World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 41 7794 7490 116 116 152 5855

Mike Starr publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mike Starr between 1978 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mike Starr published across 44 years, from 1978 to 2021, averaging 3.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2005. 5 of the 157 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2005. 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 3 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 2 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 2 publications
1978 2021

157 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mike Starr: publications per year, 1978 to 2021
Year Publications
1978 1
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 2
1986 1
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 1
1991 0
1992 1
1993 1
1994 3
1995 2
1996 3
1997 5
1998 6
1999 3
2000 9
2001 6
2002 4
2003 5
2004 7
2005 11
2006 4
2007 8
2008 5
2009 8
2010 1
2011 2
2012 8
2013 9
2014 9
2015 10
2016 4
2017 4
2018 6
2019 3
2020 3
2021 2
Total 157
Download as CSV

Mike Starr publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mike Starr sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 152 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539 152
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Mike Starr D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mike Starr sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343 41
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Ecology
  • Ecosystem
  • Agriculture

Mike Starr mainly investigates Soil water, Environmental chemistry, Soil horizon, Ecology and Taiga. His work on Acid deposition as part of general Soil water research is often related to Current, thus linking different fields of science. The concepts of his Environmental chemistry study are interwoven with issues in Throughfall, Leaching, Bulk density and Hydrology.

His work carried out in the field of Hydrology brings together such families of science as Total organic carbon and Hydrometeorology. His research investigates the connection between Soil horizon and topics such as Podzol that intersect with problems in Soil solution, Solution chemistry and Agroforestry. His Taiga research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Scots pine, Boreal and Botany.

His most cited work include:

  • Decomposition and nutrient release from logging residues after clear-cutting of mixed boreal forest (193 citations)
  • Advances in understanding the podzolization process resulting from a multidisciplinary study of three coniferous forest soils in the Nordic Countries (140 citations)
  • Carbon and nitrogen pools in an old-growth, Norway spruce mixed forest in eastern Finland and changes associated with clear-cutting (123 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Mike Starr spends much of his time researching Hydrology, Soil water, Environmental chemistry, Agronomy and Taiga. The Hydrology study combines topics in areas such as Climate change and Deposition. His Soil water study necessitates a more in-depth grasp of Soil science.

His research in Environmental chemistry intersects with topics in Throughfall and Organic matter. His work deals with themes such as Agroforestry, Nutrient and Soil fertility, which intersect with Agronomy. His Taiga study also includes

  • Ecology and Old-growth forest most often made with reference to Scots pine,
  • Picea abies which is related to area like Basal area.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Hydrology (26.39%)
  • Soil water (22.92%)
  • Environmental chemistry (21.53%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2012-2021)?

  • Agronomy (15.97%)
  • Hydrology (26.39%)
  • Agroforestry (12.50%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His main research concerns Agronomy, Hydrology, Agroforestry, Soil carbon and Soil water. Mike Starr combines subjects such as Forest floor, Soil fertility and Water content with his study of Agronomy. His Hydrology research incorporates themes from Ecotoxicology, Climate change and Dissolved organic carbon.

The various areas that Mike Starr examines in his Agroforestry study include Carbon sequestration, Productivity and Biomass. Mike Starr specializes in Soil water, namely Throughfall. His research integrates issues of Environmental chemistry, Aquatic ecosystem, Deposition, Freshwater ecosystem and Terrestrial ecosystem in his study of Throughfall.

Between 2012 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Carbon, and Suspended Solids Loads from Forest Clear-Cutting and Site Preparation: Long-Term Paired Catchment Studies from Eastern Finland (51 citations)
  • Iron concentrations are increasing in surface waters from forested headwater catchments in Eastern Finland (46 citations)
  • Allometric equations for estimating aboveground biomass of Coffea arabica L. grown in the Rift Valley escarpment of Ethiopia (26 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Ecology
  • Ecosystem
  • Agriculture

Mike Starr focuses on Agroforestry, Hydrology, Carbon sequestration, Agronomy and Soil carbon. His Agroforestry research includes elements of Biomass, Fruit tree and Coffea arabica. His Hydrology research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Total organic carbon and Dissolved organic carbon.

Mike Starr has included themes like Biomass, Soil classification, Woody plant, Forestry and Available water capacity in his Carbon sequestration study. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Soil science, Felling, Clearcutting, Forest floor and Taiga. His Soil carbon study combines topics in areas such as Acacia, Logging, Woodland and Land degradation.

Best Publications

  • Decomposition and nutrient release from logging residues after clear-cutting of mixed boreal forest

    M. Palviainen;L. Finér;A.-M. Kurka;H. Mannerkoski

  • Carbon and nitrogen pools in an old-growth, Norway spruce mixed forest in eastern Finland and changes associated with clear-cutting

    Leena Finér;Hannu Mannerkoski;Sirpa Piirainen;Michael Starr

  • Tree biomass and soil organic carbon densities across the Sudanese woodland savannah: A regional carbon sequestration study

    Syed Ashraful Alam;Mike Starr;Barnaby Clark

  • Advances in understanding the podzolization process resulting from a multidisciplinary study of three coniferous forest soils in the Nordic Countries

    U.S. Lundström;N. van Breemen;D.C. Bain;P.A.W. van Hees

  • Effects of forest clear-cutting on the carbon and nitrogen fluxes through podzolic soil horizons

    Sirpa Piirainen;Leena Finér;Hannu Mannerkoski;Michael Starr

  • Models of litterfall production for Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) in Finland using stand, site and climate factors

    Michael Starr;Anna Saarsalmi;Tatu Hokkanen;Päivi Merilä

  • Model analysis of the effects of soil age, fires and harvesting on the carbon storage of boreal forest soils

    J. Liski;H. Ilvesniemi;A. Mäkelä;M. Starr

  • Trends in hydrometeorological conditions and stream water organic carbon in boreal forested catchments.

    Sakari Sarkkola;Harri Koivusalo;Ari Lauren;Pirkko Kortelainen

  • Critical loads of acidic deposition for forest soils: Is the current approach adequate?

    H. Lokke;J. Bak;U. Falkengren-Grerup;R.D. Finlay

  • Carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus leaching after site preparation at a boreal forest clear-cut area

    Sirpa Piirainen;Leena Finér;Hannu Mannerkoski;Michael Starr

  • Release of potassium, calcium, iron and aluminium from Norway spruce, Scots pine and silver birch logging residues

    Marjo Palviainen;Leena Finér;Anne-Marie Kurka;Hannu Mannerkoski

  • Bulk density of forested mineral soils.

    Pekka Tamminen;Michael Starr

  • Distribution and mobilization of Al, Fe and Si in three podzolic soil profiles in relation to the humus layer.

    R. Giesler;H. Ilvesniemi;L. Nyberg;P. A. W. van Hees

  • Iron concentrations are increasing in surface waters from forested headwater catchments in Eastern Finland

    Sakari Sarkkola;Mika Nieminen;Harri Koivusalo;Ari Laurén

  • Responses of ground vegetation species to clear-cutting in a boreal forest: aboveground biomass and nutrient contents during the first 7 years

    Marjo Palviainen;Leena Finér;Hannu Mannerkoski;Sirpa Piirainen

  • Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Carbon, and Suspended Solids Loads from Forest Clear-Cutting and Site Preparation: Long-Term Paired Catchment Studies from Eastern Finland

    Marjo Palviainen;Leena Finér;Ari Laurén;Samuli Launiainen

  • Biomass and soil carbon stocks of indigenous agroforestry systems on the south-eastern Rift Valley escarpment, Ethiopia

    Mesele Negash;Mesele Negash;Michael Robert Starr

  • Effects of forest clear-cutting on the sulphur, phosphorus and base cations fluxes through podzolic soil horizons

    Sirpa Piirainen;Leena Finér;Hannu Mannerkoski;Michael Starr

  • Heavy metal budgets for two headwater forested catchments in background areas of Finland.

    L Ukonmaanaho;M Starr;J Mannio;T Ruoho-Airola

  • A Survey of Forest Soil Properties Related to Soil Acidification in Southern Finland

    Pekka Tamminen;Michael R. Starr

  • Carbon reservoirs in peatlands and forests in the boreal regions of Finland.

    Pekka E. Kauppi;Maximillian Posch;Pekka Hänninen;Helena M. Henttonen

Frequent Co-Authors

Leena Finér
Leena Finér Natural Resources Institute Finland
Martin Forsius
Martin Forsius Finnish Environment Institute
Hannu Ilvesniemi
Hannu Ilvesniemi Finnish Forest Research Institute
Jukka Laine
Jukka Laine Natural Resources Institute Finland
Harri Koivusalo
Harri Koivusalo Aalto University
Pirkko Kortelainen
Pirkko Kortelainen Finnish Environment Institute
Pasi Kolari
Pasi Kolari University of Helsinki
Eero Nikinmaa
Eero Nikinmaa University of Helsinki
Timo Vesala
Timo Vesala University of Helsinki
Frank Berninger
Frank Berninger University of Eastern Finland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open up diverse career opportunities. One popular pathway includes geology, which delves into earth processes and natural resources. Many universities now offer geology degrees online, making it easier to study this vital field remotely while gaining practical knowledge applicable to environmental careers.

Additionally, students aiming for a broader educational foundation might consider an affordable online general studies degree. This flexible degree allows learners to customize their coursework, often combining environmental topics with social sciences or policy, which is beneficial for multidisciplinary roles in sustainability and conservation.

While environmental fields sometimes demand specialized training, some opt for degrees considered among the easiest bachelor's degree to get as a strategic step to entering the workforce quickly. These programs may provide foundational skills necessary for entry-level positions or support career transitions.

For those focused on advanced practice and leadership in social and environmental welfare, pursuing one of the cheapest online DSW programs can be a cost-effective way to specialize and enhance career prospects, especially in community and environmental advocacy roles.

Best Scientists Citing Mike Starr

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles