marc Resnick

  • Sponsored search: an overview of the concept, history, and technology

    Bernard J. Jansen;Tracy Mullen

  • Determining the user intent of web search engine queries

    Bernard J. Jansen;Danielle L. Booth;Amanda Spink

  • An analysis of web documents retrieved and viewed

    Bernard J. Jansen;Amanda Spink

  • Micro-blogging as online word of mouth branding

    Bernard J. Jansen;Mimi Zhang;Kate Sobel;Abdur Chowdury

  • Defining a session on Web search engines

    Bernard J. Jansen;Amanda Spink;Chris Blakely;Sherry Koshman

  • Determining the informational, navigational and transactional intent of web queries

    Danielle Booth;Bernard Jansen;Amanda Spink

  • Developing an online hate classifier for multiple social media platforms

    Joni Salminen;Joni Salminen;Maximilian Hopf;Shammur A. Chowdhury;Soon gyo Jung

  • An analysis of web searching by European AlltheWeb.com users

    Bernard J. Jansen;Amanda Spink

  • A temporal comparison of AltaVista Web searching

    Bernard J. Jansen;Amanda Spink;Jan O. Pedersen

  • Web searcher interaction with the Dogpile.com metasearch engine

    Bernard J. Jansen;Amanda Spink;Sherry Koshman

Frequent Co-Authors

Amanda Spink
Amanda Spink Queensland University of Technology
Haewoon Kwak
Haewoon Kwak Indiana University
Tefko Saracevic
Tefko Saracevic Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Partha P. Mukherjee
Partha P. Mukherjee Purdue University West Lafayette
Daniel Zeng
Daniel Zeng Chinese Academy of Sciences
Jamie Murphy
Jamie Murphy University of Eastern Finland
Prasenjit Mitra
Prasenjit Mitra Pennsylvania State University
C. Lee Giles
C. Lee Giles Pennsylvania State University
John Yen
John Yen Pennsylvania State University
Yaser Jararweh
Yaser Jararweh Jordan University of Science and Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education can open flexible pathways to launch or advance your career in computer science. Students who are just starting out might consider an online associate's degree as a practical first step, providing foundational knowledge and skills to enter the workforce or transfer to a four-year college.

If you’re looking for programs with a strong job outlook, it’s wise to seek graduate degrees that are worth it, particularly in fields like data science, information security, and artificial intelligence. These advanced degrees can help you specialize and increase your earning potential.

Affordability and accessibility are key concerns for many students. Fortunately, there are affordable online colleges that offer quality education without the high price tag, making it easier to manage your investment in education and minimize student debt.

For those with a lower undergraduate GPA, there are still options. Some online graduate schools with low gpa requirements accept nontraditional students, helping you continue your studies and pursue your desired career in tech regardless of previous academic challenges.

Best Scientists Citing Bernard J. Jansen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles